Delhi Court January 1973 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R.C. JaIn Vs. the Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-1973
Reported in: ILR1973Delhi599; [1973]91ITR557(Delhi)
D.K. Kapur, J.(1) In the assessment year 1958-59, Shri R. C. Jain claimed a loss of Rs. 75,000.00 in business transactions relating to disposal pipes. He was otherwise deriving income as a director of some limited companies and was receiving income as director's salary, fees, dividends and interest. The facts set out in the statement of the case submitted by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal under Section 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, show that Shri R. C. Jain (hereinafter referred to as the assessed) was previously a member of a Hindu Undivided Family doing business in pipes under the name of M/S. P. S. Jain Pipe Co. After the disruption of that firm, the assessed entered into a transaction with M/S. Laxmi Iron Stores, Calcutta, which was offering disposal pipes for sale. The assessed entered into the agreement with this firm, in his individual capacity and by a contract in writing dated 12th July, 1957, agreed to purchase 2 lacs feet of disposal pipes of 4 inch type at th...
Khanna Talkies and ors. Vs. Industrial Tribunal, Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-1973
Reported in: [1974(28)FLR169]; ILR1973Delhi859; 1974LabIC831
P.N. Khanna, J. (1) In this writ petition Khanna Talkies, Paharganj, New Delhi, petitioner No. 1, a partnership firm, of which Shambhu Nath and Vishwa Nath, petitioners Nos. 2 and 3 respectively are partners, have challenged the award dated December 28, 1963 of the Industrial Tribunal, Delhi, whereby the orders of dismissal of Bansi Lal, respondent No. 3, and Shiv Kishan Khanna, respondent No. 4, were set aside and it was directed that they will be paid compensation inlieu of reinstatement at the rate of 15 days wages for every years service. The Industrial Tribunal, Delhi, and Delhi Administration have been made respondents Nos. I and 5 respectively, while the Cine Employee's Association (the Trade Union) was imp leaded as respondent No. 2. (2) The petitioners run a cinema called Khanna Talkies in Paharganj, New Delhi. Both respondents Nos. 3 and 4 were their employers. On June 16, 1961, a charge sheet was served on Bansi Lal, respondent 'No.3 and anothr employee alleging that on May ...
R. C. JaIn Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-1973
Reported in: [1973]91ITR559(Delhi)
KAPUR J. - In the assessment year 1958-59, Shri R. C. Jain claimed a loss of Rs. 75,000 in business transactions relation to disposal pipes. He was otherwise deriving income as a director of some limited companies and was receiving income as directors salary, fees, dividends and interest. The facts set out in the statement of the case submitted by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal under section 66 (1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, show that Shri R. C. Jain (hereinafter referred to as 'the assessed') was previously a member of a Hindu undivided family doing business in pipes under the name of M/s. P. S. Jain Pipe Co. After the disruption of that firm, the assesse entered into a transaction with M/s. Laxmi Iron Stores, Calcutta, which was offering disposal pipes for sale. The assessed entered into the agreement with this firm, in his individual capacity and by a contract in writing dated 12th July, 1957, agreed to purchase 2 lakhs feet of disposal pipes of 4 inch type at the rate o...
Riaz Ahmad and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-1973
Reported in: AIR1974Delhi151
1. This revision petition has been filed by the Plaintiff petitioners against the order of a Subordinate Judges 1st Class. Delhi, dated 21st March, 1968 by which he has answered the first issue against the plaintiffs and-held that the Civil Court had no jurisdiction to try the suit and. has dismissed their suit with costs.2. The facts Living rise to the revision are that the property in dispute was declared to be evacuee property and had been sold on 19th December, 1964 by the Managing officer in eateries of powers conferred by the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act 44 of 1954 after the property had been acquired by the Central Government under Section 12 of the said Act. The Plaintiffs have brought the suit on the following material allegations, namely (1) plaintiff s Nos. 1 and 2 are son and daughter of Mohd- Ahmad and Plaintiff No. 3 is the husband of Plaintiff No. 2 and that they have been living in the property in dispute (2) the said property. it is alleged b...
P.R. Nayak Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-1973
Reported in: ILR1973Delhi747
S.N. Andley, J. (1) The constitution and continuance of the one-man Commission presided over by Justice J. N. Takru, hereinafter referred to as 'the Commission', has been challenged by the petitioner P. R. Nayak on various grounds. Respondent No. 1 to this petition is the Union of India through the Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Petroleum and Chemicals and respondent No. 2 is Justice J. N. Takru himself. The petitioner, a Government servant, was, at the relevant time, the Managing Director of the Indian Refineries Limited, a public sector undertaking, now merged with the Indian Oil Corporation, another public sector undertaking. (2) Shortly stated, the Commission was appointed to inquire into alleged irregularities in the grant of contracts and in the actual construction of the Gauhati-Siliguri and Haldia-Barauni-Kanpur Pipelines and in the payments made to two contractors, namely, (1) Bechtels as Design Engineers and over-all Supervisors in Gauhati-Siliguri Pipeline...
