Delhi Court August 1993 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vinod Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Suraj Kumari and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-05-1993
Reported in: 51(1993)DLT360; 1993RLR495
P.K. Bahri, J.(1) This petition is directed against order of the Rent Control Tribunal dated 9/04/1991, by which he had dismissed the appeal filed against the order of the Additional Rent Controller dated 7/02/1991, by which he had passed an interim order under Section 15(1) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, requiring the petitioner to deposit arrears of rent for the period 1/04/1987, at the rate of Rs. 500.00 per month, up to date within one month and continue to deposit month to month rent at the same rate till the disposal of the petition brought on the ground of non-payment of rent.(2) Undisputed facts of the case are that Respondent No. 1Smt. Suraj Kumari had let out the premises in question to Shri Chander Bhan Aggarwal who died in the year 1973 and after his death his son Shri Vinod Aggarwal was accepted as tenant and thereafter in 1974 the petitioner, a private limited company, was accepted as tenant, it appears that agreement for sale dated 5/10/1974, was entered into between Smt...
Liaq Mohammad Vs. Delhi Development Authority and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-05-1993
Reported in: 1993RLR557
P.K. Bahri, J.(1) This Regular Second Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree of Additional District Judge dated May 5, 1989 by which he had dismissed the appeal of the appellant and has affirmed the judgment and decree dated February 2, 1983 of Sub Judge by which suit of the plaintiff seeking possession of the property in question was dismissed. (2) Undisputed facts of the case are that the land underneath the super structure bearing municipal No 7766-7771/XIV, Kasab Pura, Sadar Bazar, Delhi measuring approximately 50 sq. yds. was ancestral property of Ch. Harphool Singh, predecessor in interest of the appellant and Hari Singh. A partition decree dated 10.5.56 in Suit No. 255 of 1955 was passed and this particular property fell to the share of Hari Singh. Hari Singh had vide Sale Deed dated4.12.73 transferred this property in favor of the appellant. (3) Prior to the partition of this property, the owners had let out the open plot in question to one Sh. Habib Ahmed vide Rent...
Mohinder Singh and ors. Vs. O.P. Khatri and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-05-1993
Reported in: 1993(27)DRJ424; (1994)ILLJ888Del
P.K. Bahri, J. (1) The petitioners, who are members of Respondent No.2-The Narela Co-operative Marketing Society Limited (hereinafter called the Society) which is registered with Respondent No.3-Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Delhi Administration, under the Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, 1972, have filed this writ petition seeking writ of certiorari or any other suitable writ or order or direction for quashing the notice dated January 13, 1992, issued by Respondent No. 1, the Secretary of the Society. This notice has called for holding of annual general meeting of the members of the Society of January 29,1992, at 11 Am in the premises of the Society at Mandi Narela. The agenda of the proposed meeting includes, inter alia, election programme for electing five members of the Managing Committee including one Vice President in accordance with the bye-laws Nos.28 & 29 in place of the five members so retiring. The election programme announced the date of filing of the nomination pap...
Mohammed Salim Khatri Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-05-1993
Reported in: 1993IIIAD(Delhi)541; 1994CriLJ1432; 1993(3)Crimes867; 52(1993)DLT114; 1993(27)DRJ372
S.C. Jain, J.(1) The facts leading to the passing of the detention order so far as they are relevant are as under.(2) Acting on intelligence that various Honda cars are being attempted to be imported surreptitiously and fraudulently thereby defrauding the Government by not producing a proper import license and not paying customs duty at the appropriate rate, at Air Cargo Complex, I.G.I. Airport, New Delhi, the officers of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Delhi Zonal Unit, New Delhi located nine Honda cars which were lying there pending customs clearance covered under Bills of Entry No. 229848 dated 11.6.92 in the name of Shri Mohammed Ahmed, R/oB-9, Housing Society, South Extension Part I, New Delhi; 225431 dated 18.5.92 in the name of Shri J.M.A. Wahab.R/o 206, Rawali Apartments. Aloknagar, New Delhi-19; 225374 dated 18.5.92 in the name of Shri K.S. Shanmugham, R/0 33E, Munirka, New Delhi; 234386 dated 6.7.92 in the name of Shri Ravi Puthenveetil Sreedharan, R/0 C-24, N.D.S.E. Par...
Nanak Chand Vs. Sobha Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-04-1993
Reported in: 51(1993)DLT366
P.K. Babri, J.(1) This regular second appeal has been brought against judgment and decree dated 5/10/1976, of an Additional District Judge by which he had dismissed the appeal brought by the appellant against the judgment and decree dated 15/03/1974, of Sub-Judge, 1st Class,Delhi, by which the suit of the respondent brought against the appellant in respect of recovery of possession of two plots measuring 136 'x 176 'and155 ' x 43 'as per plans Ex. P-3 and P-4 was decreed. There was another plot measuring 150' x 155' depicted in plan Ex. P-6 which was also let out to the appellant separately and a separate suit was brought for getting eviction of the appellant from that plot and that suit was also decreed by the samejudgment. No dispute remains in respect of the said plot. This appeal pertains only in respect of the decree passed in respect of the two plots.(2) The facts of the case, in brief, are that these two vacant plots had been let out to the appellant at the yearly rental of Rs. ...
Khairul Nissan Vs. Tufail Ahmed
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-1993
Reported in: 1993(27)DRJ277
D.K. Jain, J.(1) This appeal under section 39 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), is directed against the order dated 04 February 1978 of the Rent Control Tribunal, Delhi, reversing the order dated 24 September 1974 of the Addl. Rent Controller, Delhi and dismissing the appellant/landlady's (hereinafter referred to as the landlady) petition under section 14(l)(e) of the Act on the ground that the premises in question were not let out for residential purposes only but for residential-cum-commercial purposes. (2) MST. Khairul Nissan daughter of late Mr. Haji Mumtazuddin, the landlady, filed a petition under section 14(l)(e) of the Act against Mr. Tufail Ahmed, respondent/tenant (hereinafter referred to as the tenant) for his eviction from the premises, comprising of the entire first floor of the house No.5403, Kucha Rehman,Chandni Chowk, Delhi on the ground of non-payment of rent and bona fide requirement of the landlady, pleading that the premises i...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›