Delhi Court June 1967 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nagar Panchayat Jhajha (Nagar Sabha) Bhuj Vs. the State of Punjab
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-07-1967
Reported in: ILR1968Delhi90
S.K. Kapur, J. (1) Nagar Panchayat Jhajha (Nagar Sabha) filed a suit against the State of Punjab for recovery of Rs. 1,365-22 Paisa on the allegations that the Nagar Panchayat (Nagar Sabha) Jhajha became the owner of Shamlat-Deh area in Chabri, Shakog, Mihani and toher villages by virtue of the Pepsu Village Common Lands Act (Act No. 15 of 1955) and all rights, title and interest in the Shamlat-Deh lands vested in the plaintiff; that the Forest Department auctioned some trees in October/November 1956 of which the plaintiff had become owner without any right and without the consent of the plaintiff; that the sale proceeds amounting to Rs. 2,730-44 Paisa were recovered by the Forest Department from the auction purchasers and out of the amount so realized only Rs. 1,365-22 Paisa were paid to the plaintiff; that the balance amount of Rs. 1,365-22 Paisa was nto paid to the plaintiff inspire of repeated requests and that the Forest Department Kandaghat had adjusted this amount illegally towa...
The Municipal Committee, Simla Vs. A.R. Pasricha and Co. (Pvt.) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-06-1967
Reported in: 3(1967)DLT612
S.K. Kapur, J.(1) The plaintiff filed a suit against the Municipal Committee Simla for recovery of Rs. 11,520.80 np being the amount alleged to have been illegally charged as octroi from the plaintiff and Rs. 2,765 on account of interest on the said amount at the rate of twelve per cent per annum from 16/7/1962, that is, the date of service of ntoice under section 49 of the Punjab Municipal Act on the defendant Committee. The plaintiff also claimed future interest at the same rate.(2) The principal allegations of the plaintiff were that between 13/9/1959, and 12/8/1960, it brought timber from Himachal Pradesh Forests to Simla Railway Station Goods Shed and Summer Hill Goods Shed on transit passes after making declarations at the Sanjauli Import Barrier that the goods were meant for export; that those goods were in fact exported immediately when the railway wagons were available; and that the railway receipts were shown at the Export Barrier but the Municipal staff declined to look at t...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›