Delhi Court April 1987 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
V.K. Mishra and Another Vs. Central Registrar of Co-operative Societie ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-1987
Reported in: [1990]68CompCas380(Delhi)
S.N. Sapra, J.1. By this petition, filed under article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners seek to challenge the show-cause notice dated July, 14, 1986, issued by respondent No. 1 (Central Registrar of Co-operative Societies) under section 48 of the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 1984. The petition have prayed for the issue of appropriate writ, order or directions calling for the records pertaining to the issuance of the impugned show-cause notice and quashing the same. The petitioners have also claimed the relief of issue of directions to respondent No. 2 to immediately hold elections of the office bearers to the board of directors of respondent No. 3. 2. Originally, civil writ petition was filed by two petitioners, namely, V. K. Misra and Thampan Thomas. After issue of the rule, an application, being C.M. No. 24 of 1987, was moved by Pallipose Thomas and Shambhu Bhai Ballab Bhai Patel, under Order 1, rule 10, read with section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure...
J.S. Virk Vs. R.D. Pradhan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-1987
Reported in: 32(1987)DLT97
S. Ranganathan, J. (1) The petitioners in Ccp 82/86 and 176/86 came to this court with the complaint that the respondents have failed to implement the judgment of this court in C.W. 44/75 dated 2.9. 1985 and that they should be directed to do so forthwith. There have been some developments since the filing of Ccp 82/86 and, before referring to these developments and examining how well-founded the petitioners' grievances are, it is necessary to give a brief resume of some salient facts of the controversy C.W. 44/45. (2) The writ petition raised a question of seniority among Company Commanders in the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF). The hierarchy of posts in the service relevant for our consideration is as follows with Commandants at the top and Company Commanders at the bottom : (I)Commandants (CO) (Non-Selection Grade) (ii) Assistant Commandants (Second-in-Command) I (AC-210 (iii) Assistant Commandants (AC) (iv) Company Commanders (CC) Of these the post at (ii) is not really a prom...
Rup Chand Vs. Shanti Devi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-1987
Reported in: 32(1987)DLT269; 1987RLR415
Leila Seth, J.(1) This appeal by the tenant, Mr. Rup Carnd, is directed against the judgment and order of the Rent Control Tribunal dated 27/02/1985 confirming the order of the additional Rent Controller dated 8/07/1985.(2) The main question in issue before me is whether the tenant has acquired 'vacant possession of, or been allotted, a residence'.(3) On 26/05/1976, landlady, Ms. Shanti Devi filed a petition under section 14(1)(a) and (h) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') to eject Rup Chand. Thereafter, on 27/07/1976,Rup Chand filed his written statement.(4) The following facts, pertaining to section 14(1)(.h) of the Act, have been pleaded in the petition. In paragraph 18(a)(iii) of the petition, it is stated, 'That the Respondent has acquired vacant alternative accommodation situated opposite Nagar Nigam Middle School, Circular Road, JwalaNagar, Delhi'. In paragraph 4 of the said petition, it is mentioned that the disputed premises being H.No. ...
Baleshwar Prashad Vs. Commissioner of Police and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-1987
Reported in: 1988CriLJ1127
ORDERM.K. Chawala, J.1.The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order of the respondent 1, SHO, Police Station, Delhi Cantt. for opening of the history sheet of the petitioner and entering his name in the Surveillance Register and confirmed by respondent 2, the Deputy Commissioner of Police, South District. He also seeks the issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to remove the entry from the Police Surveillance Register and to close the history sheet opened for him.2. The circumstances as disclosed in the petition and relevant for the consideration of the points raised, in brief, are that the petitioner is a law abiding agriculturist. It is his case that the Police Officers of the Police Station Delhi Cantt. used to make unreasonable demands of money from him and for that purpose they started making calls at his house at odd hours. After sometime, the petitioner refused to comply the...
S.A.i.L. Rourkela Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-1987
Reported in: (1987)(12)LC72Tri(Delhi)
1. These are bunch of appeals filed by the appellant company against the orders of Collector of Central Excise and Customs, Calcutta, on the question of correct classification of Steel Castings. These were originally a part of an application for revision filed before the Government of India. On the setting up of this Tribunal these have been transferred here and are being heard as an appeal.2. Appellants have claimed exemption under Notification No. 152/77-CE, dated 18th June, 1977, as amended by Notification No. 235/77-CE, dated 15th July, 1977 read with Notification No. 198/76-CE, dated 16th June, 1976, as amended.3. Appellants have claimed that they manufacture Steel Castings from scrap arising in the pipe plant which is duty paid alongwith scrap arising in the casting foundry. It is claimed that they were, therefore, manufacturing steel castings from fresh unused steel melting scrap on which duty has already been paid. Accordingly, they have claimed that they should not be liable ...
Common Cause and ors. Vs. Delhi Municipal Corporation and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-1987
Reported in: 32(1987)DLT27
B.N. Kirpal, J. (1) In this writ petition the challenge is to the demand of electricity charges raised by the respondents against the petitioners Nos. 2 to 6. (2) Petitioner No. 2 Shri R.N. Vasudeva is the owner of House No. 1/12, Shanti Niketan, New Delhi. There was an electricity meter which was installed at the said premises. On 7th May, 1984 he received a bill for Rs. 38,654.74 from respondent No. 2 for the period from 15th November, 1976 to 1st January, 1978. According to the respondents two meters installed at the said house had stopped from 15th November, 1976 and 1st January 1978 and that they had been replaced respectively on 1st March, 1984 and 15th December, 1983. It is after the replacement of the meters that the respondents worked out the consumption on a hypothetical basis and raised the aforesaid demand. No redress was received except that the demand was modified to Rs. 36,8'8.79. This amount has been paid by this petitioner to the respondent because otherwise there was ...
Madan Lal Sharma and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-1987
Reported in: 32(1987)DLT23
B.N. Kirpal, J.(1) This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by 14 different petitioners and it was inter alias prayed in the writ petition that the lands from which they were originally being evicted should be restored to them. (2) It appears that the petitioners were living in a colony called Vinod Nagar. This colony is stated to have been in existence since 1965 when plots were purchased by the petitioners from a coloniser. Houses were then alleged to have been constructed on the plots so purchased. It is an admitted fact that this colony was (3) In December, 1975, the houses had been constructed by the petitioners were demolished. They we then accommodated in resettlement colonies and 25 yards of land was allotted to each of them. I am informed that petitioners 7&12 have two plots of 25 yards each. (4) It is contended by the petitioners that there were number of other colonies which were unauthorised but which were regularised. It is further the case of the...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›