Delhi Court November 1969 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Suresh Chandra Sharma Vs. Delhi Library Board
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-07-1969
Reported in: ILR1970Delhi333
T.V.R. Tatachari, J.(1) This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner, Suresh Chandra Sharma, praying (1) for the issuance of a writ of certiorari quashing (i) certain inquiry proceedings conducted against him, (ii) the findings and the report of the inquiry Officer dated Mar. 6, 1968, and (iii) an order dated June 7, 1968, retiring the petitioner compulsorily from service under respondent No. 1, (2) for the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in the post of Head of the Department/Branch Librarian with all the benifits, and (3) for the issuance of such other order or direction as may be considered just and necessary in the 'circumstances of the case. Respondent No. I is the Delhi Library Board, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, No.XXI of 1860. Respondent No.2 is the Secretary, Ministry of Education, Government of India, New Delhi. In opposition to the writ petition, two counter affidavits ]have been filed, ...
Digambar Prasad Vs. S.L. Dhani Etc.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-1969
Reported in: ILR1969Delhi1016
H.R. Khanna, J.(1) This writ petition has been referred to Full Bench in pursuance of the order of Dua, C.J. (as he then was) and Rangarajan. J. in the following circumstances. (2) Digambar Prasad, proprietor of Musaddi Mal Brothers, is occupying the shop in dispute bearing Municipal No. 1791. situate in Dariba Kalan, Delhi, as a tenant of Shrimati Devi Jain and Shrimati Gun Wanti Devi Jain respondents 2 and 3. The petitioner is carrying on jeweller's business in the shop. On October 28, 1964 respondents 2 and 3 filed a petition under the Delhi Rent Control Act for the eviction of the petitioner from the shop on the ground that for the period till September 30. 1964, Rs. 1,180 were due from the petitioner on account of arrears of rent at the rate of Rs. 46.00 per mensem and that he had refused to pay the said amount in spite of a registered notice. The petitioner was also alleged to have sublet a portion of the shop without the consent of respondents 2 and 3. (3) The application of the...
Sita Ram Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-04-1969
Reported in: ILR1969Delhi1024
S. Rangarajan, J.(1) The appellant Sita Ram, said to be munshi of an advocate and aged about 24 years, has preferred this appeal against his conviction under section 302 Indian Penal Code, he having been awarded the lesser sentence of rigorous imprisonment for life. Three other persons Lal Chand (said to be aged 19 years), a scooter rickshaw driver Hari Krishan and another Harbhajan Singh (both of them said to be 21 years) who were charged under section 302 read with section 34 Indian Penal Code in connection with the alleged murder of Jawahar Lal (said to be aged 19 or 20 years), were acquitted by the learned Sessions Judge, Delhi, who tried the case. (2) The prosecution case, briefly stated, is that the deceased Jawahar Lal had a love affair with a girl, named Sheela, daughter of Chuni Lal, who lived in Lajpat Nagar, New Delhi. The deceased and his brother Raj Kumar (Public Witness I) worked along with their father Dina Nath (Public Witness 26) who runs the Gupta Restaurant at Wazir ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›