Delhi Court November 1994 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Siri Ram Sharma Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-1994
Reported in: 56(1994)DLT684
P.K. Bahri, J. (1) S/SHI Sin Ram Sharma. Dharam Raj, Lekh Raj, Rajpal Singh. Suresh and Man Singh Rawat have been convicted. of offences punishable under Sections 436 and 302 read with Section 149 I. P. C. and for offence punishable under Section 147 read with Section 148 of the Indian Penal Code vide judgment dated October 25, 1988 and by an order of the even date. they have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and pay a fine of Rs. 2,000.00 each and in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months more under Section 302 read with Section 149 and to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years and a fine of Rs. 2,0001- and in default rigorous imprisonment for three months each for the offence punishable under Section 436 read with Section 149 I. P. C. and to undergo rigorous imprisonment of two years for offence punishable under Section 147 read with Section 148 I. P. C. each with the direction that substantive sentences shall run concurrently and fine,...
R.L. Bhardwaj Vs. Shivalik Co-operative Group Housing Society Limited ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-1994
Reported in: 56(1994)DLT600
Usha Mehra, J.(1) Sh. R.L. Bhardwaj, plaintiff herein, is one of the member shareholder of defendant Co-operative Group Housing Society consisting of 50members as its shareholders. With the funds contributed by the members and the financial assistance availed from institutions, work of construction of flat was taken up and completed by the Society in the year 1986-87. The constructed Apartment/building was given the name of 'Shivalik Apartments'. The price of each allotted flat on the ground floor, first floor, second floor and third floor was fixed. The cost for additional fixture with an individual flat was also fixed. In a meeting of members held on 10/08/1986 each member was allotted a flat. Plaintiff was allotted flat No. 47. It is the case of the plaintiff that terrace attached to the flat i.e.roof above flat No. 44 was allotted to the plaintiff. The roof above flat No. 44 is situated on second floor in Block-B of the complex. It is further the case of the plaintiff that price of...
Gurdev Singh Vs. Sunder Kaur and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-1994
Reported in: 56(1994)DLT605; 1994(31)DRJ534
Usha Mehra, J.(1) Sardar Gurdev Singh, plaintiff filed a suit claiming partition of property bearing No. 18/53, Ramjas Road, New Delhi and also permanent injunction restraining the defendants from disposing of or parting with possession of the said property. (2) Briefly the facts of the case as alleged in the plaint are that the father of the plaintiff was dealing in the wholesale kirana business in Pakistan. He separated his two sons,namely, S.Narinder Singh and S.Sohan Singh from the Huf in Pakistan itself and third son Gurcharan Singh was separated by a Release Deed dated 22nd November 1951 from the HUF.Thereafter, the Huf consisted of only father S.Prem Singh, mother Smt.Sundr Kaur and the plaintiff S.Gurdev Singh. Plaintiff started dealing in wholesale sugar business at Kota (Rajasthan) as partnership firm consisted of plaintiff and his father. But the family affairs were managed by mother Smt.Sunder Kaur as Trustee for the entire assets and property because she was a senior membe...
Indian Oil Corporation Vs. Indira Sood
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-1994
Reported in: 1994IVAD(Delhi)1065; 1995(1)ARBLR102(Delhi); 56(1994)DLT590; 1994(31)DRJ680
Usha Mehra, J.(1) Lpg distribution ship was awarded to Mrs. Indira Sood, sole proprietor of M/s Vikas Gas Agency (In short the 'Agency') under the Dgr Scheme for the rehabilitation of war effected widows of the defense personnel and their dependents. The Distribution ship Agreement was signed on 24th September,1975. The said agreement contained an arbitration clause No.37 which provided that in case of any dispute the matter shall be referred to the arbitration of the person to be appointed by the Managing Director of the Indian Oil Corporation (In short the 'Corporation'). Dispute arose between the Corporation and the Agency. The Corporation preferred a claim against the Agency on account of its failure to clear the outstanding amounts. Corporation terminated the dealership vide letter dated 8th April,1992 because the Agency issued unauthorised connections. Hence the Agency preferred claim against this termination of dealership. Two references were made to the arbitrator - one of the ...
Udai Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-1994
Reported in: 1994IVAD(Delhi)925; 56(1994)DLT703; 1994(31)DRJ664
K. Shivashankar Bhat, J. (1) The petitioner seeks the quashing of the appointment of the 4th respondent as Principal, Delhi Public School (DPS) R.K.Puram. The petitioner also seeks the quashing of an advertisement whereby applications were invited for the post of the Principal of the school at Vasant Kunj. There is another prayer to quash the mandate of the Working Committee dated 28.5.1993 which did not agree with the order of the Chairman of the committee to appoint a person as principal on officiating basis. There were other decisions also in the impugned proceedings of the working committee. Petitioner also seeks a mandamus to constitute a proper selection committee. (2) According to the petitioner he was appointed as a teacher in the Dps, R.K.Puram on 15.10.1982 and at the time of filing the writ petition he was working as officiating principal of Dps, Vasant Kunj. He questions the appointment of the 4th respondent as Principal of the School at R.K.Puram on the ground that the sel...
