Delhi Court May 1967 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Springdales School, New Delhi and ors. Vs. Sati Tahilramani, New Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-1967
Reported in: AIR1969Delhi7
1. This appeal was filed by the appellants-tenants under Order 43, Rule 1 (m) of the Code of Civil Procedure against the order of the Additional Rent Controller, Delhi, dated 2-1-1967, dismissing an application filed by the said appellants-tenants for recording an alleged compromise in the Application No. 877 of 1963, on his file.2. The above-mentioned Application No. 877 of 1963 was filed by the respondent-landlord before the Additional Rent Controller, Delhi, under Section 14 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, praying for the eviction of the appellants-tenants from the premises, 'Sati Villa', No. 1945/14, situated on Patel Road, West Patel Nagar, New Delhi-12, and included in Municipal Ward No. 17, on the grounds of sub-letting, assignment or parting with the possession of the premises, misuse of the premises for a purpose other than that for which the premises were let out, etc.3. In the course of the said proceedings, the respondent herein filed an application on 1-8-1966 under S...
Ram Saran Das Raja Ram and anr. Vs. Lala Ram Chander
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-1967
Reported in: AIR1968Delhi233
1. This is a defendants appeal from the judgment and decree of a learned subordinate judge 1st Class, Delhi, whereby the plaintiff's suit for recovery of Rs. 6,434-10-9 was decreed with costs against the defendants with interest at 4 percent per annum from the date of the suit till the date of realization.2. The plaintiff Ram Chander, proprietor of Jindal Oil Mills, Delhi-Shahdra, pleaded in the plaint that on 3-5-1954, the defendants Messrs. Ram Saran Das Raja Ram, whose partner Raja Ram was also imp leaded as defendant No. 2, entered into a contract of purchase of one tank wagon (about 500 maunds) of mustardoil at Rs. 61 per maund F. O. R. Delhi-Shahdra (Bilti cut) with a condition of 1/2 per cent leakage. The tank was to be dispatched to Kirkand, the place of business of the defendants. The plaintiff dispatched one tank wagon weighing 505 maunds of mustard oil in accordance with this contract as per R/R No. 149067 from Delhi Shahdra to Kirkend. The R/R was sent to the defendants thr...
Madan Lal Vs. the Superintendent Tehar Jail and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-1967
Reported in: 1968CriLJ821
ORDER1. Madan Lal has approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India complaining against the arrest and detention of Bhagwan Dass Shastri and praying that the said Bhagwan Dass Shastri be directed to be produced in this Court and be dealt with in accordance with law. His detention is stated, to be illegal and improper. It may be pointed out that originally Madan Lai had complained against the arrest and detention of 1,057 persons mentioned in Part. 1 of the petition and prayed for their production in this Court on the allegation that they had been illegally arrested and were being illegally and improperly detained. When this original petition came up for preliminary hearing before us at the mtoion stage, we pointed out to the petitioner that full details of the circumstances in which each individual detainee had been arrested and dealt with should be separately' specified and that the manner in which one petition had been filed, tended to create confusion. When co...
Darshan Singh Vs. Hari Nath
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-1967
Reported in: 3(1967)DLT459
M.M. Ismail, J. (1) One Damodar Dass filed a suit against Nirbhe Ram of Shahpura (Rajasthan) for himself and representing Ram Bhais and Ram Sanahies residing in Katra Nil, Chandni Chowk, :Delhi for adeclaration that the defendant and toher sadhus and fakirs belonging to Ram Bhai sect have no right to let out abuilding which is called Ramdawara or any portion thereof to any tenant or tenants and for a permanent injunction restraining the defendant -and his followers fakirs and Sadhus of Ram Bhai sect from committing any of the said acts. The said suit was disposed of on 30th July 1937 and a decree for declaration and permanent injunction was passed. (2) In April, 1956 the present Execution application was filed by the respondent herein against the appellant herein on the allegation that contrary to the injunction granted in the suit, rooms in Rarndwara have been let out to tenants. Before proceeding further, two things must -be pointed out, one is, that the defendant Nirbhe Ram was imp ...
Pragowati Devi Vs. Bhawani Shankek Basrurker
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-1967
Reported in: 3(1967)DLT545
M.M. Ismail, J.(1) The landlady, who is the appellant before this Court, filed an application under section .14 of the Delhi Rent Control Ait, 1958, for the eviction of the respondent-tenant on several grounds, two of which alone were argued before me and those two grounds, as set out in the application, are as follows : '(I)that the tenant has sublet, assigned, and toherwise parted with the possession of a part of the premises without obtaining the consent in writing from the landlady ; and (ii) the premises let for residential purposes are required bona fide by the landlady and for members of her family, and the landlady has no toher reasonably suitable accommodation.'(2) The respondent-tenant denied the allegations contained in the application. He expressly stated that there was no agreement as to the letting purpose or to the nature of user to which the premises would be put and it was, thereforee, incorrect that the premises were residential. He further denied that the premises we...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›