Delhi Court September 1972 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ratan Chand Vs. the Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-04-1972
Reported in: AIR1974Delhi26
1. This order will dispose of C. Ws. 127/67 and 331-D/66. The points involved in both the petitions; are the same and they have been argued together. For purposes of this order facts in C. W. 127/67 are being referred to.2. The petitioner in C. W. 127/67 is an occupant of 93 square Yards of land situated at Motia Khan since prior to 1950. This land is Government land. The petitioner paid damages for his occupation of this land at the rate of Rs.5/- per month per hundred square yards. On August 7, 1965 the Petitioner received a notice from the Estate Officer under sub-section (2) of Section 7 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1958, hereafter called 'the Act' demanding a sum of Rs, 837.12 in respect of his occupation of this land for the period with effect from April 1, 1963 to March 31. 1965 at the rate of Rs.37.50 Per hundred square Yards i.e. Rs. 34.88 for 93 square yards. The petitioner was required to show cause on or before September 23, 1965 why an o...
Devi Dayal and ors. Vs. Bhupinder Kumar and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-04-1972
Reported in: AIR1973Delhi290
ORDER1. This suit was file by Devi Dayal (who has since been substituted by his legal representatives) for the recovery of Rs.2,50,000/- . It was alleged in the suit that one Ch. Ram, Narain Bishnoi took from the plaintiff loaned totaling Rupees the plaintiff on the said dates. It was also stated in para 4 of the plaint that about a year back Ch. Ram Narain died and the defendants are his sons and legal representatives of his estate and are bound to pay the just debts of their father. A decree fro Rupees 2,50,000/- comprising of Rs. 1,43,000/- as principal and Rs. 1,07,000/- as interest was thereforee prayed. Suit was filed on 18-1-1965. In the suit when the evidence was being taken on commission on 6-2-1971 the advocate for the defendants made a statement that Banwari Lal, defendant made a statement that Banwari Lal, defendants NO.2 had died by failure of heart on 31-1-1971. On this the advocate for the plaintiff stated that the case could be proceed in the absence of the deceased def...
Shahabia Begum Vs. Pukhraj Begum and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-04-1972
Reported in: AIR1973Delhi154
1. This judgment will dispose of two execution section Appeals Esa 9 of 1972. filed by Shahabia Begum and Esa 10 of 1972, filed by Sharfuddin. The appeal are directed against two separated judgment both date April 12, 1972 of the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi, dismissing their first appeal against the orders of the execution court dismissing their respective objections to the sale of certain property in favor of Pukharj Begum and to the delivery of its possession to her.2. Shahabia Begum, appellant in Esa 9 of 1972, herein called the appeal is the widow of Wahabuddin who died on June 26, 1961, leaving behind him, the appellant his son, Sharfuddin, respondent No. 6 in Esa 9 of 1972, Pukhraj Begum, widow of his pre-deceased son who is respondent No.1 in both the appeals and her children respondents Nos. 2 to 5 in both the appeals. On June 25, 1968, Pukhraj Begum and her children respondent Nos. 1 to 5, and Shahabia Begum the appellant as plaintiff Nos. 1 to 6, files a suit for...
Surinder Kumar Etc. Vs. Bhupinder Singh Etc.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-04-1972
Reported in: ILR1973Delhi715
Rajindar Sachar, J. (1) This suit was filed by Devi Dayal (who has since been substituted by his legal representatives) for the recovery of Rs.2,50,000.00. It was alleged in the suit that one Ch. Ram Narain Bishnoi took from the plaintiff deferent totalling Rs. 1,43,033-/and executed pronotes in favor of the plaintiff on the said dates. It was also stated in para 4 ofthe plaint that about a year back Ch. RamNarain died and the defendants are his sons and legal reprasentatives of his estate and are bound to pay the just debts of their father. decree for Rs. 2,59,033.00 comprising of Rs. 1,43,033.00 as principal and Rs. 1,07,000.00 as interest was thereforee prayed. Suit was filed on18-1-1965. In the suit when the evidence was being taken on commission on 6-2-1971 the advocate for the defendants midst a statement that Banwari Lal, defendant No. 2 had died by failure of heart on 31-1-71.On this the advocate for the plaintiff stated that the case could not proceed in the absence of the deb...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›