Harbhajan Kaur and ors. Vs. Rattan Chand Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-1994
Reported in: 1995(32)DRJ316
R.C. Lahoti, J.(1) This is an application filed by the defendant-judgment debtor which is to be considered by reference to Section 28(2)(a) of the Specific Relief Act,as noted by this Court in its order dated 3.8.93, 5.10.93 and 22.2.94. The suit property consist of a residential house K-96, Kirti Nagar, New Delhi. The defendant had entered into an agreement to sell the suit property to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs had filed a suit for specific performance of the agreement to sell which was dated 30.12.1978. Vide the judgment and decree dated 5.4.91, the suit was decreed. The plaintiffs were directed to deposit Rs. 1,68,000.00 within six weeks (from the date of the judgment) in the court. (2) It appears that the plaintiffs failed to fulfilll their part of the obligation under the decree. They failed to make the deposit of the amount within time appointed by the court. (3) The plaintiffs sought for an extension of time which prayer was rejected by this Court vide order dated 22.7.93. ...
Khusal Confectionary and Pharma Vs. C. C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-1994
Reported in: (1995)LC470Tri(Delhi)
1. Misc. Application - By the present application the applicants have made a prayer for restoration of the Stay Application No.E/Stay/697/94-D. Mrs. Archana Wadhwa, ld. advocate appeared on behalf of the applicants and pleaded that the stay application was dismissed for non-prosecution and she had filed an application for adjournment for the stay matter as the applicants intended to file more papers. She pleaded that she was under the bonafide belief that she had applied for adjournment and as such she did not appear on the date of hearing. She pleaded that in case the stay application is not restored the applicants shall suffer an irreparable loss and even there is no bar for filing the fresh stay application. Shri Mohan Lal, ld. JDR who appeared on behalf of the respondent has no objection for restoration of the stay application.2. We have heard both sides and have gone through the facts and circumstances of the case. The applicants had applied for adjournment vide application dated...
C.M.C. (India) Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-1994
Reported in: (1995)LC42Tri(Delhi)
1. These are appeals which have been filed with reference to the order of Collector (Appeals) dated 18-11- 1993.2. Ld. Counsel stated that the issue relates to the classification and rate of duty of their product ultramarine blue some of which are cleared by them in large packings and other in small packings.3. The department has accepted that ultramarine blue is classifiable under Heading 32.06.90 in respect of large packings but has classified the same product in small packings under 3212.90 in view of words dyes and other colouring matter put in forms (for example balls, tablets and the like) or small packings (for example sachets or bottles of liquid) of a kind used for domestic or laboratory purposes'.4. It was their contention that once their product was held as classifiable under Heading 32.06 it should remain classified under that heading irrespective of the size of packing because there is no such distinction made under that heading.5. It was also their contention that it was...
C.L. JaIn Woollen Mills Vs. Collector of Central Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-1994
Reported in: (1995)LC479Tri(Delhi)
1. This is an appeal filed by the assessee against an impugned order dated 29-3-1993 passed by the Collector of Central Excise & Customs, Chandigarh.2. The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of Blended Yarn falling under Chapter 55 of the Schedule annexed to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. For the purpose of deciding the issue of classification, the Central Excise Officers who visited premises of the appellants drew out the sample of the impugned goods manufactured by the appellants and forwarded the same to the Central Revenue Control Laboratory since Laboratory was required to test the sample for composition and the percentage of the various constituents in the impugned goods. The test was carried out by the Deputy Chief Chemist who reported the result of the analysis carried out by him in his letter dated 29-5-1989. The relevant extract is reproduced below :- "The sample is in the form of white single yarn with non-uniform thickness. It is composed of 76.2% (seventy...
Ravi Raj Gupta Vs. Acme Glass Mosaic Industries
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-1994
Reported in: 1994IVAD(Delhi)1045; 56(1994)DLT673; 1995(32)DRJ429
R.C.Lahoti, J. (1) This order disposes of the plaintiff's prayer for the grant of ad-interim injunction. (2) The plaintiff has filed a suit complaining of in fringment by the defendant of the plaintiff's patents No. 154388 dated 4.6.80 and No. 157991 dated 8.6.82. (3) The plaintiff is engaged in the manufacture and sale of glass tiles through a partnership firm M/s.Mridul Enterprises wherein he .is a partner besides his father and brother. According to the plaintiff he is actively engaged in research and development work relating particularly to glass tiles. The glass tiles made in India had a few disadvantages such as the edges of such tiles were sharp which could cause injury; surface of the tiles was not smooth and was devoid of aesthetic value and it had a tendency to get displaced when applied to , wall surface. Such tiles were produced from molten glass. The plaintiff's research involving considerable expenditure and effort resulted into a solution forming subject matter of paten...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »