Delhi Court September 1984 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Chandgi Ram Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-04-1984
Reported in: 1985(8)DRJ82
ORDER No. 99 : In accordance with the provisions of Regulation 10 of the D.R.T.A. (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations 1952 as framed by the erstwhile D.R.T.A. which are still in force in terms of Section 516(2)(a) of the D.M.C. Act, the employees of this Undertaking are to retire on attaining the age of 55 years provided their services are not otherwise terminated earlier. The Municipal Corporation of Delhi vide its resolution No. 450 of its meeting held on 5-9-1963 had raised the age of superannuation from 55 years to 58 years in respect of the employees of the Undertaking subject to the following terms and conditions : (a) .............................. (b) .............................. (e) Notwithstanding the conditions stipulated above and the decision to extend the age of superannuation from 55 to 58 years, the appointing authority may require an officer or an employee to the D.T.U. to retire after he attains the age of 55 years after giving three months' notice w...
Collector of Customs Vs. Indian Textile Paper Tube Company
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Sep-03-1984
Reported in: (1985)(19)ELT550TriDel
1. The show cause notice for review of the Order-in-Appeal No. C.3/212/80 dated 2-5-81 passed by the Appellate Collector of Customs, Madras, is the subject-matter of this appeal. The Appellate Collector upheld the contentions of the respondent (The Indian Textile Paper Tube Co. Ltd.) and reversed the orders of the Asstt. Collector of Customs, Madras, dated 12-10-79.2. The respondents imported a consignment of top line tube winder endless belts, valued at Rs, 31,101.00 The supply was by M/s. Scandura Ltd., West Yorkshire, U.K. The consignment was covered under the Bill of Entry No. D-282 dated 6-8-79. The goods were assessed to duty under heading 40.05/16 (3) at 40% + C.V. duty at the rate of .25% under Item 16A (4) C.E.T. The importers lodged the refund claim with the Asstt.Collector on the ground that the belts in question were essential spare parts of the spiral tube winding machine and as such correctly assessable to duty under Heading 59.16/17 of Customs Tariff Act as textile arti...
Pushpa Wati Puri Vs. Official Liquidator
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-03-1984
Reported in: [1984]56CompCas88(Delhi)
M.L. Jain, J.1. We accepted this appeal and st aside the impugned order on September 3, 1981, with the direction that reasons will follow later. There was no order as to costs. Here are our reasons. 2. M/s. Security & Fiance (P) LTd. was under liquidation. The official liquidator filed a claim on March 20, 1972, under s. 446(2)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956, that smt. Pushpa wati puri, wife to the former managing director to the company, had been taking advance from the company from 1957 to 1967 and, according to the accounts, a sum of Rs. 1,01,988.60 was due from her to the company. He prayed for recovery of the above amount together with interest from Mach 31, 1967, to March 23, 1972 the total amount being Rs. 1,62,588.60. The respondent constested the claim application and alleged that the account was fictitious and that the claim was barred by limitation. By an amendment, the official liquidator was allowed to allege that the suit was within limitation because the account wa mutual...
Rajesh Dhawan Vs. Susheel Dhawan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-03-1984
Reported in: 26(1984)DLT469
Goswami, J.(1) This appeal by the husband is directed against the judgment and decree dated 30-4-1981 paused by the learned Addl. District Judge, Delhi whereby the petition under section 13(1)(i)(a) of the Hindu Marriage Act was dismissed. It is stated in the petition that the parties were married on 13-4-1974 at Delhi according to Hindu rites and customs. Two children were born to the parties from the wedlock who are living with the respondent. The first allegation of cruelty is stated in paragraph 4 of the petition and the second one is stated in paragraph 5 of the petition. The first grievance of the appellant is that the respondent was M.A., M.Ed. whereas the appellant was only Higher Secondary and in these circumstances, the respondent used to taunt and nag him for his being less educated. It is alleged that the appellant was residing along with his parents and other family members in the house and Because of these naggings and taunts he had to leave the family house and took a se...
Colour-chem Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Sep-01-1984
Reported in: (1993)(66)ELT327TriDel
1. This is a revision application (hereinafter called "appeal") filed before the Central Government which under Section 35P of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, stands transferred to this Tribunal to be disposed of as if it were an appeal presented before the Tribunal.2. When the matter was called, Shri Dinesh Parekh, advocate, appeared for the appellants. It was put to him by the Bench that prima facie the appeal did not disclose any grievance on the part of the appellants calling for a decision by the Tribunal. It was observed that the course of events in this case as seen from the records was as follows :- 21-3-1977 Price-list in part I proforma (for other than related persons) for their goods (synthetic resins) filed by the appellants. 30-3-1977 Discussion between Shri Rebello of the appellants and the Assistant Collector. 11-4-1977 Letter issued by Assistant Collector holding that transactions between the appellants and three wholesale dealers were not at arm's length and t...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›