Delhi Court January 1973 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
ithad Motor Transport (P) Ltd. Vs. Bir Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-10-1973
Reported in: (1974)IILLJ243Del
ORDERPrithvi Raj, J.1. By this writ petition the petitioner, It had Motors (P) Ltd., (herein to be called the company) has sought a declaration that the order of reference No. C-108/ALC/(4)/ 68-Lab, dated the 19th November, 1968, whereby the dispute about the entitlement of Bihari Lal, (herein to be called the workman) to pay provident fund, bonus and allowances as admissible to the checkers of the company was referred for adjudication to the Additional Industrial Tribunal (herein to be called The Tribunal) is ultra virus of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (herein to be called the Act) and that the award dated the 2nd April, 1971, made by the Tribunal as published in Delhi Gazette, Part VI, dated the 3rd June, 1971, be quashed.2. Brief facts of the case are that the workman was employed by the company and in 1950 he was working as a checker. The company in partnership with M/s. Mool Chand Shripal Jain, owned a petrol pump at Azadpur, Delhi, which was subsequently shifted to G.T. Karn...
Dina Nath Sodhi Vs. Eastern Linkers Private Ltd., New Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-1973
Reported in: 10(1974)DLT151
S. Rangarajan, J.(1) This judgment will dispose of C. A. 608 of 1972 also. D. N. Sodhi was a shreholder and Director of Eastern Linkers Private Limited (which will hereafter be called the 'Company'); the other Director of the Company was S.L. Bali. The Company was imp leaded as respondent No. 1 and S. L. Bedi as respondent No. 2. Smt. Shakuntala Bali wife of S. L. Bali and P. L. Sood and Kartar Singh were imp leaded as respondents 3. 4 & 5, being the other shareholders of the Company. It was alleged by D. N. Sodhi in his petition (C. P. 32/71) under Sections 397 and 398 etc. of the Companies Act that the group of shareholders (respondents 2 to 5) were guilty of certain acts of oppression of D. N. Sodhi. Various reliefs including the investigation of the affairs of the Company, the removal of the present Board of Directors, the appointment of an administrator, the annulment of allotment of certain shares and the restoration of names of certain family members of D. N. Sodhi to the regist...
Sardar Singh Bawa Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-04-1973
Reported in: 9(1973)DLT131
R. Sachar, J.(1) -IS Rule 15 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules 1955 mandatory or not is the question that calls for determination in the reference under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the Additional District and Sessions Judge who by an order dated 9th of June, 1972 has recommended that the charge framed against the petitioner under section 7/16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act 1954 (hereinafter called the Act) be quashed. (2) On 6th August, 1970, Food Inspector Municipal Corporation of Delhi, took a sample of haldi powder from a sealed 'Agmark' packet from one Shri Duli Chand. The sample was sealed in the ttle. Later on the sample which was taken by the Food Inspector was sent to the Public Analyst who declared it to be adulterated. Accordingly, acomplaint was logded by the Food Inspector against the said Duli Chand. It having been disclosed by Duli Chand that the petitioner was a manufacturer of the said 'Agmark' haldi powder, summon was issued ...
Freddy Fernandes Vs. P.L. Mehra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-03-1973
Reported in: ILR1973Delhi682
V.S. Deshpande, J.(1) Under clause (e) of the proviso to sub-section (1)of section 14 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter called the Act) the Controller may, on an application by the landlord, order the eviction of the tenant on the ground that :- (1)The premises are required bona fide by the landlord for the occupation of himself and/or his family, and (2) The landlord has no other reasonably suitable residential accommodation.(2) The decision of this appeal by the tenant under section 39 of the Act depends upon the correct construction of these two provisions and their inter-connection, on the following facts : 'THElandlord respondent is a Grade Iii Central Government servant, his pay being Rs.600.00 per month. He owns two houses, one in Nizamuddin and the other in Jangpura. He occupies the ground floor of the Nizamuddin house. In column 14 of the petition for eviction he stated that the appellant was his tenant occupying the first floor of the Nizamuddin house from 1-3-...
Chetan Samp Vs. Tribeni Devi Etc
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-02-1973
Reported in: 1973RLR133
P.S. Safeer, J.(1) This revision petition has come up in consequence of a recommendation made under section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code (hereinafter called 'the code) by an Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi that the order dated the 6th May, 1972 passed by Mr. K.M. Sawhney, Sub Divisional Magistrate, Punjabi Bagh be set aside. By that order the learned Sub Divisional Magistrate had rejected the objections preferred by the present petitioner.(2) In order to appreciate the circumstances leading to the recommending order, it may be noticed that on account of the reports and counter-reports by the parties to the police, proceedings under section 145 of the Criminal Procedure Cod; were initiated in order to prevent a breach of peace. The dispute related to immovable property consisting of land measuring 61 bighas 8 bids was situated in village Dhichaon Kalan and 14 bighas 1 biswa situated in village Haibetpur. The dispute also related to two houses situated in village Dhichaon Kalan. (...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›