Delhi Court April 1986 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Collector of Central Excise Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-1986
Reported in: (1988)LC614Tri(Delhi)
1. This is an appeal filed by the Collector of Central Excise, Kanpur against Order-in-Appeal No.415/CE/KAP/85 dated 12.4.85 passed by the Collector of Customs and Central Excise (Appeals), New Delhi.2. Briefly, the facts are that on 15th December, 1980, M/s Indian Oil Corporation, Kanpur received 2 tank wagons containing 52.620 Kls. of MS at 15 centigrade which was booked to them ex-Trombay. No A.R. 3A was received for these wagons. These wagons were placed on their sidings along-with other bonded tank wagons and later on they were decanted as bonded and then finally cleared. Duty was paid on this quantity alongwith rest of out turn on 15th December, 1980. Later on, M/s IOC learnt that these tank wagons were originally booked to Jalandhar. The A.R. 3A was received at Jalandhar and it was noted that the relevant tank wagons had not been received. Accordingly, the Superintendent of Central Excise at the place of despatch issued a demand for duty on both these tank wagons and this was p...
H.L. Narula and anr. Vs. Northfield Automobiles Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-1986
Reported in: 30(1986)DLT204
B.N. Kirpal, J. (1) This is a petition under Section 433 read with Section 434 to the Companies Act filed by the petitioning creditor for the binding up of the respondent Company. (2) The respondent had taken on rent premises being Flat No. 106, Guru Ram Das Bhawan, Ranjit Nagar Commercial Complex, New Delhi at a monthly rent of Rs.3420.00 exclusive of all charges. The premises were taken on rent w.e.f. 29.6.1983. (3) It is alleged that the respondents did not pay the rent as had been agreed to by them. Consequently a petition under section 14(l)(a) of the Delhi Rent Control Act was filed. On 4th May, 1984 an order under Section 15(1) of the Delhi Rent Control Act was passed, directing the respondent company to pay or deposit in Court the rent payable in respect of the said premises. The order under Section 15(1) was not complied with and consequence the offence of be respondent was struck off under Section 15(7) of the Delhi Rent Control Act. Thereafter an eviction order was passed on...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›