Delhi Court August 1976 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sipso Agencies P. Ltd. (In Liquidation) Vs. Gajraj Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-04-1976
Reported in: [1978]48CompCas30(Delhi)
D.K. Kapur, J.1. This is an application under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 1956, in respect of M/s. Sipso Agencies (P) Ltd., a company in liquidation. This company was ordered to be wound up by the orders passed in C.P. No. 23 of 1973 which was filed by the Registrar of Companies, Delhi. The winding-up order was passed on 6th November, 1974. The applicant gave notices to the 6 respondents claiming that they were directors on the date of the winding-up order according to the records of the Registrar of Companies. It was stated that none of the respondents had applied for extension of time and some of them were not even served and hence it could be inferred that they were avoiding service. The official liquidator sought a direction from the court qua these persons. Two of the respondents had written to the official liquidator on this matter and their replies have been annexed as annexures ' E ' and ' F '. The reply of Gajraj Singh is annexure ' E ', in which he states that he ceased...
Anand Finance (P) Ltd. Vs. Ram Lal Anand
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-1976
Reported in: ILR1977Delhi457
Avadh Behari Rohatgi, J.(1) These are two applications by Anand Finance Private Limited. One is under ss. 391 and 392 of the Companies Act (the Act) (C.A. No. 691 of 1975). The other is under s. 151, Code of Civil Procedure (C.A. No. 692 of 1975). Both the applications were moved in November, 1975. I will deal with them separately. (2) In the application under ss. 391 and 392 of the Act the company has said that in terms of the scheme of arrangement sanctioned by the court of July 29, 1968, respondent Ram Lal Anand was bound to hand over vacant possession of bungalow No. 88, Sundar Nagar, as it belonged to the company. He was also to hand over fixtures and furniture. It is said that Anand handed over vacant possession of the bungalow to the directors of the company at one time. The directors started letting out the building during the period when it was in the possession of the company. But when the present chairman Mr. K. K. Mehra took charge he found that Anand had once more taken il...
Om Parkash Gupta Vs. Ram Nath Gupta and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-1976
Reported in: 12(1976)DLT350; 1976RLR613
V.S. Deshpande, J.(1) This revision is preferred under the proviso to sub-section (8) of section 25B of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 as amended in 1976. The power of this Court is to be exercised within the ambit of the said provision which is as below : 'PROVIDED that the High Court may, for the purpose of satisfying itself that an order made by the Controllerunder this section is according to law, call for the records of the case and pass such order in respect thereto as it thinks fit.'SECTION 25B lays down the procedure for the disposal of applications for eviction of a tenant made by a landlord on either of two grounds, namely : (A)under clause (c) of the proviso to sub-section (1) of section 14 of the Delhi Rent Control Act. 1958, or (b) under section 14A introduced in the Act by the amendment of 1976. THEprincipal part of sub-section ( 1 ) of section 14A would have to he carefully construed in disposing of this revision petition. It is, thereforee. reproduced below: 'RIGHTto ...
Hans Raj Kalra Vs. Kishan Lal Kalra and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-1976
Reported in: ILR1976Delhi745
H.L. Anand (1) This judgment will dispose of certain preliminary issues arising in suits No. 105/70, 429/71 and 35/71, which were consolidated. 3 HCD/76-5 (2) It appears that until his death on June 2, 1946 Ishwar Dass Kalra had been carrying on business in Delhi in the name and style of Ishwar Dass Kaira & Sons and the business consisted of a restaurant known as Esplanade Bar & Restaurant which also had an L4 license. He was survived by three sons, Sudershan Kumar Kaira, Kishan Lal Kaira and Hans Raj Kaira. Since the death of the father there has been considerable expansion of the business which has been carried on in the name and style of Esplanade Bar & Restaurant as indeed in a number of other names and styles, such as, Kishan Lal Wine Merchant, Kishan Lal & Co. Private Ltd. and Kishan Lal Wine Merchants Private Ltd., for part of the period in the status of a joint Hindu family consisting of the three brothers and partly in the form of a partnership of which the three brothers were...
S.N. Rai, Etc. Vs. Union of India, Etc.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-1976
Reported in: ILR1976Delhi667; 1977RLR12
H.L. Anand (1) This order will dispose of claim of privilege in Civil Writ Petitions No. 1457/74, 1311/74, 136/74 and 24/72, which, though made in the setting of different allegations, raise certain common questions as to the true legal position of confidentiality, its extent and the limit of judicial review of such a claim, particularly in the context of the recent decision of the Supreme Court on the question in the case of Raj Narain, Air 1975 Supreme Court 365 (1) and as to the impact, if any, of the decision on the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the earlier case of Sodhi Sukhdev Singh, : [1961]2SCR371 (2). (2) By C. W. P. 1457/74 certain civil servants working in the Posts & Telegraphs Department, who initially belonged to the Central Public Works Department, and had been working in the P & T Dept., on transfer of certain projects, which the Cpwd had until then been handling for the P & T Dept., claim that, having regard to the manner in which and the terms on which their s...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›