Delhi Court February 1991 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union Carbide (India) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-1991
Reported in: (1991)(33)ECC55
1.1 Metals and Ors. Co. (a Division of Union Carbide India Ltd.) were availing of the benefit of notification No. 276/67 dated 21.12.67 in respect of Toluene which was obtained by them under Chapter X Procedure of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 for utilisation in the manufacture of chemical formulation known as C.P. 3 coating. The provisions of this notification were being availed of by the appellants right from 1967. Later on the Collector by the order-in-original No. 14(26A)80/Collr.-69/81 dated 1.5.81 has denied the benefit in respect of Toluene of the said notification on the following ground: Having considered all the facts and circumstances of the case, the report of the Chemical Examiner, the mode of manufacture of product in dispute i.e. C.P. 3 coating, its application as a coating material by roller coating technique and the Chemical composition I hold that the product bears similarity to varnishes and is classifiable as 'allied materials' occurring in the Notification No. 35...
Shortprints Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-1991
Reported in: (1991)(35)LC152Tri(Delhi)
1. This appeal concerns a film titled "Samasyasuli" produced in Kannada. The Assistant Collector classified the film under item No.37II(iii) of the First Schedule to the Central Excises arid Salt Act, 1944 (the Schedule is referred to hereinafter as the 'CET') rejecting the appellants' claim for item No. 37II(i). An appeal against this order was dismissed by the Collector (Appeals). Hence the present appeal.3. The certificate issued on 1.10.1981 by the Central Board of Film Censors certifies the film (Samasyasuli) as a documentary and of gauge 35 mm and length 603.90 metre. We arc concerned in the present appeal not with the 35 mm format but the film in the 16 mm format. The certificate has also a note to the following effect: In the event of a copy of the film being prepared in a gauge other than that mentioned in the certificate, the certified length shall be deemed to be the corresponding length appropriate to that gauge.It is a matter of common sense, and needs no argument, to com...
Surinder Singh Ahluwalia Vs. Delhi Special Police Establishment and Ot ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-1991
Reported in: 1991CriLJ2583; ILR1991Delhi228
M.C. Jain, C.J.1. By this writ petition, the petitioner Shri Surinder Singh Ahluwalia, at present the Chief Secretary to the Govt. of Nagaland, seeks to quash the FIR No. RC-1/87-ACU(I) dated 24-3-1987 registered by Delhi Special Police Establishment under section 5(2) read with Section 5(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 and the investigation pursuant to the said First Information Report. 2. We may state a few relevant facts leading to the present writ petition. The petitioner was commissioned on 3-5-1964 as an Emergency Commission Officer in the Army when he was officiating Captain in the Army, he appeared in the IAS and other Central Government Services Competitive Examination held in 1968 by the Union Public Service Commission. The petitioner was inducted in the IAS Cadre having regard to his order of merit, and was allocated to the State of Nagaland. From 1971 to 1987, the petitioner served in various capacities as under :- '(a) Under Secretary, Supply Department, Go...
Nazir Ahmed Wani and anr. Vs. State and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-1991
Reported in: 43(1991)DLT571; I(1991)DMC499; 1991(21)DRJ4
Arun B. Saharya, J.(1) By this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the petitioners have prayed that the proceedings against them pending in the Court of Shri R.C.Yaduvanshi, Metropolitan Magistrate. Delhi in pursuance of Fir No. 83/89, P.S.Chandni Mahal under Section 498A/406, Indian Penal Code be quashed.(2) Nazir, petitioner No.1, is the son of Gulam Rasool, petitioner No 2. They are residents of Srinagar, Kashmir Nazir contracted a marriage with Husnbano. respondent No. 2 on 20th of June 1987 according to Hanafi Mohammdan Law which unfortunately floundered. She left the matrimonial home in October 1987 and came to Delhi where a daughter was born to her on 5th of April 1988. Husnbano lodged an FIR. on 6th of April 1989 The Dowry Cell took up the investigation. Prosecution was instituted against the petitioners. The case is at an initial stage. The charge has yet to be framed.(3) During investigation, the petitioners moved the Sessions Judge for anticip...
Shashi Kant Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-1991
Reported in: 43(1991)DLT622
V.B. Bansal, J.(1) Shashi Kant has filed this appeal under Section 449 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the order dated 23rd October 1990 of an Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi. Vide impugned order the learned Addl Sessions Judge has forfeited the amount of the bail bond and imposed penalty of Rs. 10,000.00 on the appellant. The appellant has also been ordered to undergo civil imprisonment for six months on account of his inability to make payment of the amount of the bail bond. (2) The appellant is stated to have stood surety for an accused in caw F.I.R. No. 178 of 1990 of Police Station Kamla Market, New Delhi in the sum ofRs.10,000.00 and undertook to pay the said amount in case of default of appearance of the said accused. Since the accused did not appear, the appellant was asked to be present in Court and thereafter the impugned order was passed (3) I have heard the learned counsel for the appellant. It has bee stated by the counsel for appellant that there has been a com...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›