Delhi Court April 1989 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gunjit Singh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-1989
Reported in: 1989(17)DRJ25
Bahri, J.(1) These four petitions seeking anticipatory bail for the petitioners arise from the case registered of February 9, 1989, for the offences punishable under Sections 120-B read with Sections 193, 367 & 471 of the Indian Penal Code.(2) The facts, in brief, are that a case under Section 5(1)(e) read with Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, was registered as far back as on October 3, 1985, against Gunjit Singh, who was then working as Inspecting Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax (Audit), New Delhi. It was alleged in that case that he had acquired assets through corrupt and dubious means which were disproportionate to the known sources of his income. In the house search, besides various other documents and articles seized Rs. 7,30,283.00 in cash were also seized. The investigation in that case was continuing and I am told that a challan has been recently filed. One case under the Arms Act and another case under the Excise Act were also registered against him...
Kailash Chand Vs. Ganpat Rai
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-1989
Reported in: 39(1989)DLT120; 1989(17)DRJ14; 1989RLR274
M.K. Chawla, J.(1) The present appeal is directed against the Judgment of the Rent Control Tribunal, Delhi dated 17th March, 1981, whereby the appellant sub-tenant, has been allowed to be proceeded against for an action for his eviction from the premises situated in the slum area, as defined in the Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Slum Areas Act) without seeking prior permission of the competent authority under Section 19 of the Act.(2) The facts are not in dispute. Lala Ganpat Rai, respondent was a thekedar (contractor) of the entire house no. 4530, Daiwara, Nai Sarak, Delhi with the right to let and sub-let the whole or a part thereof to a third person. Kailash Chand, the appellant, was in occupation of a portion of the first floor of the said house as a sub-tenant at the rate of Rs. 20.40 per mensem. Sometime back in the year 1972, Ganpat Rai filed an application under Section 19 of the Slum Areas Act, seeking permission from the Compe...
Ashok @ Billoo and anr. Vs. State (Delhi Administration)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-1989
Reported in: 38(1989)DLT173
Malik Sharief-ud-din, J.(1) Sat Pal appellant in criminal appeal No. 27 of 1986 Ashok and Prem Singh appellants in criminal appeal No. 42/1986 have been convicted under section 302/34, section 323/34, Indian Penal Code, and sentenced to imprisonment for life under section 302/34 Indian Penal Code and to the payment of fine of Rs. 500.00 each, in default of which they are to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for six months. They have also been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months under section 323/34 IPC. Sat Pal appellant was also convicted u/s 27 of the Indian Arms Act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year. All the sentences have been made concurrent. The appellants have made a grievance against these orders of conviction and sentence dated 30.1.1986 and 31.1.1986 respectively. (2) The facts are that on 16.10.1982 at about 8.30 P.M. the appellants came to the shop of one Dhruv, a panwalla. This shop was situated in front of the house No. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›