Delhi Court January 1982 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Chameli Wati and ors. Vs. Delhi Municipal Corporation and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-1982
Reported in: AIR1982Delhi575; 21(1982)DLT245
Charanjit Talwar, J.(1) This judgment will dispose of F.A.O. No. 115 of 1977 filed by Smt. Chameli Wati and Kewal Ram, parents of Ramesh Chand, deceased, seeking enhancement of the compensation of Rs. 11,500.00 awarded to them by the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Delhi, and the Cross-objections (CM No. 2048 of 1977) filed by the Delhi Municipal Corporation (herein called 'the Corporation') challenging the finding that the accident resulting in the death of Ramesh Chand was due to rash and negli gent driving of the driver Ajit Singh who was driving the bus bearing registration No. Dlp 1 134 on 25th August, 1970, the date of the accident. (2) Admittedly the bus which was being driven by Ajit Singh on 25th August, 1970, at about 7.30 p.m. on Kolhapur Road near Clock Tower, Sabzi Mandi, Delhi, had hit Ramesh Chand. (3) The question for decision before the Tribunal was whether this accident resulting in the death of Ramesh Ghand occurred due to the rash and negligent act of the driver. The...
Harbhajan Singh Vs. Ministry of Defense and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-1982
Reported in: 21(1982)DLT262; 1982(3)DRJ218; (1982)IILLJ387Del
1. The petitioner, who is a Major in the Army, was dismissed for service on 14-1-1975 and was struck off the strength of army on 18th January, 1975. In this writ petition he has challenged the validity of the said dismissal order. 2. Between November, 1968 and November, 1969 the petitioner was commanding 311. Mountain Brigade. A Court of Inquiry was ordered to investigate the allegation of the misuse of the official position by the petitioner. Relying on the report of the Court of Inquiry a show-cause notice was served on the petitioner on 2-1-1974 on the alleged misconduct and the satisfaction of the Chief of Army Staff that court martial was impractical but that his further retention is service was undesirable. The relevant portion of the show-cause notice reads as follows : From the proceedings of the Court of Inquiry convened under the orders of Commander 311 Mountain Brigade, held on 15th May, 73 and subsequent days to inquire into certain allegation against you regarding the purc...
Savitri Devi Vs. Nathu Ram
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-1982
Reported in: 21(1982)DLT360; 1982RLR464
Sultan Singh, J. (1) This revision under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as 'the-Act') challenges the order of the Additional Rent Controller dated 5.3.1981 dismissing the petitioner's application for leave to defend and consequently passing an order of eviction against her under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act. (2) The respondent-landlord filed an application for eviction of the petitioner-tenant under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act on 11.12.1979. Summons in the ordinary manner as well as by registered A.D. post were ordered to be issued. Summons sent to the petitioner through process server upon her on 4.1.1980. Another summons was sent by registered A.D. post under postal receipt No.5304 dated 4.1.1980. The petitioner filed an application for leave to detend on 12.5.1980 and another application under Section 4 of the Limitation Act for condensation of delay in filing the application for leave to defend on 3.12.1980. The petitioner had also filed ...
Sanghi Motors Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-1982
Reported in: (1982)29CTR(Del)182; ILR1982Delhi990; [1982]135ITR359(Delhi)
Ranganathan, J. 1. These are four income-tax references at the instance of the assessed, a firm known as M/s. Sanghi Motors, pertaining to the assessment years 1966-67 to 1969-70. The common question involved in all these references lies within a very narrow compass. The assessed is a firm of eight partners of whom three were partners of the firm in their capacity as the kartas of their respective HUFs. To one of such persons, namely, Suresh Kumar Sanghi, the firm paid salary, interest on deposits and bonus. It is common ground that Suresh Kumar Sanghi was a partner in the firm in his capacity as the karta of his HUF and that the income of the firm which fell to his a share was assessed in the hands of the respective family and not included on his assessment as an individual. Equally it is common ground that the salary and the bonus were paid to Suresh Kumar Sanghi in respect of services rendered by him and were assessable as his individual income. So also the deposits made by him with...
R.P. Kapur and anr. Vs. Kaushalya Educational Trust
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-21-1982
Reported in: 21(1982)DLT46; ILR1982Delhi801
Avadh Behari Rohatgi, J.(1) The founding deed : This is a dispute between father on the one side and mother and sons on the other, The plaintiff Shri R. P. Kapur has instituted asuit under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure against a trust styled Kaushalya. Educational Trust and its trustees, Shrimati Sheila Kapur, his wife and Lov alias Vivek Kapur and Ashok Kapur, his sons. His wife and two sons are the trustees. They are defendants to the suit. The plaintiff, R. P. Kapur, along with one another person has sought directions for the administration of the trust and for framing a scheme. (2) The plaintiffs urge that Kaushalya Educational Trust is a trust of a public character of a Charitable nuture and that the trustees are misappropriating the trust properties. They have alleged various 'misdeeds' of the trustees. As required by the amended Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure leave of the Court is sought to institute the suit. The defendants resist the grant of leave on th...
Gopal Khullar and ors. Vs. the New Delhi Hotels Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-1982
Reported in: 1982(3)DRJ439
D.R. Khanna, J. (1) The plaintiffs as descendants of Late Shri Nagan Nath Khullar, who died on 8-7-1972, have instituted this suit for specific performance of the agreement to sell, and possession of flat No. 12 on the 3rd floor of the multi-storied building constructed by the defendant at No. 27, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi. The same is stated to measure about 510 sq. feet and was agreed to be sold by the defendant to Jagan Nath Khullar on 4-1 1-1970 when the building was in the process of being constructed. The rate agree was Rs. 160.00 per sq. Feet and the total consideration was Rs. 81,600.00 . This amount was payable in various Installments as the building reached different stages of construction. Rs 10.000.00 were paid initially and five other Installments were paid by Shri Khullar from 7-11-1970 to 22-6-1972. Even after the death of Shri Khullar two further Installment of Rs. 8,292.00 each were paid by the plaintiffs in September and November 1972 and receipts obtained. In this w...
Tek Bahadur Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-14-1982
Reported in: 21(1982)DLT233
Charanjit Talwar, J.(1) By this petition Tek Bahadur has challenged his conviction under Section 9 of the Opium Act, 1878, and the sentence of 1' years rigorous imprisonment and imposition of fine of Rs. 500.00 by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi, which have been upheld by the Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, vide judgment dated 26th June, 1981. (2) This petition was admitted on the question of sentence only, as while affirming the sentence the first appellate Court had not considered the question of extending the benefit of the provisions of probation of offenders Act to be the petitioner herein. A report from the Probation Officer regar- ding the antecedents, character, family background, education and present employment as also other particulars of the petitioner was sent for J.D. Jain, J. vide his order passed on 7th August, 1981. The minutes of proceedings of 2nd December, 1981, show that the report of the Probation Officer recommending the benefit of probation...
Vishwanath Khanna Vs. Ram Swarup Rastogi and Sons and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-1982
Reported in: 1982(3)DRJ145
Sultan Singh, J. (1) This is an application under Section 41 read with Schedule Ii of the Arbitration Act 1940 read with Order 40 rule 1 and section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, praying for continuing the appointment/ appointing Shri Y. S. Srivastava Advocate Lucknow as receiver of Shilpi Theatre Lucknow during the pendency of the main petition under Section 20 of the Arbitratio Act with directions to the receiver to continue/take effeclive control of the said theatre and realise the total income of the cinema shows daily and to pay a sum of Rs. 5350.00 per week out of that income tothe respondents and to deposit the remaining amount in an account to be opened in a scheduled bank and to preserve the said amount with him to be available for the satisfaction of the claims of the p etitioner as may ultimately be found under the award which may be made by the arbitrator in the main case.(2) The respondents are owners of a cinema known as Shilpi Theatre situate at Lucknow. On January...
NaraIn Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-12-1982
Reported in: 21(1982)DLT256; 1982(3)DRJ258
J.D. Jain, J.(1) The appellants in both the above mentioned appeals have been convicted of offences under section 307/34, Indian Penal Code as also under section 27 of the Arms Act by an Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi vide judgment dated 12th February, 1981. They have been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for four years each on the first count and rigorous imprisonment for three years on the second count. Feeling aggrieved they have prefarred separate appeals against their conviction and sentence. Since common questions of law and fact are involved, this judgment will dispose of both the connected appeals.(2) The prosecution case succinctly is that on 21st March, 1980, S.I. Mehar Singh, Po ice Post (Railway), Shahdara, was on patrol Along with Head Constable Rajpal Singh and Constable Baru Singh. At about 8.10 A.M. they happened to be at platform No. 2, Railway Station. Shahdara when Janta Expresss came from Howrah side and halted at that platform. A person alighted form the train ...
inspecting Assistant Vs. Orient Abrasives Ltd.
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-11-1982
Reported in: (1982)1ITD996(Delhi)
1. This is an appeal by the revenue pertaining to the assessment year 1976-77 for which the previous year ended on 30-6-1975. The only controversy which has been raised is with regard to the allowance as revenue expenditure of an amount of Rs. 7,69,110 by the learned Commissioner (Appeals).2. The relevant facts are briefly as follows : The assessee is a limited company manufacturing fused aluminium oxide abrasive grains with foreign collaboration of a Czechoslovakian concern. This undertaking of the assessee-company is absolutely a new undertaking.Plant and machinery of the undertaking was under installation until 31-12-1974. There had been trial run of the machinery in June 1974 but actual production commenced a few months later. In fact production of white aluminium grains commenced with effect from 1-1-1975 and that of brown A grains with effect from 1-4-1975. Over and above the actual cost of plant and machinery an expenditure of Rs. 16.49 lakhs had been incurred which was directl...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »