Delhi Court February 1993 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Neeru Gambhir and ors. Vs. New India Insurance Co. and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-1993
Reported in: 1(1994)ACC673
P.N. Nag, J.1. The appellant has filed this appeal against the judgment of Shri P.R. Thakur, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Delhi, dated 21st October, 1981, whereby on the basis of the alleged compromise between the parties he has awarded compensation under Section 110A of the Motor Vehicles Act.2. The facts of the case are that on 26th June, 1974, the husband of the petitioner Shri Sham Sunder Gambhir accompanied by his mother Smt. Hemi Bai and baby daughter, Kumari Rakhi Gambhir, while traveling by a Mini Bus No. DIP-5605 from Inter State Bus Terminal at Kashmiri Gate, Delhi and going to his house at Geeta Colony across river Jamuna, met with an accident on Pushta Road near Shamshan Ghat, when another Mini Bus No. DIP-4780 coming from Jheel side collided with their bus. As a result of the accident, the husband of the petitioner Shri Sham Sunder Gambhir and others sustained injuries. In the case of Sham Sunder the injuries proved fatal. By the petition under Section 110-A of the Moto...
indu Engineering and Textiles Ltd. Vs. Delhi Development Authority and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-1993
Reported in: 1993(1)ARBLR454(Delhi); 1993(25)DRJ182
C.M. Nayar, J. (1) This is a petition under Sections 14 and 17 of the Arbitration Act,1940,for directing Shri O.P.Goel, the sole Arbitrator in the matter,to file his award dated April 29,1989 along with all the relevant record of the case and making the Award a Rule of the Court. (2) The brief facts of the case are that by an order dated January 6, 1988, in suit No. 1094-A/87, this Court had disposed of the petition under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, and an order was made that the arbitration agreement be filed in the Court and disputes, as referred to in paragraph 14 of that petition, be referred to the arbitration in terms of the arbitration clause. The Engineer Member of the D.D.A. accordingly was directed to appoint the Arbitrator within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the order dated January 6, 1988. (3) In pursuance to the order of this Court dated January 6, 1988, the Engineer Member, D.D.A. appointed respondent no.2 as the sole Arbitrator to adjudicate u...
Manoj Singh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-1993
Reported in: 49(1993)DLT731
R.L. Gupta, J.(1) Petitioner is facing prosecution u/Section 18 of the NDPS Act for being found in possession of 206 gms. of opium 'on 16.1.1992.He applies for bail.(2) I have heard arguments advanced by the learned Counsel for theparties. The most glaring fact which appears to me to be lacking in this case is that there is no mention about the deposit of CFSL form in the Malkhana.learned Counsel for the petitioner also says that the constable who took the sample to CFSL and whose name is Laxmi Narain has not said in him statement u/Section 161 Criminal Procedure Code that he deposited CFSL form in the Malkhana. Another fact which weighs in my mind at this stage is that the article recovered is not of a very high value. Other points also have been argued but I do not consider it necessary to discuss those points.(3) Taking the totality of the circumstances into consideration. I am of the view that there seems to be some lacuna in the prosecution case,prima fade. The petitioner is, ther...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›