Dhani Ram Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-1973
Reported in: 9(1973)DLT255; 1973RLR141
P.S. Safeer, J.(1) Although no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner yet I am to deal with the report submitted by Shri S. C. Chaturvedi, Addl. Sessions Judge, Delhi under section 488 of the Criminal Procedure Code, hereafter called 'the Code' (2) The report recommends that the order dated the 11th September, 1972 passed by Shri C. D. Sharma, Sub Divisional Magistrate, Delhi under section 107 read with section 112 of the Code be set aside to the extent to which it contains the direction that the petitioner Dhani Ram may furnish bail bond for his continuous appearance in Court on the dates on which the procedings may be taken up. (3) According to the allegations against Dhani Ram, be Along with one Paras Ram was engaged in selling cinema tickets at black-market rates when Fateh Singh, complainant contacted them. Dhani Ram and his companion were alleged to have offered to sell a ticket of the value of Rs. 1,65 to Fateh Singh for Rs. 4.00. Fateh Singh is alleged to have offered Rs....
Raj Rani Vs. Kartar Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-16-1973
Reported in: 1975RLR264
V.S. Deshpande, J.(1) The decision of this appeal turns on the question whether the plaintiff- respondent was ready and willing to purchase the property from defendant-appellants from the date of the contract between the parties till the date of the filing of the suit for specific performance by the plaintiff-respondent against the defendants. (2) The suit for specific performance filed by the plaintiff-respondent against the defendants appellants has been decreed by the trial Court. Hence this appeal by the defendants appellants. The facts and circumstances on which the decision in the appeal would be arrived at may be shortly stated. (3) The ground floor portion of the building in suit was leased by the defendants-appellants to the plaintiff-respondent in 1958. On 21-9-1961, the defendants-appellants agreed to sell the building in suit to the plaintiff-respondent. The conveyance of the property, however, did not take place and a fresh agreement to sell was executed by the defendants-...
Dharam Vir Etc. Vs. Lalita Prasad Etc.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-12-1973
Reported in: 1973RLR144
P.S. Safeer, J.(1) This petition is in consequence of the report dated the 18th September, 1972 submitted by Mr. D.C. Aggarwal, Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi under section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code, hereafter called 'the Code'. The learned Add1. Sessions Judge was moved by the petitioners through a petition preferred under section 435 of the Code and the grievance raised was that the orders passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Darya Ganj, Delhi which purported to be under sections 107/112 of the Code against them were illegal and deserved to be quashed. (2) Lalita Prashad resident of house No. 3584, Gali Hakim Wali, Darya Ganj, Delhi submitted an application under section 107 of the Code against the petitioners under the date 28.1.1972 in which he alleged that on the 5th September, 1971 armed with knives and daggee is having made preparations to kill him the petitioners had made a show of force causing apprehension of danger to his life. Lalita Prashad made good his esc...
Begum Jan Vs. Mehr Nigar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-12-1973
Reported in: 9(1973)DLT516; 1973RLR589
R.N. Aggarwal, J. (1) MST. Mehr Nigar is a tenant in premises bearing No. 1037, Gali Anarwali, Kishen Ganj, Delhi, under the petitioner Mst. Begum Jan. The rent of the premises is Rs. 15.00per month. On 10th September 1966, the landlady served a notice of demand on the tenant, under Section 14(l)(a) of the Delhi Rent Control Act hereinafter referred to as the ('Act'), for the arrears of renter the period 1st July, 1964 onwards The tenant deposited the arrears of rent on 26th September, 1967 for the period 1st August, 1965 to 30th September, 1967. The rent for the period prior to 1st August, 1965 had also been deposited by the tenant. T.he above mentioned fads arc net in dispute(2) On 5it Decmber. 1967, the landlady filed an application under Section 14 of the Act for eviction of the tenant on the grounds of (a) non payment of rent, (b) misuse of the premises, and (e) sub-letting. On 3ih February, 1968, Shri S. R. Goel, Addl. Rent Controller, passed an order under section 14(1) of the A...
K. Subba Rao Vs. the National Co-operative Consumers Federation Ltd. a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-10-1973
Reported in: AIR1974Delhi132
S.N. Andley, C.J.1. This judgment will dispose of two appeals (L. P. A No. 63 of 1970 and L. P. A. No. 110 of 1970), both being against the judgment dated March 5, 1970 of a learned Single judge of this Court in Civil Writ No. 519 of 1969. The appellant in the first appeal is K. Subba Rao and the appellant in the second appeal is the Delhi Administration. The writ had been filed by the National Co-operative Consumers Federation Limited, New Delhi, hereinafter referred to as 'the Society'. The Society is registered as such under the Bombay Co-operative Societies Act, 1925 as extended to Delhi. The respondents to the writ petition were the Delhi Administration (respondent No. 1); the Registrar, Co-operative Societies ' Delhi (respondent No. 2); Jyoti Prasad Jain, Amba Prasad and Dr. T. Karnesbwara Rao (respondents Nos. 3, 4 and 5 respectively) and the aforesaid K.Subba Rao (respondent No. 6). K. Subba Rao was appointed by the Society as its Accounts Officer on May 15, 1967 on a salary of...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »