Delhi Court April 1974 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Yog Raj Gupta and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-1974
Reported in: 10(1974)DLT244; 1975LabIC959
P.N. Khanna, J.(1) The petitioners herein are Yog Raj Gupta and Bhoj Kanwar Sharma, petitioners Nos. and 3, who are working as selection grade auditors in the grade of Rs. 210-380 with the Chief Pay & Accounts Officer, Ministry of Supply. Another petitioner, H. C. Patiar is petitioner No. 2, who was working as an auditor in the same grade, but was posted on deputation with Director General of Border Security Force. He has since rejoined the Office of the Chief Pay & Accounts Officer with effect from September 12, 1973 on reversion from deputation. The three respondents are, Union of India (respondent No. 1), Comptroller & Auditor General of India (respondent No. 2), and Chief Pay & Accounts Officer, Ministry of Supply (respondent No. 3). Prayer has been made in the petition for a writ .of mandamus directing respondent No. 2, to declare the petitioners successful in the Subordinate Accounts Service Part Ii Examination held in November, 1972, by giving them ten grace marks each and thus ...
Official Liquidator of Vinod Motors Pvt. Ltd. (In Liqn.) Vs. Hindustan ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-1974
Reported in: 11(1975)DLT297
D.K. Kapur, J. (1) M/S Vinod Motors (P) Ltd., is a company which is being wound up by the Court. The winding up petition was filed on 5th February, 1968, and the order for compulsory winding up was passed on 8th November, 1968. The Official Liquidator moved the present application, which is under Section 477 and 548 of the Companies Act, 1956, on 11th July, 1973, which is about four years and 8 months after the winding up order was passed. As respondents, the Official Liquidator has.joined M/s Hindustan Lever Ltd., which is claimed to be indebted to company, in liquidation as well as Sbri Vinod prasad and Shri Radha Kishan, who are the ex-managing Director and one of the Directors of the company. The claim in the application is that the accounts of the company show a debit balance of the Rs. 6, 56.25, against M/s Hindustan Lever, Ltd., as on 8th July, 1966. The Official Liuqidator had sent a notice on 9th June, 1969, to the first respondent which was replied to on 26th June, 1969, the ...
National Finance of India, Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-1974
Reported in: 1974RLR386
B.C. Misra, J. (1) This judgment will dispose of five regular first appeals Nos. 67, 81, 103. 104 and 107, all D of 1965. They have been filed under section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act 1 of 1894 and are directed against the decree of the Additional District Judge, Delhi dated 14th December, 1964 by which he has determined the compensation of the land in dispute at Rs. 6,000.00 per Bigha, besides allowing certain amount of development expenses incurred by the claimants. (2) The land in dispute is situated in village Kharera. The area of the land belonging to National Finance of India Limited (appellant in the first mentioned appeal) is 54 Bighas and the area belonging to the Traders Bank Limited (appellant in R F. As. 103-D, 104. D, and 107-D of 1965) is 72 Bighas and 4. bids was while the area of the land in respect of which compensation is claimed by the New Bank of India (appellant in R.F.A. 81- D of 1965) is only 14 bids was which is purchased from the Traders Bank Limited and fo...
Indian Bank, New Delhi Vs. R.K. Baweja and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-1974
Reported in: 10(1974)DLT240; [1975(30)FLR48]
Rajindar Sachar, J. (1) This is a petition nuder Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash-the Award dated 7th August, 1970 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, respondent No. 1 by which he has directed the reinstatement of the workman respondent No. 2, with full back wages and continuity ' of service. (2) On 1st January, 1968, then- Agent, Mr. Ramamurthy of Delhi Branch of the petitioner bank issued an appointment letter as a peon to respondent No. 2 on the terms mentioned therein. Clause 3 of this letter read as under :- - Clause (3) 'You will be on probation with salary for a period of six months. If during or at the end of the period of probation, your work is found to be not satisfactory, your services maybe terminated on a month's notice or on payment of a month's salary and allowance.' (3) Respondent 2, in pursuance of the above joined the Delhi Branch, Respondent No. 2 not having been confirmed after a period of six months the bank union took up the ma...
Hazarilal Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-19-1974
Reported in: 10(1974)DLT197
P.S. Safeer, J. (1) The appellant was tried by Shri Jagdish Chandra, Special Judge, Delhi who in terms of his judgment dated the 31st of October, 1972 convicted him under section 5(2) of sentenced him to two 'years rigorous imprisonment and to a fine of the Prevention of Corruption Act, hereafter called 'the Act' and Rs. 500.00in default of payment whereof the appellant was to undergo rigorous imprisonment for another period,of three months. The Special Judge convicted the appellant also under section the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to two years rigorous imprisonment The sentences of imprisonment were to run concurrently. It is against that judgment that'the appellant has come up in appeal. (2) The prosecution case was that one Sri Ram had allegedly purchased scooter-rickshaw No. DLR-5813 from L.Gobind Ram and had employed Ram Lubhaya as a driver. It was alleged that there was an incident off the 12th July, 1969 which involved the said vehicle and another. On account of the veh...
