Skip to content

Delhi Court February 1989 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Feb 01 1989

Ramat Massy Vs. Arvind Construction Company (Pvt.) Ltd. and Another

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-01-1989

Reported in: [1989(58)FLR626]; (1989)IILLJ397Del

1. By an agreement dated 30th April 1984 between Silvester Massey and M/s. Arvind Construction Company (Pvt.) Ltd. the appellant was appointed as a Mechanic-Helper for working in Iraq on the construction contract being performed by the respondents in Iraq. The respondents-company booked the air passage of the appellant to Iraq and the appellant joined the company's service in Iraq on 17th May 1984. He died on 21st August 1984 in Iraq. A claim petition is filed by his father under the Workmen's Compensation Act before the Commissioner under Workmen's Compensation Act, Delhi. At the time of admission this court directed the appellant to produce a copy of the provisions similar to Workmen's Compensation Act, prevalent in Iraq. They are filed by the appellant and are taken on record. 2. Through the impugned order the Commissioner has disposed of a preliminary issue raised by the respondents, namely : 'Whether this court has jurisdiction to entertain the claim in view of the preliminary obj...


Feb 01 1989

Nand Kishore Katyal Vs. Bank of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-01-1989

Reported in: ILR1989Delhi69

B.N. Kirpal, J.(1) The challenge in this writ petition is to the punishment imposed on the petitioner pursuant to disciplinary proceedings which were held against him. (2) Briefly stated the facts are that in the year 1973 the petitioner was appointed as the Manager of the newly opened Branch of respondent No. I During his tenure as a Manager of the said branch, he sanctioned a hypothecation loan of Rs. 20,000 on 15th September, 1976 in favor of M/s. Texline Agencies. According to the petitioner, the stock of the said firm at that time was of the value of Rs. 62,057.73. On 5th November, 1976 this account was closed and a fresh pledge account was sanctioned by the petitioner for Rs. 50,000. The case of the petitioner is that at that time M/s Texline Agencies had stock worth Rs. 79578.00 which was kept in the Bank. On 31st January, 1977 another hypothecation loan of Rs. 20,0001- was sanctioned against the value of the stock in the show room of Texline Agencies which was stated to be wort...



AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial