Delhi Court March 1986 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tax Recovery Officer Xvi, New Delhi, and Others Vs. Punjab and Sind Ba ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-1986
Reported in: [1986]161ITR220(Delhi)
M.K. Chawla, J.1. Punjab & Sind Bank is the plaintiff in a suit for recovery of Rs. 22,76,091.85 against defendant No. 1, M/S. Gold Field Manufacturing Company, and its two partners defendants, Nos. 2. and 3. The suit is under the provision of Order xxxvII of the Code of Civil Procedure. As per the averments, the defendants were allowed the availment of cash credit hypothecation limited to the extent of Rs. 7,50,000 and a bill purchase/discounting limit to the extent of Rs. 3,75,000 on their furnishing and executing the loan documents consisting of demand promissory note, Form No. 106 agreeing that the facility would continue according to the bank's pleasure, Form No. 56 agreeing that the promissory note shall remain as a security with the bank for the repayment of the entire balance amount, Form No. 216 stating that the amounts would not be utilised for any purpose connected with or incidental to that of agriculture, Form No. 219 agreeing to pay interest at 2.05% per annum in addition...
J.R.D. Tata Vs. Payal Kumar and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-1986
Reported in: 1987CriLJ447; 1986(2)Crimes449; 1986(11)DRJ49
J.D. Jain, J.(1) All the above mentioned Criminal Revision Petitions. are directed against order dated 23rd April, 1982 of a Metropolitan Magistrate, summoning the above mentioned petitioners in a complaint case under Sections 406 & 477A read with Section 120B, Indian Penal Code.(2) The facts giving rise to the above mentioned revision petitions in brief are that Shri J.R.D Tata. petitioner in Cr. R.No. 170/82, is the Chairman of M/s. Tata Iron & Steel Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'the Company'). Rusi Mody, petitioner in Cr. R. No. 179/82 is the Managing Director of the Company while P.S. Prasad and Sujit Gupta, petitioner in Cr. R. No. 178/82, are the Sales Manager and Regional Director respectively of the Company. At the relevant time P.S. Prasad was Manager Sales and Sujit Gupta was Regional Director of the Company. M/s. Amin Chand Bhola Nath, which was a partnership firm (respondent No. 2 in all the above mentioned revision petitions) comprising Suresh Kumar, Mukesh ...
Pritam Kaur and ors. Vs. Peara Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-1986
Reported in: 29(1986)DLT510
S.B. Wad, J. (1) In an accident which took place on 17.10.1966 on G.T. Road Sardar Peara Singh died due to the severe injuries received by him. The claim petition was dismissed by the Tribunal holding that there was no evidence to show that either the motor cycle No. DLM-2898 on which the deceased was riding or the D.T.C. bus No. DLP-868 was responsible for the accident. (2) On 17.10.1966 the deceased, Sardar Peara Singb, was riding on the motor cycle No. DLM-2898 as a pillion rider, and was going from Sabzimandi to Shakti Nagar side. Near Birla Mill a tonga came from the right side with a high speed and hit the motor cycle. Due to this impact both the Driver of the motor cycle and the deceased fell down. A D.T.C. bus which was coming from behind hit the deceased and ran over him. He was removed to the hospital by the Driver of the motor cycle and the Driver of the bus. Doctor Vishnu Kumar, (Public Witness -2) conducted the postmortem examination and he found the following injuries on ...
Amarjit Singh Vs. Punjab National Bank and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-04-1986
Reported in: [1987]61CompCas153(Delhi); [1987(54)FLR261]; (1986)IILLJ354Del
H.L. Anand, J. 1. This petition article 226 of the Constitution by a former general manager of the U.K. branches of a nationalised bank, concurrently in-charge of its European operations, assails the purported termination of his service by the Bank on the ground of 'loss of confidence' in him, as a sequel to and as part of a shake up in the higher echelons of the Bank in the wake of the largest bankruptcy of an Asian business house in the U. K., and failure of certain other accounts, allegedly exposing the Bank to the risk of loss of millions of pounds, and raises some interesting, as indeed, difficult questions of law, in relation to service in public sector, as indeed, interaction between the principles of industrial jurisprudence and administrative law following recent constitutional developments in the treatment of public sector undertaking as instrumentalities of the State under article 12 of the Constitution. Some of the questions that the petition raises are perhaps not appropri...
Chaman Lal Bakshi Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-04-1986
Reported in: 1986(11)DRJ181; (1986)IILLJ461Del
B.N. Kirpal, J. (1) The challenge in this writ petition is to the imposition of a penalty on the petitioner by the respondent-corporation. The penalty which has been imposed by the impugned order is that of with holding of three increments with cumulative effect.(2) The petitioner was employed as Senior Depot Superintendent with the respondent-corporation. The respondent-corporation is a company registered under the Companies Act but all the shares are held by the Government. It is not disputed by the learned counsel for the respondent that it is a State within the meaning of that expression in Article 12 of the Constitution of India.(3) It appears that while the petitioner was working at Ambala there was a written complaint which was filed against him. The allegation against the petitioner was that he had committed theft, fraud and dishonesty as a result of which there had been a financial loss to the respondent-corporation in respect of 6000 litres of high speed diesel oil. The alleg...
Arjun Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-1986
Reported in: 30(1986)DLT98
Charanjit Talwar, J.(1) The appellant was convicted for offences under Sections 392 and 394 Indian Penal Code Along with two others namely Sita Ram and Sharwan Kumar. He has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 5 years. He has also been directed to pay a fine of Rs. 500.00 . In default of payment of fine he has been directed to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for three months. The co-accused were also imposed the same sentence. (2) By this appeal the appellant is challenging the legality and validity of the judgment of conviction 'as well as of the order of sentence. The appellant and two others, Sita Ram and Sharwan Kumar, were tried for offences under Sections 392/394/397 Indian Penal Code read with Section 34 of the Ipc for having committed robbery and also for having caused injuries to one Chottey Lal. After trial the offence under Section 397 Indian Penal Code has not been held to have been proved against any one of the accused. However, as noticed above, they...
Prem Nath Sarvan Vs. Prem Lata Sarvan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-1986
Reported in: AIR1988Delhi50; 1987(12)DRJ45
Mahinder Narain, J.(1) This is a Revision petition filed by the husband against the order dated 23/2/1985 passed by the court of the Additional District Judge in a petition under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. (2) Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act reads as under :- 'Where in any proceeding under this Act it appears to the court that either the wife or the husband, as the case may be, has no independent income sufficient for her or his support and the necessary expenses of the proceeding, it may, on the application of the wife or the husband, order the respondent to pay to the petitioner the expenses of the proceeding, and monthly during the proceeding such sum as having regard to the petitioner's own income and the income of the respondent it may seem to the court to be reasonable.' (3) What is material under Section 24 is that the party who applies under Section 24 'has. no independent income sufficient for her or his support'. 'It is only when it is established that t...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›