Delhi Court December 1992 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jayshree Ravi and Another Vs. University of Delhi and Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-14-1992
Reported in: 1993(25)DRJ303
ORDERMahinder Narain, J.1. Rule D. B.2. By consent of parlies, we have heard the matter on merits.3. By this writ petition, Jayashree Ravi and Anil Kaushal question the legality and virus of a condition imposed by the University of Delhi in the matter of eligibility of the persons to take an entrance examination for the 3 Year LL.B. course conducted by the University of Delhi through its Law Faculty.4. It is stated in the petition that Jayashree Ravi did obtain a degree in B.A. from the University of DeIhi(10+2+3) scheme in the year 1983, having passed the B.A. examination in the third division.5. It is also stated in the petition that Anil Kaushal did obtain B.Com. (Pass) degree in the Year 1980, having passed the examination held for that purpose by the University of Delhi, in the third division.6. Jayashree Ravi holds a degree dated 24-03-1984, and Anil Kaushal holds a degree dated 28-02-1991.7. It is stated in the petition that on 22-06-1992, the respondent University issued an adv...
Shashi Mangla Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-1992
Reported in: 1996RLR87
M.K. Sharama, J.(1) This is an application praying for review of order dated 10.7.1995 passed in Cwp 2439/95 and Cm 4095/95 dismissing the W.P. of the petitioner.(2) The grievance of the petitioner in the Writ petition was that respondents No. 5 to 10 wrongfully claimed certain charges towards duty of Central Excise, which the petitioner 'had to ultimately pay. According to the petitioner the said amount had been paid to respondents 2 to 4 under the provisions of Central Excise and Salt Act as well as Central Sales Tax Act. On hearing Mr. R.K. Mongia the GPA. holder of the petitioner, this court by order 10.7.1995 dismissed the w.p. holding that since respondent No. 2 to 10 are all at Bombay, it is appropriate that such a w.p. should have been filed in Bombay High Court. (3) The petitioner now through this review petition urged before us that since respondent No. 1 is located at Delhi and is also the sole beneficiary of the amount of duty of Excise and Central Sales Tax collected and d...
Adwave Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-1992
Reported in: 2003(25)DRJ455
V.B. Bansal, J.(1) The plaintiff has filed this Suit for recovery of Rs.l,33,089.00 with pendentelite interest @ 18 per cent per annum and future interest on the decretal amount @18 per cent per annum till realisation, with costs. Defendant No.1 is the Lt. Governor of the Union Territory of Delhi; Defendant No.2 is Delhi Administration, Union Territory of Delhi through its Chief Secretary; while the defendant No.3 is the Commissioner of Police, Delhi Administration, Union Territory of Delhi.(2) The plaintiff is a partnership firm, registered under the Indian Partnership Act, carrying on business inter alias of construction of building and publicity agents. Ms. Komal G.B. Singh is one of the partners and Managing Partner of the plaintiff firm, who is competent and authorised to file the suit and sign and verify the pleadings. (3) Briefly stated, the averments made in the plaint are:- (4) That the work of construction of Delhi Police pavilion at Pragati Maidan, New Delhi, was entrusted t...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›