Skip to content

Delhi Court July 1969 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jul 08 1969

Amba Dutt and ors. Vs. Hira

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-08-1969

Reported in: 6(1970)DLT36

H.R. Khanna, J. (1) This second appeal under Section 104 of the Himachal Pradesh Abolition of Big Landed Estates and Land Reforms Act, 1954 (Act No. 15 of 1954), hereinafter referred to as the Act, by Amba Datt and his two brothers is directed against the order of learned District Judge, Mahasu, Sirmur, Bilaspur and Kinnaur Districts, modifying on appeal the order of Compensation Officer, Sirmur. As a result of the appeal, proprietary rights in the land in dispute except the non-fruit trees have been vested in Hira respondent on payment of Rs. 503.25 Paise as compensation for the land, Rs. 406.00 as compensation for the cow-sheds and Rs. 302.00 as compensation for the fruit trees. (2) The brief facts of the case are that Hira, who was occupying the land in dispute measuring 21 Bighas 18 bids was as tenant under Amba Datt and his two brothers, filed an application under section 11 of the Act for acquisition of the proprietary rights in that land. (3) The application was resisted by Amba...


Jul 03 1969

Dhaki Ram Vs. State

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-03-1969

Reported in: 5(1969)DLT612

I.D. Dua, C.J.(1) On 3rd July, 1969, we recorded a short order releasing Dhani Ram whom we found to be illegally kept in District/Special Jail at Dharamsala pursuant to an order made by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Palampur. on 20th June, 1939. We now proceed to record the. detailed order giving reasons for our decision. (2) This is the second instance in this Court when on inspection of a Sub-Jail in Himachal Pradesh, citizens have been found to be kept in custody along with convicts and other inmates of the prison on the ground that they are considered to be lunatics. In Golo v. Union of India. a Bench of this Court dealt with cases of foui citizens who were detailed in custody in Solan Sub-Jail as lunatics. As a result of the inspection of the Sub-Jail on 14th June, 1967, it was discovered that Order directing their detention were nto in accordance with law. After going into the legality of their detention in hubas corpus proceedings they were all directed to be released because t...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial