Delhi Court April 1974 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gobind Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-1974
Reported in: 10(1974)DLT193
P.S. Safeer, J. (1) This judgment will dispose of three criminal Appeals being Nos.23, 65 and 66 off 1973. The ppellantswere convicted by Shri R. C.Aggarwal, Addl. Sessions Judge, Delhi under section 324 and 394 of the Indian Penal Code, (hereafter called 'the,Code') read with Section 34 thereof., Gobind Ram and Ram Lal were sentenced to one and a half years rigorous imprisonment under section 324 read with section 34 of the Code. They were sentenced to three years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 250.00 was imposed on each of them in respect of their convictions under section 394 read with section 34 of the Code. In addition to that for the latter conviction a .fine of Rs,250.00 was imposed in default where of Ram Lal and Gobind were to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for six months. (2) Babu Ram was senterice to two years rigorous imprisonment under section 324 Indian Penal Code and to four years rigorous 'imprisonment ' -under section 394 thereof. -In respect of his coa...
Prem Chand Bhatia Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-1974
Reported in: ILR1974Delhi258; 1975LabIC715
S.N. Shankar, J.(1) The question for decision in this petition is as to the content and scope of clause (1) of Article 310 of the Constitution in the context of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 in relation to civil personnel in defense service in the matter of termination of the services by the President. (2) The petitioner joined service on June 12, 1965 in the Research and Development Organisation, defense Science Laboratory under the Government of India in the Ministry of defense as Junior Scientific Assistant. After completing the probationary period of three years he was declared quasi-permanent. On December 7, 1971, the Administrator of the Union territory of Delhi in exercise of powers under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971 directed that he be detained with a view to preventing him from acting in a manner prejudicial to the defense of India and to the security of the Union Territory of Delhi...
P. N. Sikand Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-1974
Reported in: [1974]96ITR424(Delhi)
KHANNA J. - The question that has been referred to us under section 27 of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 is :'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in taking the view that 50% of the unearned increase payable to the Lesser of the land, formed part of and was not deductible out of the valuation of the property for the purposes of wealth-tax ?'The assessed was assessed to wealth-tax as individual for the assessment year 1968-69. The relevant valuation date is December 31,1967. His total wealth was computed by the Wealth-tax Officer at Rs. 8,10,165. This included, inter alia, a sum of Rs. 6 lakhs, as the value of a house on Plot No. 12, Block No. 39, Kautilya Marg, Chanakya Puri, New Delhi. The assessed had never challenged in the past the determination of the value of this property at Rs. 6 lakhs; but in the relevant assessment year the assessed returned its value at Rs. 4,52,000 on the basis of a certificate from Messrs. Anand Apte Jhabw...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›