Delhi Court January 1969 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R.S. Nawal Kishore Vs. the Union of India Through General Manager, Nor ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-1969
Reported in: ILR1969Delhi410
P.N. Khanna, J.(1) The only question involved in this appeal is whether the appellant, who is the pawnor of certain shares in favor of respondent No. 5-Bank, is entitled to the dividends and the right, and bonus shares issued, in respect of the said pledged shares.(2) The facts giving rise to this appeal are as follows : 101 shares of the Punjab National Bank Limited of the value of Rs. 100.00 per share originally stood in the joint names of respondent No. 2 and his brothers respondents Nos. 3 and 4. Respondent No. 2 D entered into a partnership with the appellant under the name of New Shares Corporation.(3) This firm. New Shares Corporation, had an overdraft account with the Hindustan Commercial Bank Ltd., respondent No. 5. As a security in the said account, 91 shares out of the said 101 shares of the Punjab National Bank Ltd. were pledged by the said firm with respondent No. 5, who, in a suit for the recovery of money due, obtained a decree for the amount found due to it. It was, how...
Seth Munna Lal Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-1969
Reported in: 6(1970)DLT47
S.K. Kapur, J. (1) On July 17, 1968, the Collector of Delhi, acting as Competent Authority under the Requisitioning are Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952, issued anotice in exercise of the powers conferred on him by sub-section (1) of section 3 calling upon Munna Lal petitioner to show cause as to why the property, 26, Ferozshah Road, New Delhi, be nto requisitioned. In the notice it is inter aha stated that the property described in the Schedule hereto annexed is needed for a public purpose, viz. accommodating Government Officers/Offices being a 'purpose of the Union,.....'. Section 3 of the said Act requires that where the competent authority is of opinion that. any property is needed or likely to be needed for any public purpose, being a purpose of the Union, and that the property should be requisitioneel, the competent authority shall call upon the owner or any other person who may be in possession of the property by notice in writing (specifying therein the purpose of th...
Sardar Jasbir Singh Vs. Malik MukhbaIn Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-1969
Reported in: 5(1969)DLT418
S.K. Kapur, J.(1) This is a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution directed against an order of the 1t Additional Rent Controller, Delhi, dated 5th March, 1968, requiring the petitioner's counsel to withdraw from the ejectment proceedings pending against the petitioner. The view that I am taking of the matter renders it unnecessary to state the facts very elaborately. (2) Malik Mukhbain Singh, respondent herein, (hereinafter referred to as 'the landlord'), filed a petition for ejectment against the petitioner, which is pending in the Court of the 1st Additional Rent Controller, Delhi. The petitioner was, and is being, represented by Sardar Janak Singh, Advocate. The Advocate, when called upon to admit or deny certain documents, admitted some but denied the rest. The landlord then made an application that the Advocate be examined as a witness. It is the claim of the landlord that before doing so he even issued interrogatories to the petitioner to admit or deny those documents bu...
The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, New Delhi Vs. Bharat Ram Charat Ram an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-03-1969
Reported in: ILR1969Delhi738
S.K. Kapur, J. (1) At the instance of the commissioner of Wealth-tax the following question of law has been referred to this Court under section 27(1) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 :- 'WHETHERon the facts and circumstances of the case. the value of the interest of the assessed company as a partner in the firm of M/s. Allied Distributors and Co., is includible in its net wealth' ?(2) The assessed is a private limited company. It has been a partner in a partnership firm M/s. Allied Distributors and Co. with effect from 16th August, 1955. In the return filed by the assessed for the assessment year 1957-58 (the relevant valuation date being 31-12-1956), the assessed showed a sum of Rs. 2,95,337.00 as the value of its share of wealth in the aforesaid firm. The Wealth Tax Officer calculated the value at Rs. 4,47,490.00. The assessed appealed to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner who by his order dated 28th March, 1961, reduced the value of the wealth by Rs. 87.190.00. The assessed as well as...
Mohd. Shaffi Vs. Amtul Nisa Begum
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-03-1969
Reported in: 5(1969)DLT503
Om Parkash, J. (1) This petition, under section 561A, Criminal Procedure Code, is directed against an order of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate dated the 30th November, 1966.(2) The respondent had, on the 1st March 1966, filed an application, under section 488, Criminal Procedure Code, against the petitioner. The allegations, in the application, were that the respondent was married with the petitioner on the 9th September, 1962, according to Muslim rites, that the petitioner and the respondent had lived as husband and wife for the period of eight months, that the petitioner had subjected the respondent to cruel treatment and had ultimately turned her out of the house after giving beating. It was, further, alleged that the petitioner, who had sufficient means, had neglected to maintain the respondent. The respondent prayed that the petitioner may be ordered to pay Rs. 130.00 per mensem as maintenance allowance to the respondent.(3) After recording preliminary evidence, the Sub-Divisional M...
Saroj Kumari Vs. Lalit Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-02-1969
Reported in: 5(1969)DLT268
I.D. Dua, C.J.(1) This is a landlady's second appeal under section 39 of the Delhi Rent Control Act No. 59 of 1958 assailing the order of the Rent Control Tribunal dated 27th March, 1968 whereby the order of the learned Additional Rent Controller dated 30th August, 1967 ordering ejectment of the tenant from the house in dispute was reversed and the tenant's appeal allowed with costs.(2) The ejectment proceedings were initiated by the landlady on the ground of personal bona fide requirement. The house, as is clear from the order of the learned Additional Rent Controller, comprises two rooms, a kitchen, a balcony, a common bath room and a. latrine It was rented out to the tenant on 11th May, 1963. The landlady who is stated to have been deserted by her husband had no other residential house for her and she averred that she required these premises for her own bona fide occupation.(3) This application was resisted by the tenant on the ground that the same had been filed merely because the ...
Nahan Foundary Limited Nahan Vs. Ram Kishan Kulwant Rai
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-01-1969
Reported in: 5(1969)DLT545
Hardayal Hardy, J.(1) This civil revision is directedagainst the order passed by the Senior Subordinate Judge, SirmurDistrict, Nahan, on 3l-12-1969 dismissing the petitioner's applicationfor amendment of its Written-statement. The petitioner is NahanFoundry Limited Nahan which is Government undertaking while therespondents are M/s Ram Kishan Kulwant Rai, a partnership firmdoing bosiness in Punjab Delhi and other places. The plaintiffs hadfiled on 25-9-1967 a suit against the defendant-petitioner for renditionof accounts on the allegations that they had acted as distributors forthe sale of electric motors and pumps manufactured by the defendantpetitioner as per terms and conditions contained in an agreement dated.20-3-1962 for the States of Uttar Pradesh and Punjab including Delhi.and that the agreement was initially for a period of one year but hadbeen extended by mutual agreement until it stood expired on 19-3-1965.(2) The defendant in its written statement admitted the allegations th...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›