Delhi Court August 1970 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Lila Sardana and anr. Vs. Premjus Roy
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-05-1970
Reported in: ILR1970Delhi514
Jagjit Singh, J. (1) This second appeal arises out of a suit which was instituted, on April 20, 1966 by Shri Premjus Roy against Shrimati Lila Sardana and Surinder Kumar. The suit was for possession of a flat on the second floor of building No. 6/3, Original Road (DeshBandhu Gupta Road), Paharganj, New Delhi, and for recovering Rs. 940 as dam ages.(2) On February 28, 1967 Shri R. L. Gupta, Subordinate Judge First Class, Delhi, decreed the suit for possession of the flat in dispute and allowed damages to the extent of Rs. 675.00 on account of use and occupation of the flat from the 3rd July 1965 to 3rd April 1966 at the uniform rate of Rs. 75.00 per month. The defendants filed an appeal against the decree of the Subordinate Judge which was dismissed by Shri J. D. Jain, Additional District Judge, Delhi. Thereafter the present second appeal was preferred in this Court. (3) According to the averments contained in the plaint the flat in dispute was given on lease for a period of three month...
Chander Bhan Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-04-1970
Reported in: 1971CriLJ167
ORDERR.A. Ansari, J.1. One Jit Singh is being prosecuted in two cases, one under the Punjab Excise Act, 1914, and the other Under Sections 279/ 337, Penal Code. The prosecution case against him is that he was driving car No. DLK 4200 on 21-5-1970 when the police tried to intercept him as they suspected that he was smuggling liquor. In order to escape from being apprehended, Jit Singh is said to have driven the car in a rash and negligent manner thereby causing hurt to a pedestrian. He was ulti. mately apprehended and 96 bottles of liquor were recovered from the car. Tie car waa also seized and produced before the Court. Shri Chander Bhan, the petitioner, who is said to be the owner of the car filed two applications before the Court for the release of the car and for the custody of the car pending disposal of the two cases. One of these applications was dismissed summarily on 27-6-1970. The other application was dismissed on 2-6-1970 and the grounda stated by the learned Magistral in th...
Kailash Chand Gupta Vs. Chief Commissioner, Delhi Administration
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-1970
Reported in: ILR1970Delhi253
Rangarajan, J. (1) The petitioner, who was working as a Junior Clerk in the office of the Director of Industries, Delhi Administration, in the wing of the Community Project Officer, was promoted as a Senior Clerk with effect from the forenoon of 26th July. 1967 on an ad-hoc basis and was posted in the office of the Controller, Weights and Measures, Chandi Chowk by an order dated 28th July, 1962 (copy of which is annexure R-1 to the return filed by the Delhi Admi- nistration). It was specifically stated in that letter that the said appointment as Senior Clerk would not confer on the petitioner any claim to the regular appointment and seniority.(2) During the period he was working as a Senior Clerk certain charges were leveled against the petitioner by means of a memo, dated 23rd May, 1963 (copy of which is annexure A to the writ petition) by the Director of Industries, Delhi. The petitioner submitted on 31-5-1963 an Explanationn to the memo. After the receipt of the said Explanationn th...
J.L. Mehta Vs. Hira Devi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-1970
Reported in: 6(1970)DLT484; 1971RLR70
Rajinder Sashar, J. (1) This is an appeal under Section 39 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, (hereinafter to be called as the Act) against the Judgment of the Rent Control Tribunal dated 28th May, 1970, by which he affirmed the Judgment of the Additional Rent Controller directing the eviction of the appellant from the premises in dispute. (2) The respondent landlady filed an application for eviction of the appellant from the premises on the ground floor of house No. A6/10, Rana Partap Bagh, Delhi, on the ground that she required the premises bonafide for herself and for the residence of herself and the members of her family dependant upon her. The appellant contested the applica and pleading that there was no relationship between landlord and tenant between the parties. He further disputed that the respondent-landlady bona finde required the premises fos herself and for the members of her family. The learned Additional Rent Controller by his judgment dated 18th October, 1968 found t...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›