Delhi Court March 1993 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Suruchi Sansthan and ors. Vs. Government of the National Capital Terri ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-1993
Reported in: 1994CriLJ1732; 50(1993)DLT183; 1993RLR391
ORDER IN exercise of the powers conferred by Section 19 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (37 of 1967) and. pursuant to (the Govt. of India, Ministry of Home Affairs notifications No. S.O. [906(E)] dated 10th Dec. 1992. The Lt, Governor, National Capital Territory of Delhi hereby directs that the powers under Section 7 & 8(1) of the aforesaid Act shall be exercised by the Commissioner of Police, Delhi throughout the rational Capital Territory of Delhi, with immediate effect. BY order and in the name of LT.Governor, National Capital TERRItorY of Delhi. (MRS.Pratibha Karan) HOMESecretary COPY for information and necessary action to :- 1.Secretary to the Govt. of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi, with reference to the Mha Notification No. S.O. 906(E) dt. 10-12-92. 2.Commissioner of Police, Police Headquarters, Now Delhi. 3.District Magistrate, Tis Hazari, Delhi. 4.Secretary to the Lt. Governor, Raj Niwas, Delhi. 5.PS to Chief Secretary, Delhi. (MRS.Pratibha Karan...
N. Paul and Co. Vs. Ram Kali and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-1993
Reported in: I(1995)ACC319
P.K. Bahri, J.1. This appeal is directed against order November 6, 1975, of Mr. R.N. Mehrotra, Commissioner under the Workmen's Compensation Act, awarding Rs. 8,000/- as compensation on account of death of Keshav Ram.2. The facts, in brief, as put up before the said authority under the said Act were that Keshav Ram was in employment of the appellant and while performing his duties with the appellant, he suffered injuries in an accident on February 17, 1969 and succumbed to his said injuries on February 22, 1969. He had left behind Ram Kali, his widow, two sons, namely Suraj Prakash and Ravinder and one daughter, named Lali. An amount of Rs. 50,000/- was claimed as compensation. The deceased was working as a 'jamadar' and was employed in the construction work regarding maintenance of roads and electrical fittings at Palam Airport. On the day of accident, it is alleged that he was supervising the labour at work when he was struck by a nozzle of the fire bridge at the Palam Airport which ...
Sh. Krishan Mohan Singh Vs. Sri Chand Gupta and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-1993
Reported in: AIR1993Delhi365; 50(1993)DLT239
1. This appeal is directed against the order of an Additional District Judge dated September 21, 1991 by which he had recalled the previous order made on the basis of the statements made by the parties in Court.2. Facts, in brief, are that Sri Chand Gupta, respondent No. 1, had brought a suit for injunction against the appellant taking the plea that he is the tenant in the premises in question and the appellant is threatening to raise unauthorised constructions which would effect his demised premises. A temporary injunction was granted by the Lower Court and appeal was brought against that order which came up for hearing before Shri V.S. Aggarwal, Additional District Judge.3. On July 16, 1988, a joint statement of Shri J.K. Seth, Advocate for the appellant and Shri J.K. Jain, Advocate for the respondents, Sri Chand Gupta, Chand Narain Pandey and Narinder Singh and of Sri Chand, respondent No. 1, and Krishan Mohan Singh, appellant, was recorded which is to the following effect :--'The m...
Bharat Steel Tubes Vs. State of Bihar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-1993
Reported in: 1993(2)ARBLR120(Delhi); II(1993)BC586; 50(1993)DLT577
P.K. Bahri, J. (1) This appeal is directed against order dates 27/05/1974, of the Sub-Judge, Delhi, by which he had accepted the objections filed by the respondent and had set aside the award.(2) It appears that taking resort to the arbitration clauses 20 & 21appearing in the printed terms at the back of the bills issued by the appellant to the respondent the appellant appointed Shri S.N. Kumar as Arbitrator and despite notice to the respondent the State of Bihar did not appoint any Arbitrator and the State of Bihar also did not appear before the Arbitrator and the Arbitrator gave the award dated 6/08/1970, by virtue of which he awarded Rs. 16, 144/47 to the appellant as price of the goods supplied to the respondent and also filed the award in the Court taking resort under Section 14(2) of the Arbitration Act. Notice of the filing of the award was issued to both the parties and the respondent-State of Bihar filed the objections under Sections 30 & 33 of the Arbitration Act.(3) It was p...
Pradeep Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-1993
Reported in: 1993(25)DRJ574
Sat Pal, J. (1) The petitioner had earlier filed Cr.M(M) bearing No-424/93 for grant of interim bail for a period of one month on the ground of marriage of his daughter Ms. Ranjeeta in the case Fir No.312/92 P.S. Punjabi Bagh under Section 307/323/302/34 IPC. In this petition, it was stated that the petitioner had already been granted interim bail by Shri Kuldeep Singh, Addl. Sessions Judge, Delhi vide order dated 15th February, 1993 in another case pending against the petitioner pertaining to Fir No.129/91P.S. Hari Nagar, under Sections 21/61/85 NDPS Act. A copy of the order dated 15th February, 1993 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge was annexed with that petition.(2) In the other case i.e. Fir No.312/92, Shri M.L. Sawhney, learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Delhi by his order dated 18th February, 1993 had rejected the application for bail and it was stated in this order that in view of the statement made by the 1.0. that the petitioner had committed another murder while he was on...
Jayashree Bijwe Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-1993
Reported in: 51(1993)DLT226; 1993(26)DRJ347
Santosh Duggal, J.(1) The petitioner, was taken as a Senior Scientific Officer Grade-11 by the Indian Institute of Technology, (IIT for short), for the Centre known as I.T.M.M.E.C. Centre pursuant to an advertisement being No.7/86. The petitioner pleads that she held at the time a degree of M.Tech in Modem Methods of Chemical Analysis and Control from Iit, Delhi, and. that in the advertisement, referred to above, following areas for which appointment was supposed to be considered were indicated: 1.Lubricants and Lubrication. 2. Friction and wear, 3. Condition Monitoring and Maintenance Engineering. 4. Performance diagnostics and dynamics.(2) The petitioner contends that this advertisement did not indicate that the post was of a temporary nature, and accordingly in terms of the statute of the Iit it was deemed to be in respect to a permanent post, and on that assumption, the petitioner applied, and after due selection process by a statutory Selection Committee, was selected for the afor...
Laxmi Iron and Steel Manufacturing Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Prem Ckoaa
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-1993
Reported in: 50(1993)DLT486; 1993(27)DRJ115; 1993RLR424
Santosh Duggal, J.(1) This is tenant's Revision Petition under Section 25-B, Sub-section (8) of Delhi Rent Control Act (for short, the Act) against the order of eviction passed on 24-4-1991 in respect of the tenancy premises, comprising the 1st and 2nd Floor of property bearing No. C-549, defense Colony, New Delhi, on landlord/respondents' eviction petition filed on the ground of bona fide personal requirement, under Clause (e) of Proviso to Section 14 (1) of the Act. (2) The facts briefly are that the property bearing No. C549, defense Colony, was purchased by the respondent on 30.12.1981. He was already in possession of the ground floor whereas the petitioner was a tenant in possession of the first floor and second floor Along with one servant quarter in the second floor. The Eviction Petition was filed in the year 1987 after the expiry of the period of five years from the date of purchase, during which the landlord was debarred from filing an eviction petition on the ground of bona ...
Bimla Devi and ors. Vs. Sakirti Devi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-1993
Reported in: 1993ACJ995; 50(1993)DLT282
Usha Mehra, J.(1) Bimla Devi & Ors. have filed an appeal under Section 110-D of the Motor Vehicle Act (hereinafter called the Act) against the judgment of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (hereinafter called theM.A.C.T.) dated 28-2-78. In short the facts of the case are that Pt. BehariLal died in motor car accident on 14-6-70 at about 7.00 a.m. The deceased was crossing Mehrauli Road on foot on the pedestrian crossing from RajNagar side towards South Extension. At that time his son was also accompanying him at some distance. The offending Car No. DLR-7284driven rashly, recklessly and negligently by Bhim Sen, respondent No.2,came at a very fast speed from Yusuf Sarai and hit the deceased with the front portion as a result of which he was thrown away and sustained fatalinjuries. At that juncture there was a Red signal, but the respondent No. 2did not care to stop on the Red signal, instead entered the crossing without caring for the safety of the persons. He did not observe proper look...
Delhi Paints and Chemicals Vs. New Delhi Municipal Committee and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-1993
Reported in: 50(1993)DLT207; 1993(25)DRJ548; 1993RLR436
D.P. Wadhwa, J. (1) Since we have heard the matter at length the writ petitions can be disposed of at this stage itself. (2) These five writ petitions raise a common question of law. The question is as to what would the annual value of the properties subject-matter of these petitions under clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 (for short 'the Act') as applicable to New Delhi. The assessment year is 1991-92 (1 April 1991 to 31 March 1992). The properties involved are flats situated in multi-storeyed buildings in New Delhi area where the Act applies. (3) To understand the issues involved in these petitions it will be appropriate to set out the facts of only one of these cases. The petitioner in C.W-P.No. 1032/92 owns flat in Surya Kiran Building at Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi. The flat has been let out at a monthly rent of Rs.4,316.00. The New Delhi Municipal Committee (N.D.M.C.), the first respondent issued a notice under section 65 of the Act ...
Bimla Devi and ors. Vs. Savitri Devi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-1993
Reported in: I(1993)ACC645
Usha Mehra, J.1. Bimla Devi and Ors. have filed an appeal under Section 110-D of the Motor Vehicle Act (hereinafter called the Act) against the judgment of the Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal (hereinafter called the M.A.C.T.) dated 28.2.78. In short the facts of the case are that Pt. Behari Lal died in motor car accident on 14.6.70 at about 7.00 a.m. The deceased was crossing Mehrauli Road on foot on the pedestrain crossing from Raj Nagar side towards South Extension. At that time his son was also accompanying him at some distance. The offending Car No. DLK-7284 driven rashly, recklessly and negligently by Bhim Sen, respondent No. 2, came at a very fast speed from Yusuf Sarai and hit the deceased with the front portion as a result of which he was thrown away and sustained fatal injuries. At that juncture there was a Red signal, but the respondent No. 2 did not care to stop on the Red signal, instead entered the crossing without caring for the safety of the persons. He did not observe pr...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »