Delhi Court January 1993 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tapan Saha Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-04-1993
Reported in: 1993CriLJ1255; 1993(1)Crimes568; 1993(25)DRJ394
R.L. Gupta, J.(1) This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeks quashing of the order F.No.873/4/ 92-CUS.VIII dated 6th January,1992 passed under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Actives Act (COFEPOSA Act for short) by the second respondent i.e. Joint Secretary to the Govt. of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, North Block, New Delhi against the petitioner and setting him at liberty. (2) The brief facts are that the petitioner detenu was arrested on 3.11.91 at the Calcutta Airport when he arrived from Agartala by Indian Airlines flight No.1C-742. On the basis of suspicion his person was searched and 8 pieces of gold biscuits collectively weighing 932.8 grams valued Rs.4,41,680.00 approximately were recovered from his person. His statement under Section 108 of the Customs Act was recorded which of course is alleged to be extracted from him by for...
Syndicate Bank Vs. Hindustan Fibre Glass Products and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-01-1993
Reported in: 1993IVAD(Delhi)253; 52(1993)DLT389
Sat Pal, J.(1) This is a suit for recover of Rs. 2,93,572.80together with pendente lite and future interest at the rate of 20% per annum from the date of the suit till realisation.(2) The facts of the case briefly stated are that the plaintiff is a nationalised bank constituted under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 and having its head office at Manipal in South Kanara, District Karnataka State and having one of its branches at Bijwasan, New Delhi. Shri U.V. Mahaya is the General Attorney/Principal Officer/Manager at Bijwasan, New Delhi branch of theplaintiff-bank. He is duly authorised to sign and verify the present plaint and to institute the present suit. In this regards he holds the power of attorney from the plaintiff-bank.(3) As per the averments made in the plaint defendant No. 1 which is a partnership concern of defendants 2 & 3 were granted financial accommodation to the extent of Rs. 1.90,000.00 and in this connection the agreement of...
Orient Abrasives Ltd. Vs. Hariganga Alloys and Steels Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-01-1993
Reported in: 1993IVAD(Delhi)150; 52(1993)DLT416
Sat Pal, J. (1) This is a suit for recovery of Rs. 1,75,459.60 together with the interest and costs.(2) Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the plaintiff is a limited company duly incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at 1212, Chiranjiv Tower, 43 Nehru Place, New Delhi-110 019.Mr.K.B. Rathi who has signed and verified the plaint is the General Manager(Commercial) of the plaintiff-company and is duly authorised to institute and verified the plaint on behalf of the plaintiff company vide resolution dated 29/06/1989. The extracts of the aforesaid letter is Ex. Public Witness 1/1.(3) It has been stated in the plaint that the plaintiff-company is in the business of inter alias acquiring mines to quary. deal in all grades, types and qualities of various metals including magnesite bricks, minerals etc. The defendant company is also a limited company having its registered office at Old Motor Stand, Itwari, Nagpur-400 008 and having a steel plant. It ...
Arvind Kumar and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-01-1993
Reported in: 1993IVAD(Delhi)398; 52(1993)DLT238
V.B. Bansal, J.(1) The short question for decision in this application,viz. CM. 6475/93 is as to whether the respondents 3 & 4. i.e. Directorate of Training and Technical Education and Government of the National Capital Region of Delhi can restrict the admission of 85 per cent of the joint seats to the students of Delhi to the Pharmacy Course in Maharaja Surajmal Institute of Pharmacy, respondent No. 2, as provided in Clause 5 of the prospectus for the year 1983-84 for admission to Engineering and Pharmacy Courses for Government/privately managed institutions, issued by respondent No. 3.(2) S/S. Arvind Kumar and Satender Kumar have filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the respondents in which it has inter aha been pleaded that Clause (5) of the aforesaidprospectus, providing for reservation of 85 per cent of the seats for the students of Delhi, in the Institutions located in the National Capital Region of Delhi for the year 1993-94 may be quashed, bei...
