Delhi Court January 1975 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bhupinder Kumar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-1975
Reported in: 1975CriLJ1185; 1975RLR228
M.R.A. Ansari, J.(1) Bhupinder Kumar Bhatnagar, the petitioner herein, and another by name, Parmod Kumar, were committed by the Metropolitan Magistrate. Delhi to take their trial in the Court of Session and a charge has been framed against the petitioner for an office under section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner has filed the present revision petition against the order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge dated 5.6.1974 framing the charge against the petitioner. (2) The order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge framing the charge is being challenged on the ground that the material on record did not make out a prima facie case against the petitioner for an offence under section 376 Indian Penal Code inasmuch as in the statements .made by the proscutrix under Ss. 161 & 164 Cr. P.C. she had not implicated the petitioner by name and the description of the petitioner given by her in such statements did not tally with the description of the petitioner and further that ...
The Commissioner of Income-tax and anr. Vs. the Income-tax Appellate T ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-1975
Reported in: ILR1975Delhi723; [1975]99ITR552(Delhi); 1975RLR330
Prithvi Raj, J.(1) By this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioners have prayed that the order dated 27th January, 1966, passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi, (hereinafter called 'the Tribunal') be quashed and that a direction be issued to it to entertain the petitioners' reference applications; in any event a direction is sought to the Tribunal to entertain and decide petitioners' reference application No. 1722 of 1964-65 arising out of income-tax appeal No. 8113 of 1963-64. Relevant facts necessary for the disposal of the petition are as under.(2) Shri S. V. Deva Income-tax Officer, Special Circle 'A' Ward, Kanpur, by his order dated 25th February, 1955, (Annexure 'A') completed the assessment against the Hindu undivided family of Sahu Tagdish Prasad for the assessment year 1951-52. On Scrutiny of the personal account of the assessed-family it was noticed that there was a cash credit of Rs. 3,65,435.00 representing the sale procee...
S. Amrik Singh Lyallpuri Vs. Ravi Dutt Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-1975
Reported in: ILR1975Delhi685
M.R.A. Ansari, J.(1) Shri Ravi Dutt Sharma, the respondent herein, filed a complaint in the Court of the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Delhi, against the petitioner, Sardar Amrik Singh Lyallpuri, and two others, namely, Shri Ram Singh and Shri Niranjan Das, alleging that they had committed offences under sections 219, 416, 417, 467, 471 and 472 read with sections 34 and 107 IPC. It was stated in the complaint that Niranjan Das had filed a suit against Ravi Dutt Sharma in the Court of the Subordinate Judge, 1st Class, Delhi, claiming possession of the suit property under section 9 of the Specific Relief Act and that although defendant Ravi Dutt Sharma had not been served with the suit notice, Sardar Amrik Singh Lyallpuri had engaged an Advocate, Shri Harbaksh Snigh, representing to the said advocate that he was Ravi Dutt Sharma, the defendant in the suit. A. Vakalatnama purporting to have been signed by Ravi Dutt Sharma was filed by Shri Harbaksh Singh, Advocate, and a written statemen...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›