Delhi Court August 1971 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Onkar and Nath Vs. Rameshwar Dass and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-05-1971
Reported in: AIR1972Delhi80; ILR1972Delhi380
V.S. Deshpande, J. (1) Section 7(iv)(c) of the Court Fees Act as amended by the Court Fees (Punjab Amendment) Act, 1953 as extended to Delhi runs as follows :- '7.The amount of fee payable under this Act in the suits next hereinafter mentioned shall be computed as follows :- ** ** ** (iv) In Suits- ** ** ** (c) to obtain a declaratory decree or order, where consequentialrelief is prayed, ** ** ** according to the amount at which the relief sought is valued in the plaint or memorandum of appeal : In all such suits the plaintiff shall state the amount at which he values the relief sought : Provided that the minimum court-fee in each case shall be thirteen rupees. Provided further that in suits coming under sub-clause (c) in cases where the relief sought is with reference to any property such valuation shall not be less than the value of the property calculated in the manner provided for by clause (v) of this section.'(2) It is common ground between the parties that in a former suit joint...
Remington Rand of India Ltd. Vs. Delhi Administration and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-05-1971
Reported in: ILR1971Delhi723
S. Rangarajan, J. (1) The petitioner. Messrs Remington Rand of India Limited, is aggrieved by the order passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Delhi (Shri R. K. Baweja) over-ruling certain preliminary objections to the industrial dispute adjudicating a reference made by then Lieutenant Governor, Delhi, by his order dated 28th March 1970 and the further corrigendum issued on , June 1970. (2) Messrs Remington Rand of India Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Company) has its registered office and head office at Calcutta; it has also a Regional office at Delhi at which the main business is the sale and service of typewriters and office equipment. There are three branches of the company at Chandigarh, Jaipur and Amritsar and two depots at Jammu and Simla. The branches and depots are under the over-all administrative control of the regional office, the day-to-day administration being looked after by the branch managers. The regional office is no doubt under the control of the head office at...
Prem Kumar and anr. Vs. Dharam Pal Sehgal and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-1971
Reported in: AIR1972Delhi90
ORDER1. This revision petition has been filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure by the defendants against an order of the Subordinate Judge 1st Class. Delhi, dated 17th December 1970 by which he had decided three preliminary issues.2. The brief facts leading to the revision are that the plaintiffs, who are the sons of defendant No. 1 instituted a suit for a declaration (with consequential relief) that the properties in dispute constituted joint Hindu family properties and for delivery of possession of the properties which had been alienated and for an injunction restraining the defendants from alienating the remaining properties. The properties in dispute are mostly situated in District Hissar. State of Haryana, but one property mentioned at Seriall No. (V) is said to be a coparcenary house situated in Kuanwali, Delhi which is said to be in possession of Premkumar, defendant No. 9, who is alleged to be one of the sons of defendant No. 1 by a lady defendant No. 8. about w...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›