Goodwill India Ltd. Vs. U.O.i.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-1974
Reported in: 1974RLR342
V.D. Misra, J.(1) The plaintiff had summoned file No. E/15 from defendant No. 2 Along with other documents. Public Witness . 9, an assistant in the record room of the Dda brought the file in a sealed cover and claimed privilege. Affidavit of Mr. Jagmohan, Vice Chairman of the D.D.A., was filed. The relevant portion is : 'THATI have carefully read and seen the documents placed in the said file and have come to the conclusion that these are unpublished official records relating to affairs of State and their disclosure will cause injury to the public interest for the reasons : (a)-documents are office nothings...reports of officers... opinions... and records pertaining to public policy, (b) That documents in said file are privileged U/S 123 of Evidence Act as these relate to affairs of State...'(2) The plaintiff filed an application (I. A. No. 1189/72) opposing privilege claim and prayed for cross examination of Mr. Jagmohan. This application was opposed by Defendant no. 2 who inter alias...
Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Notam Dass
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-1974
Reported in: 10(1974)DLT290; 1974RLR567
Jagjit Singh, J.(1) On a complaint filed by the Assistant Municipal Prosecutor against. Notam Dass the latter was tried for an offonce under section 7 read with section 16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. The allegations against him were that on April 1966, he was selling in Chowk Kishan.Ganj. opposite, to shop No, 4 150, milk which was indicated to be cow's milk. A sampte of the milk was taken by Vidya Sagar, Food Inspector, and on getting it ana lysed from the Public Analyst it was found to be adulterated. (2) The learned trial Magistrate, however, acquitted the accused on two grounds. It was remarked that there was-no public witness to support the case for the prosecution and secondly that the accused had not admitted the execution of any of the documents, alleged to have been prepared at the time of the taking of the sample. Vidya Sagar had, accompanied by another Food Inspector named S, P. Jain, gone to Chowk Kishan Ganj on April 14, 1966 at about 11 a.m. when Not...
Ravinder NaraIn Vs. Income-tax Officer, New Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-1974
Reported in: 10(1974)DLT356b; [1974]96ITR612(Delhi)
B.C. Misra, J. (1) This Judgment will dispose of two writ petitions (Civil Writ No. 387-D of 1963 and Civil Writ No. 388-D of 1963) the former of which has been filed by Shri Ravinder Narain and the latter by Shri Bishan Narain and Shri Sham Narain. I hey raised common questions of law and fact and are direcied against the same action of the Income-Tax Officer. The material facts are taken from the second writ petition (C W. 388-D of 1963) filed by Shri Bishan Narain and Shri Sham Narain. (2) It appears that there was an agricultural land situated in Mauza Malikpur Chaoni on the Grand Trunk Road Delhi. Nine persons had separate defined shares in them On 22nd July, 1949, they entered into an agreement with Delhi Land and Finance Limited for the purpose of development and parcelling out of the land in plots and sale as a residential colony. Dalhi Land and Finance Limited were appointed as their sole selling agents and a power of attorney was given to them. One of the terms of the agreeme...
Mohammadatique Siudiqui Vs. Anusahmed
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-1974
Reported in: 10(1974)DLT215; 1974RLR422
T.V.R. Tatachari, J.(1) This Second Appeal against Order has been filed by Mohd. Atique Siddiqui against an order, dated October 20, 1972, of Shri G. C. Jain, Rent Control Tribunal, in Rent Control Appeal, R.C.A. No. 316 of 1972, whereby an order, dated March 22, 1972, passed by Shri V. S. Aggarwal, Additional Controller, Delhi, in Suit No. 83 of 1972, directing the appellant herein to deposit arrears of rent at the rate of Rs. 110.00 P.M. was affirmed.(2) The respondent Munshi Anus Ahmed, filed an application under Section 14 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, for eviction of the appellant herein from the suit premises, inter alias on the ground that the appellant had not paid arrears of rent in spite of a demand. It was alleged in the application that the appellant had not paid the arrears of rent from April 1, 1971, at the agreed rate of Rs. 110.00 per month despite service of a notice of demand. In his written statement, the appellant admitted the relationship of landlord and ten...
Roshan Lal Anand and anr. Vs. the Mercantile Bank Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-15-1974
Reported in: [1975]45CompCas519(Delhi); ILR1974Delhi669
S.N. Andley, C.J.(1) The Mercantile Bank Limited, hereinafter referred to as 'the Bank' filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 15,147.71 against the appellants on the basis on an account in respect of two Bills of Exchange for 1b731-10 S each. By his judgment the subodinate judge First Class granted a decree to the Bank in the sum of Rs. 8,405. 61 with proportionate costs. The appellants have appealed and have prayed that the suit should have been dismissed in toto. The Bank has filed cross-objections in respect of the reduction in the amount claimed in the suit.(2) The first appellant is the sole proprietor of and carries on business in the name of Messrs. Hari Chand Anand & Co. the second appellant. On April 25, 1960 the appellants applied to the Bank for the opening of a without-recourse irrevocable confirmed credit to the extent of 1577-0-0d (sterling) in favor of Messrs. D. Narahara & Sons of Tokyo at the Tokyo Branch of the Bank. The object of opening the letter of credit was to enable...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »