Delhi Court August 1993 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Lal Chand Vs. Begum Jan (Deceased) Mohd. Ahmed and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-17-1993
Reported in: 1993(27)DRJ394
P.K. Bahri, J.(1) This is second appeal arising from the judgment and decree dated December 24, 1976, of an Additional District Judge by which he had dismissed the appeal with costs against judgment and decree dated July 16, 1975 of a Sub Judge, by which a suit was decreed for recovery of possession in respect of house bearing No. 10462, Bagichi Pirji, Qasimpura, Subzi Mandi, Delhi. (Ward No. 12 as depicted in red colour in Ex. PW7/8) and decree of recovery of Rs.382/32P as mesne profits was also passed with costs. (2) According to the case set up by the respondent/plaintiff, she had obtained perpetual lease of the land measuring 14 Bighas 10 bids was in Khewat and Khata No.204/246 comprising of Khasra Nos.420,421,252/5 & 423. This lease-deed is dated March 3, 1943. Ex. P1 is the copy of the said registered lease-deed. Ex.P2 is the copy of the map showing the said land which was leased out to the respondent which was also registered Along with the lease-deed. There were certain unautho...
Kumar Khandsari Works Vs. Assessing Officer (Assessing Officer V. Kuma ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-17-1993
Reported in: (1994)49TTJ(Del)286
ORDERM.S. BAKSHI, J.M. :These cross appeals, one by the assessed and one by the Revenue, are disposed of by this consolidated order. We shall first take up the appeal of the assessed.2. assessed is a firm engaged in the business of Khandsari. It had filed two separate returns of income-one for the period from 4th Oct., 1984 to 25th July, 1985 and another from 25th July, 1985 to 23rd Oct., 1985. For the first period, there were three partners, namely, Raja Ram, Narinder Kumar and Satinder Kumar, having a share of 37.5, 37.5 and 25 respectively. On 25th July, 1985, a dissolution deed was executed and the firm styled as M/s Kumar Khandsari Works was dissolved w.e.f. 25th July, 1985. By virtue of the said dissolution deed Shri Raja Ram retired from the partnership, whereby all the assets and the liabilities of the firm were taken over by Shri Narinder Kumar and Satinder Kumar on 26th July, 1985, a partnership deed was executed between Shri Narinder Kumar, Satinder Kumar and Jatinder Kumar ...
Natasha Automobiles (P.) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-1993
Reported in: (1993)47ITD354(Delhi)
1. This appeal is directed against the order passed by the CIT (Appeals) rejecting the assessee's claim for carry forward of the business loss, incurred by it during the assessment year under appeal, viz., 1986-87.2. The appellant in this case is a Private Ltd. Company, which filed a return declaring a loss of Rs. 68,416 on 18th September, 1986 and which came to be computed at a figure of Rs. 61,208 vide order dated 27th September, 1988. The AO declined to carry forward the loss on the ground that the return had been filed late.3. On further appeal before the CIT (Appeals), it was contended that application in Form No. 6 seeking extension of time up to 30th Sept., 1986 had been filed. A subsequent argument, thereafter, was that since no intimation had been received from the AO, whether the extension sought for had been allowed or rejected, the company harboured under the impression that the said extension had, in fact, been allowed. For the aforesaid proposition, reliance was placed o...
Har Kishan Dass Vs. Bal Kishan Dass and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-1993
Reported in: 1993IIIAD(Delhi)502; 53(1994)DLT84
Sat Pal, J. (1) Since the point involved in both these applications is identical, these applications are being disposed of by this common order. (2) These applications have been filed on behalf of Shri Suraj Prakash defendant No.2, and in these applications it has been prayed that the order regarding the appointment of Shri K.B. Andley, Advocate as arbitrator be revoked. (3) Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that in the above suit Shri Bishan Lal Gupta was appointed as the arbitrator to decide the disputes between the parties vide order dated 18th October, 1989 passed by this Court. Thereafter, an application is 10728/90 was filed on behalf of the plaintiff wherein it was stated that there had been unreasonable delay in conducting the proceedings before the above mentioned Arbitrator and it was prayed that the authority of the said sole Arbitrator be revoked and a new Arbitrator in his place be appointed so that the matter in dispute between the parties pending since the year 1...
K.C. Chibber Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-1993
Reported in: 51(1993)DLT581
S.C. Jain, J.(1) By way of this application the petitioner prays for release on bail in anticipation of his arrest for the offences under Sections420, 468, 471. 423 read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code in F.I. R. No. 474/90, Police Station Hari Nagar, New Delhi.(2) According to the prosecution this petitioner entered into an Agreement to Sell the property in question in favor of K..L. Chhabra. A sum of Rs. 60,000 was paid to the petitioner on different dates i.e.Rs. 20,000 on 17.4.90, Rs. 30,000 on 20.4.90 and Rs. 10.000 on 19.6.90.(3) The execution of the sale deed could not take place. A settlement was arrived at between Mr. K.C. Chibber, the petitioner with Mr. K.L.Chhabra. On 2.11.90, the petitioner issued a cheque for Rs. 70,000 which was post dated for 5.12.90 drawn on the State Bank of India, Jaipur for refund of the earnest money of Rs. 60,000 plus the penalty of Rs. 10,000 toMr. K.L. Chhabra by way of settlement with the assurance that the cheque would be encased positively....
Nirmalan Selvarajah Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-1993
Reported in: 1993IIIAD(Delhi)747; 1993(3)Crimes642; 51(1993)DLT616; 1993(27)DRJ313
D.K. Jain, J.(1) This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia read with section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'the Code') is directed against the order dated 30 March 1993 passed by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi allowing the request of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) for suspension of trial and granting them time to file supplementary challan during the course of trial of the petitioner. A few facts necessary for appreciating the controversy involved in the case be narrated as follows:- The petitioner was arrested on 22 January 1991, when he visited a hotel in Karol Bagh, New Delhi and on his personal search certain forged documents, including passports and fake stamps are alleged to have been recovered. Further recoveries are also alleged to have been made when some houses at Vikaspuri, New Delhi and Madras were searched. A case under section 472/473/474 read with section 467 Indian Penal Code was registered and the Cbi fil...
E.P. Railway Refugees House Building Co-operative Society Vs. Commissi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-1993
Reported in: 53(1994)DLT94; 1993RLR552
P.K. Bahri, J.(1) This petition has been brought seeking writ of prohibition restraining respondents from using plot in question for any purpose other than setting up a primary school.(2) The petitioner is a house building cooperative society and retired government officials are members of this society and this society had been allotted a piece of land measuring 257.1 Bighas located in village Bahpur vide agreements dated 29.5.64 and dated 2.1.67, for a total consideration of Rs. 8,71,770.10 for allotting plots to the members of the society for the purpose of constructing residential houses. A layout plan was got approved from thes-M.C.D., Respondent No. 4 and the plot in question which is 2 acre of land was earmarked for setting up a primary school. It appears that this particular plot has been transferred to the Commissioner of Police for setting up a police station.(3) The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner, in brief, is that this layout plan has been prepared in a...
Baljit Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-1993
Reported in: 51(1993)DLT413
S.C. Jain, J.(1) The facts giving rise to this petition in brief are that on 15.8.91 the petitioner, Baljit Singh was intercepted on suspicion byA.I.U. Officers on his arrival from Delhi by flight No. AI-144 as a domestic passenger at Sahar Airport, Bombay. A search of his baggage, i.e. one handbag, in the presence of Panchas resulted in the recovery of foreign currency and Indian currency which were cleverly concealed in sweetmeat boxes. The said foreign currency and Indian currency equivalent to Indian Rs. 2.32.676.00were seized under Panchnama in the reasonable belief that the same were attempted to be smuggled out of India and hence liable for confiscation under the provisions of Customs Act, 1962. In his statement dated 15.8.91 he admitted possession .carriage and recovery of foreign currency and Indian currency from the two sweetmeat boxes carried by him in his hand bag and that the same were given to him by one Joginder Singh at Delhi for carrying to Singapore and to deliver to ...
Varinder Singh Batra Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-1993
Reported in: 1993(27)DRJ196
S.C. Jain, J.(1) The Petitioner has challenged the detention order passed on 4.12.92 under Section 3(l) of the Cofeposa (as amended) with a view to preventing him from smuggling goods in future by filing this writ petition. (2) The facts of the case in brief are that on 16.10.92 this petitioner was arrested from the aircraft and a search of his hand baggage resulted in the recovery of foreign exchange in the form of travellers' cheques and currency notes equivalent to Indian Rs. 18,01,236.35. On the same day he allegedly made a statement under section 108 of the Customs Act, which he allegedly retracted on 18.10.92. On his request he was medically examined by the Medical Officer, Central Jail, Tihar, New Delhi and as per the medical report dated 13.1 1.92 the following injuries were found on him:- [1]Bruises with swelling on both buttocks and on infra scapula region. [2]Bruises on left shoulder. [3]Swelling on right calf. Jail Doctor has stated in the aforesaid report that all the in...
Delhi Khadi and Village Industries Board Vs. Pragati Sansthan and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-12-1993
Reported in: 1993IIIAD(Delhi)505; 1993(27)DRJ264
Sat Pal, J. (1) This petition has been filed by Delhi Khadi & Village Industries Board,Delhi (hereinafter referred to as 'the claimant') under sections Hand 17ofthelndianArbitration Act (in short 'the Act') against M/s. Pragati Sansthan and others (here in after referred to as the 'principal debtor') and S/Shri Ved Prakash, Sardar Singh, Rameshwar and Gugan Singh (hereinafter referred to as 'the sureties'). In the petition it has been prayed that the arbitrator be directed to file the award and after issuing notices of the award to the parties, the award be made a rule of the Court. (2) After the award was filed in the Court, notices were issued to the parties. Objections under sections 30 and 33 of the Act against the award have been filed on behalf of respondent No. I vide is No. 13/89 and on behalf of respondents 2 to 5 vide is No.3173/89. The objections contained in the aforesaid two I As have been controverter by the claimant in their reply to these applications. Thereafter the fo...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »