Delhi Court September 1976 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Management of Daily Aljamiat Vs. Gopi Nath Aman and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-03-1976
Reported in: ILR1976Delhi652; 1977LabIC1353
Avadh Behari Rohatgi, J. (1) Here we are concerned with an arbitrator's award made under section 10-A of the Industrial Disputes Act (the Act). The validity of the award is being questioned on the ground that the award gives no reasons and a court is entitled to know the reasons of the arbitrator for arriving at a particular conclusion. (2) These are the facts. Jamiat-e-Ulernai Hind, an organisation of Muslim divines, has an official organ a daily newspaper in Urdu called the Aljamiat. Des Raj Wadhawan respondent No. 2 was working with them in the press as advertisement manager. He joined their service many years ago. The terms and conditions on which Wadhawan was working for them were settled from time to time by agreement between the parties. The last such agreement was executed on May 17, 1965. It came into force from June 1. 1965. (3) The management of the newspaper thought that Wadhawan was guilty of breaches of the agreement. On December 5, 1966, the management asked Wadhawan to ...
R. Dalmia Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-01-1976
Reported in: ILR1976Delhi565b; [1978]113ITR522(Delhi)
T.P.S. Chawla, J. (1) This is an application under section 66(2) of the Income-Tax Act, 1922. The petitioner is R. Dalmia, the assessed. He prays for an order to be made requiring the Appellate Tribunal to state a case and refer to this court certain questions of law said to arise out of its order dated 28th March 1970 made in I.T.A. No. 19601 of 1967-68, and another order dated 13th December, 1971 rectifying paragraph 34 of the former order. Briefly, the matter has arisen as follows.(2) At all material times the assessed was in control of a number of companies, in particular, Jaipur Traders Limited ('J.T) and Bharat Union Agencies (P) Limited ('B.U.A) . In the course of the assessment proceedings for the assessment year 1954-55, relevant to the previous year ended 30th September 1953, the Income-Tax Officer noticed that the assessed had received a sum of Rs. 13,65,000 from B.U.A. in cash on 3rd August 1953, and had paid a sum of Rs. 13,64,250 to J. T. on 7th August 1953, also in cash....
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›