Delhi Court March 1982 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
H.S. Gandhi Vs. Abha Arora
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-04-1982
Reported in: AIR1983Delhi288; 21(1982)DLT384; 1982(3)DRJ180; 1982RLR273
B.N. Kirpal, J.(1) The challenge in this revision petition under section 25B(8) is to the eviction order which has been passed against the petitioner tenant on an eviction petition having been filed by the landlady.(2) The landlady filed a petition under Section 14(l)(e) read with section 25B of the Act against the tenant, who is occupying the first floor of premises No.F-18, Geetanjali Enclave New Delhi. The landlady herself is residing on the ground floor of the said house. Summons were issued by the Additional Rent Controller, Delhi, under the Third Schedule, to the tenant. The tenant could not be personally served. The summons were received by his son. Though, as per the record, summons were also directed to be issued by registered Ad, but there is nothing on record to show that such direction was complied with. (3) On the date which was fixed for hearing, namely, 23rd February, 1981 acounsel appeared on behalf of the tenant. I was admitted that affidavit had not been filed seeking...
U.P. State Sugar Corporation Ltd. Vs. the State Trading Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-1982
Reported in: 21(1982)DLT374; 1982RLR459
H.L. Anand, J.(1) By this petition, and connected petitions O.M.P. No. 115 to 118/81, 135, 141 to 146/81 and 159 to 161/81 under Sections 28 of the Arbitration Act, certain sugar mills seek enlargement of time for making the Award by the Sole Arbitration said to have been appointed in the disputes between certain sugar mills and the State Trading Corporation of India Ltd., respondent arising out of the alleged failure of the respondent to lift certain stocks of sugar agreed to be sold to it for export. The petitions have been made in the backdrop of the following facts and circumstances. (2) It appears that by an agreement of March 23, 1977, entered into between the National Federation of Coroperative Sugar Factories Ltd., New Delhi, representing the Co-operative Sugar Factories of India, for short 'the Federation' and the Indian Sugar Mills' Association, New Delhi, representing the privately owned or limited sugar companies, for short 'the Association' on the one hand, and the respond...
Aggarwal Oil and General Mills Vs. Delhi Administration (The State) an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-1982
Reported in: 21(1982)DLT466
J.D. Jain, J.(1) The Petitioner firm is holding alicense as a producer of edible oils granted under Clause 4 of. Delhi Edible Oil (Licensing and Control) Order, 1977 (hereinafter referred to as. the Licensing and Control Order), and, as such, it could sell or store edible oils produced by it in accordance with the provisions of the Licensing and Control Order. On November 26, 1980, staff of the Special Cell, Grime Branch, Delhi Police, Along with the Inspectors of Food and Supplies Department conducted a raid at the business/factory premises of the petitioner situated at C-228, Main Road, Brahmpuri, Delhi, and they found the following quantities of edible oils of different varieties stored therein :- 1.59 tins of 15.9 Kg. each of Sarson Oil Tara Brand. 2. 45 tins of 15.5 Kg. each of Cottonseed Refined Oil-Til Brand. 3. 59 ting of 15.5 Kg. each of Soyabeen Refined Oil-Gopi Brand. 4. 10 tins of 15.9 Kg. each of Til Oil-Swastik Brand.Shri Mool Chand, a partner in the firm, who was present...
Curewell (India) Ltd. Vs. Sahib Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-1982
Reported in: 21(1982)DLT397; 1982(3)DRJ193
Sultan Singh, J.(1) The tenant in this appeal under Section 39 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter refferred to as 'the Act') challanges the judgment and order of the Rent Control Tribunal dated 20th December 1978 passed under Section 14(l)(k) of the Act, directing the appellant to stop us ing the premises for any purposes other than residential or pay to the landlord or deposit in court a sum of Rs. 1,17,761.73 within three months and the landlord then shall get the breanches condoned from the Government. The Tribunal further ordered that in case the misuse was not stopped or the amount was not paid within the time prescribed, the appellant would be evicted.(2) Briefly the facts are that the appellant, Curewell (India) Pvt. Ltd. on 21st November, 1969 took on rent the property at 72, Ring Road, Lajpat Nagar Iii New Delhi on a monthly rent of Rs. 2300.00 exclusive of electricity, water and other charges. The appellant was using the premises for residence- cum-office purpos...
Union of India and ors. Vs. Shyam Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-1982
Reported in: 1982(3)DRJ225b; ILR1982Delhi927
S.S. Chadha, J.(1) These two appeals L.P.As. 172 and 134 of 1981) under Clause X of the Letters Patent are directed against the judgment dated May 29. 1981 of a learned Single Judge of this Court wherein an erroneous frame of the question for answer, namely, 'the question of law for the determination is whether the Chief of the Army Staff, can in law, change the gradiation for promotion made by the Selection Board (on which he presides) under Regulation 107 of the defense Services Regulations, 1962. In other words, the question is whether the Chief of the Army Staff can declare a person unfit for promotion where the Selection Board has declared him fit', has resulted into miscarriage of justice. (2) COL. Shyam Kumar (respondent No. L.P.A. 172(81) was granted Commission by the President of India initially in the Sikh Regiment in the year 1954 and being a volunteer for Parachute Regiment was transferred to that Regiment in the year 1955. In due course, he was selected and promoted in var...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›