Haren P. Chowksey Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-01-1993
Reported in: 1993IIIAD(Delhi)956; 52(1993)DLT145; 1993RLR586
V.B. Bansal, J.(1) Haren P. Chowksey, petitioner, has filed this writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India with a prayer to issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ and to set aside the order passed by the Customs Excise & Gold (Central) Appellate Tribunal,respondent No. 4.(2) The Additional Collector of Customs, respondent No. 3, vide orderdated 26.2.1991 had imposed a penalty of Rs. 3,00,000.00 upon the petitioner which on appeal was reduced to Rs. l,00,000.00 by respondent No. 4 video order dated 8.9.1922.(3) An information was received by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence that a German Make Mercedez Benz car bearing Registration No.DBB-782 being used by Shri Shally Thapar, residing at E-30, GreaterKailash-11, New Delhi, was neither legally imported into the country nor was any duty paid on it at the time of its importation into the country. Detailed enquiries were made which revealed that this car was registered at Delhi on the basis of a no-ob...
Daljit Singh Sandhu Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-01-1993
Reported in: 1993IIIAD(Delhi)879; 1993(3)Crimes629; 51(1993)DLT667
S.C. Jain, J.(1) The petitioner has challenged the detention order passed against him under Section 3(1) read with Section 2(f)(f) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act,1974 (in short COFEPOSA) on 8-10-1992 by filing this criminal writ petition.(2) As per the facts available on record, the petitioner was intercepted on 19-5-1992 at I.G.I. Airport, New Delhi when he was leaving for Dubai and as a result of search of his baggage, foreign currency equivalent tors. 9,19,058.25 was recovered. On 20-5-1992 the residence of the petitioner was also searched, but nothing incriminating was recovered. On 6-6-1992 a complaint under Sections 132 and 135(1)(a) of the Customs Act was filed against the petitioner and the petitioner was granted bail by the Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi on 7-7-1992. Departmental proceedings were started against the petitioner and a show cause notice was issued on26-8-1992 and on 8-10-1992 this detention order was passe...
Rajendra Kumar Tandon Vs. Rahabar Production Pvt. Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-01-1993
Reported in: 52(1993)DLT222; 1993RLR555
V.B. Bansal, J.(1) This order will dispose of this revision petition field by Mr. Rajendra Kumar Tandon against the order dated 4 5.92 of ShriS.M. Gupla, Rent Controller, Delhi, thereby dismissing the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 14(c) of the Delhi Rent Control (Amendment)Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the Act.(2) Briefly stated, the facts leading to the filing of this petition are that the ground floor of the premises bearing No. G-47, Kirti Nagar, New Delhi,comprising of two bed-rooms, one drawing room, one dining room, onekitchen, one pantry, two bathrooms-cum-WCs. and open court-yard were Jet out to the respondent by late Shri D.R. Tandon, father of the petitioner, in November 1963, on payment of monthly rent of Rs. 310.00. The petitioner claimed himself to be the owner and landlord of the premises on the basis of a Will dated 6.2.1981 of his father.(3) It was claimed by the petitioner that his family consisted of himself his wife, one son and a daughter. H...
Batliboi and Co. Ltd. Vs. N.K. Verma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-01-1993
Reported in: 50(1993)DLT443
S.C. Jain, J.(1) Briefly stated the facts giving rise to these two applications being LA. 9737/92 and 10514/92 are that Batliboi & Co., herein,after called the applicant took on rent property 142, Golf Links New Delhi consisting of first floor with terrace, barasti, one servant quarter and garage together with fixtures and fittings for a period of three years on a monthly rent of Rs. 1500.00 vide lease agreement dated 1.3.1977 from Shri N.K. Verma,owner-landlord. After expiry of three years, the applicant continued to be tenant in the said property on the same terms and conditions, except that rate of rent was increased from Rs. 1500.00 to R.s.2,200.00. Rent of these premises stands paid up to August, 1993. These premises have been used as guesthouse of the applicant.(2) As per the averments made in the plaint, on 15.7.1992 at 2 p.m.the owner-landlord brought 30 bad elements/gondas to the tenanted premises and started throwing the furniture and other valuable belongings of the applican...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›