Delhi Court May 1968 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mam Chajnd Vs. Sumat Prasad
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-07-1968
Reported in: 5(1969)DLT51
Hardayal Hardy, J.(1) This second appeal is directed against an order made by the Rent Control Tribunal, Delhi whereby the tenunl's appeal against the order of the Addl. Rent Controller, Delhi was dismissed.(2) The facts leading to the appeal are that the respondent-landlord obtained an order for eviction of the tenant-appellant from certain premises on 23/2/1962. The property being situated in colum area the respondent applied to the Competent Authority appointed under the Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1956 for permission to execute the order for possession. This application was granted by the Competent Authority on 15/10/1963. The relevant portion of the order reads as under:- 'Iam inclined to pass a conditional order that the respondent shall pay the entire arrears amounting to Rs. 1883.72 by 29/2/1964. In case of default the respondent shall be liable to eviction. No formal permission will be required. Permission as contemplated under section 19 of the Slum Areas (Imp...
Balak Ram Vs. Kanehya
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-1968
Reported in: 4(1968)DLT384
I.D. Dua, C.J. (1) These three revisions (Civil Revisions Nos. 41, 42, and 47 of 1967) raising, as they do, a common question, are being disposed of by one judgment. The facts of C.k. No. 41 of 1947 alone may be adverted to. (2) Balak Ram and Shiv Ram, sons of Bali Ram, instituted a suit for permanent injunction against Kanebya, son of Bhajju, restraining him from interfering with their possession of the suit land measuring 15 bighas 13 bids was situated in village Rajana, Fargana Jajhto, Kasumpti. It was alleged by the plaintiffs that they were the owners in possession of the land in dispute and that Kanehya defendant had been wrongly recorded in the revenue papers to be in possession of the suit land as a tenant. The defendant had made an application before the Compensation Officer, Mahasu for acquiring proprietary rights of the land in dispute under section 11 of the Himachal Pradesh Abolition of Big Landed Estates and Land Reforms Act (hereafter called the Abolition Act) on the bas...
K.B. Shukla and ors. Vs. the Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-1968
Reported in: ILR1969Delhi80
S.N. Andley, J.(1) -THESE three writ petitions (CW Nos. 256, 257 and 258 of 1968) have been brought by the petitioners who became members of the Delhi and Himachal Pradesh Civil Service in 1962 after passing a competitive examination. The Delhi and Himachal Pradesh Civil Service, hereinafter referred to as 'the 1961 Service' was constituted in 1961 and the President, in exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution and all toher powers enabling him in that behalf, made the Delhi and Himachal Pradesh Civil Service Rules, 1961, hereinafter referred to as 'the 1961 Rules'. The 1961 Rules were repealed by rule 37 of the Delhi, Himachal Pradesh and Andaman and Nicobar Islands Civil Service Rules, 1965, hereinafter referred to as 'the Dhanics Rules'. The Dhanics Rules were also made by the President in exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution and all toher powers enabling him in that behalf and governed the Delhi,...
The Ganesh Flour Mills Vs. the Chief Commissioner, Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-03-1968
Reported in: 5(1969)DLT187; [1968]22STC264(Delhi)
I.D. Dua, C.J. and Hardyal Hardy, J. (1) The petitioner is a dealer registered under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 which will hereafter be referred to as the Act, and was granted a Registration Certificate under Rule 5(1) of the Central Sales Tax (Registration and Turnover) Rules, 1957. In the appropriate columns (a) and (b) the Words 'Empty Tins' and 'Tin sheets' were respectively entered accoring to its own application. (2) On 11th December, 1958 the petitioner applied to the Sales Tax Officer, Ward No. 5, Delhi to amend its Registration Certificate so as to include 'Tin Plates' or 'Tin Sheets' on the allegation that those were used by the petitioner for packing its vegetable products for sale under Section 8(3) of the Act. (3) By his order dated 19th January, 1959 the application was refused by the Assistant Sales Tax officer on the ground that those were declared goods and as such their purchase on the strength of the Registration Certificate could be allowed only if they were to...
Delhi Administration, Through Secretary, Transport, Delhi Vs. State of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-02-1968
Reported in: AIR1969Delhi58
ORDER1. This is an application by the Delhi Administration purporting to be under Article 133(1)(b) and (c) of the Constitution, but praying in the end that the case being of public importance, be certified to be a fit one for appeal to the Supreme Court under Article 133(1)(c). The judgment sought to be appealed from was delivered by a bench of this Court on 20-10-1967 allowing C. W. 1376 of 1967 presented by the State of Haryana and quashing the order of the Inter-State transport Commission and of the Inter-State Transport Appellate Tribunal.2. The short question raised in these proceedings, broadly speaking, relates to the construction of section 48 (3) (xiv) of the Motor Vehicles Act and it arises in this way. Public service buses running from the Union Territory of Delhi to the Union territory of Chandigarh have to pass through Karnal (in Haryana). Through tickets are issued to the passengers traveling by such vehicles from Delhi right up to Chandigarh. The Inter-State Transport C...
Nanak Chand Benarsi Das and ors. Vs. Chander Kishore and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-02-1968
Reported in: AIR1969Delhi235; 1969CriLJ965
ORDER1. These two criminal revisions viz., Criminal Revision No. 339-D of 1965 and Criminal Revision No. 185-D of 1966 have arisen out of a reference made by an Addl. Sessions Judge recommending that the monthly maintenance under Section 488 of Cr. P. C, allowed by the trial Magistrate to Chander Kishore and other who are petitioners in Criminal Revision No. 339-D of 1965 be enhanced while the revision petition filed by their father Nanak Chand who is petitioner in Criminal Revision No. 185-D of 1966 and respondent in Criminal Revision No. 339-D of 1965, be dismissed. Both the petitions were heard together and were disposed of by a common judgment.2. The case originally came before J. S. Bedi J. of the Punjab High Court at Delhi but considering the importance of the questions of law involved in it and a marked divergence of judicial opinion on the question whether the word 'child' in Section 488 (1) Criminal Procedure Code means a person of tender years or a person who has nto attained...
Ganga Ram Vs. Khiala Ram Bansi Lal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-1968
Reported in: 4(1968)DLT676
T.V.R Tatachari, J.(1) This Second Appeal has been filed by one Ganga Ram, a judgment.debtor, against the jadgment of the District Judge, Mahasu and Kinnaur Districts, Himachal Pradesh, dated 20th December, 1966, in C M.A.No 37-M/l4 of 1968. whereby the District Judge confirmed the order of the Senior Subordinate Judge, Mahasu District, Simla, dated 19th March, 1966, in application No. 5/6 of 1965 on his file. The said application was filed by the appellant herein, Ganga Ram, under Order 9 rule 13 and section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, for setting aside an ex parte decree, dated 14th November, 1962, passed against him by the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Rampur.(2) The fact which gave rise to the filing of this aforesaid application are as follows. The respondent herein Messrs Khiali Ram Bansi Lall, filed a suit against the appellant herein in the Court of the Subordinate Judge Rampur, on 2Srd April, 1955, for rendition of accounts. The appellant (defendant) filed his writte...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›