Skip to content

Delhi Court March 1975 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Mar 05 1975

P.D. JaIn and anr. Vs. H.S. Sehgal and anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-05-1975

Reported in: 1976CriLJ374

H.L. Anand, J.1. This judgment would dispose of R. S, A, 144/73 Cross-objections and Cr. M. (M) 175/73.2. P. D. Jain and A. P. Jain, Appellants in R. S. A. 144/73 were carrying on business in partnership in the name and style of Bishamber Dass and Sons prior to March, 1958. In March, 1958, a joint stock company by the name of Bishamber Dass and Sons (P) Ltd,, was constituted by them with P. D. Jain as its Managing Director and the other appellant as its Chairman, and the said business was continued. It further appears that the assets of the firm were transferred to the company on its constitution. In May, 1965, the Board of Directors of the company decided to transfer the assets of the company to the said partnership firm. In 1969, the Board decided to wind up the company voluntarily. The decisions were ratified by the company in its general meeting in November, 1969. The winding up proceedings were commenced on January 5, 1970 and were completed on March 18, 1970. The winding up proce...


Mar 04 1975

The Caxton Press Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-04-1975

Reported in: AIR1976Delhi30

1. This is a second appeal against the order of Additional District Judge, Delhi, dated August 26, 1968.2. The appellant brought a suit against the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (respondent) for the recovery of Rs.1,690/- on account of compensation for a time switch which was taken away by the officials of the Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking, a branch of the Corporation, on May 6, 1963. and was converted by them to their own use.2-A. The appellant company carries on the business of printing. They were sanctioned a night load of 30 Kw for use of their Press by the Delhi Administration. The Undertaking insisted upon the installation of a time switch as a condition for supply The appellant purchased it at a cost , Rs.1,690/-, This was fitted at the appellant's premises. The undertaking granted the necessary connection. It was used by the appellant for running the press.3. It appears that later on position of electricity improved. The night load was converted into a regular day load wit...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial