Delhi Court March 1993 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A.K. Mukherjee Vs. State and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-1993
Reported in: 1993CriLJ2363; 50(1993)DLT169; 1993RLR255
R.L. Gupta, J.(1) This petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Code for short) for setting aside and quashing the order dated24.3.1990 of the learned M.M. and the order dated 21.10.1992 of the learnedASJ, New Delhi.(2) I have heard learned Counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner had filed a complaint under Sections 63 to 70 of the Copyright Act. 1957(Act for short) against the second respondent M/s. S. Chand & Co. Ltd. and its Managing Director S.L. Gupta for infringement of his copyright. Along with the complaint he also appended a decision of the Copyright Board in which a finding was given by the Board that without doubt the respondents were guilty of infringing the petitioner's copyright and that the claim of the petitioner was just and rightful. It appears that S.L. Gupta expired later on.Therefore the petitioner filed an application under Section 319 of the Code read with Section 69 of the ...
D.C.M. Data Products Vs. M/S. Direct Flight Courier and Another
Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-1993
R.N. Mittal, President: 1. Briefly the facts are that the complainant is carrying on the business of manufacturing and selling of new generation computers and other allied electronic products. Opp. Party No.1 M/s. Direct Flight Courier Service is carrying on the business of carrying of goods and Opp. Party No.2 is the properietor of Opp. Party No.1. The complainant entrusted a consignment of twenty packages valued at Rs. 2,43,000/- to the Opp. Party No. 1 on 30th November, 1991, for delivery to M/s. Telco, Jamshedpur through DPMD Asansole on 'Door Delivery Basis' vide Challan No. 593 dated 29.11.1991. The Opp. Parties as per terms and conditions of the delivery were required to deliver the consignment within three to five days w.e.f. 30th November, 1991 and to give the proof of delivery thereof to the complainant within 10 days from 30th November, 1991. It is pleaded that inspite of repeated requests and reminders, orally and in writing, consignment has not been delivered to the consi...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›