Delhi Court August 1967 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Manohar Singh Vs. Kanshi Ram and Sons
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-11-1967
Reported in: 3(1967)DLT590
Hardyal Hardy, J. (1) This second appeal has been filed by a tenant whose eviction has been ordered from a small loom described as a servant quarter and an open court-yard in a (2) The respondents had purchased bungalow No. 49 on Hanuman Road, New Delhi in 1958. At the time of purchase ey gto vacant possession of the entire bungalow except a small room described as a servant quarter and an open Court-yard which was in occupation of the appellant who claimed to have been in possession of the said portion of the property for the last 30 to 35 years, as according to him his father was an employee of the previous owner. The respondents who were Joint owners of the said bungalow with their father (since deceased) started living in the bungalow immediately after it was purchased by them. On the evidence that has been accepted by buth the Courts below, the respondents' family consisted of 18 or 19 members. Although the bungalow appears to be a fairly commodious one, the respondents sought evi...
Visanji Velji Somays Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-1967
Reported in: ILR1968Delhi120
S.K. Kapnr, J. (1) This judgment will dispose of Civil Writ Petitions Nos. 237-D to 241-D of 1962 and 249-D to 251-D of 1961 as the learned counsel agree that the questions of law and fact arising in all these writ petitions are the same. These cases were heard on 27/4/1967, but the judgment was reserved because the learned counsel for the respondents wanted time to obtain instructions whether or nto the Government was willing to issue license to the petitioners. Disinclination of the Government to issue such licenses was communicated to me on the day I was leaving Delhi to work at the Circuit Bench at Simla.(2) In view of the common questions arising in all the writ petitions, I am reciting the facts of Civil Writ Petition No. 237-D of 1962 only. An Open General license dated 27/1/1952 was issued by the Central Government giving permission to all persons to import by country craft from certain places in middle East and East Africa, set out in the license, all or any of the goods speci...
Collector Land Acquisition Vs. Bhadia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-1967
Reported in: 3(1967)DLT562
I.D. Dua, C.J. (1) This appeal, which is directed against the award given hy the learned Additional District Judge, Mandi on 30th June, 1966 on a reference made under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, initially came up before Hardy, J. who felt that the appeal deserved to be disposed of by a larger Bench. In order to understand the difficulty faced by the learned Judge, it may be stated that the land which is the subject-matter of the acquisition and of the proceedings for payment of compensation is situated in village Tamroh, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi. The acquisition was made for the cons- truction of Hydel Channel by Beas Sutlej' Link Project Autholities. Ntoification under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act was issued on 30th April, 1964 and under sections 6, 7 and 17(4) on 24th March, 1965. Land had also been acquiried in villages of Malhanoo, Daan and Rau and in those cases, the learned Additional District Judge had already given his awards. Those villages, it is comm...
S. Sewa Singh Gill Vs. Income-tax Officer, B-iii District, New Delhi, ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-1967
Reported in: [1968]70ITR534(Delhi)
This is petition under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of India, paying for (i) write, order to direction in the nature of mandamus or toherwise directing the respondents to revise the assessment order for 1944-45 assessment year in consequence of the findings in the assessment order of February, 1954, and (ii) writ, order to direction in the nature of mandamus of toherwise directing the respondents to refund the sum of Rs. 15,224 plus interest thereon since 1945. The petitioner has imp leaded the Income-tax Officer, B/III District, New Delhi, the Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi, and the Secretary, Central Board of Direct Taxes, New Delhi, as respondents in this petition. The petitioner in his petition states that during the financial years 1943-44 and 1944-45, the petitioner derived his income mostly from contracts and he undertook the contract of construction of W. A. C. quarters at Lytton Road, New Delhi; the work for construction of the said quarters was started on Novem...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›