Delhi Orders Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rahul@Pankaj@Fauzi vs State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jun-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN.1349/2026 RAHUL@PANKAJ@FAUZI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Satish Chand, AdvocateversusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the StateCORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 10.06.20261. Bail Application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. read with Section 482Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the Applicant for grant of interim bail for 06 months on account of treatment of Kochs (Miliary TB+TBM) ailment.2. It is submitted in the Application that the Applicant is facing trial inFIR No. 227/2020 under Sections 307/34 IPC read with Section 27 Arms Act, P.S. Wazirabad, Delhi.3. The Applicant is suffering from serious ailments while lodged inMandoli Jail No. 13, Delhi. The Applicant was granted Interim Bail on 20.12.2025 on medical grounds. He got admitted in GTB Hospital by jail authorities and was released from judicial custody on 23.12.2025. Subsequently, he was discha...
Achin Birpalia & Ors. vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jun-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3499/2026, CRL.M.A. 14200/2026 ACHIN BIRPALIA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ankur Chawla, Mr. Arshdeep Singh, Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Mr. Bakul Jain, Mr. Harsh Yadav, Mr. Harshit Melti and Mr. Chetan Nagpal, Advs.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the StateCORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 10.06.20261. Learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present Petition.2. In view of the submissions made, the present Petition is permitted to be withdrawn.3. The Petition stands disposed of accordingly. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA (VACATION JUDGE) JUNE 10, 2026 vaThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/06/2026 at 11:40:35...
Soumya Verma vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jun-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL)1681/2026, CRL.M.A. 16865/2026 SOUMYA VERMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikas Rao & Mr. Milind Modi, Advocates Petitioner through VCversusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC for the State with Mr. Sangeet Sibou, Advocate along with SI Vijaypal Singh Shubham Verma through VCCORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 10.06.20261. Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read withSection 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed to quash the FIR No. emanating therefrom.2. It is submitted that marriage of Petitioner Soumya Verma (wife) andShubham Verma (husband) was solemnized on 16.08.2021 as per Hindu Rites and Customs and out of their wedlock, one child was born. However, due to temperamental differences between Shubham Verma (Husband) and the Petitioner (wife), they started living separate...
Iti Club of India & Anr. vs Directorate General of Training
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jun-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ LPA 427/2026, CM APPL. 37618/2026, CM APPL. 37619/2026 ITI CLUB OF INDIA & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Ravi Chandra Prakash, Adv. (through VC)versusDIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TRAINING .....Respondent Through: Mr. Piyush Beriwal, SPC with Mr. Sarthak Rana, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 10.06.20261. The present Letters Patent Appeal (hereinafter, LPA) under clause Xof the Letters Patent has been filed by the Appellants against the order dated 10.04.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No. 4481/2026 titled ITI Club of India & Anr. V. Directorate General of Training.2. After some submissions, the learned counsel for the Appellants seeks to withdraw the present LPA with liberty to file a review against the impugnedorder dated 10.04.2026.3. The present appeal is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to avail remedies in accordance with law. Accordingl...
Prakash Marotrao Lonare vs Ramdas P Sandhe and Ors & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jun-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 1303/2026, CM APPL. 38722- 38724/2026 PRAKASH MAROTRAO LONARE .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given.versusRAMDAS P SANDHE AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amjad Hussain, Adv. for R-1 & 2 Mr. Nasim Anwar, Adv. for R-3.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 10.06.20261. Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filedon behalf of the Petitioner, who is Member of purported New Board of Fishcopfed, for setting aside impugned common Order dated 01.06.2026 containing the record of proceedings held on 29.05.2026 and 30.05.2026 passed by learned Sole Arbitrator, whereby Petitioners Right to address oral arguments has been closed.2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner, on query, submits that written submissions have already been filed and the matter is listed tomorrow, i.e. 11.06.2026 for clarification.3. Learned counsel for the Respondents appear on advance Notice,accept Notice an...
Hemant @ Sukha vs the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jun-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 2195/2026, CRL.M.A. 17946/2026 HEMANT @ SUKHA .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for StateCORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 10.06.20261. After some arguments, learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw present Bail Application.2. In view of submissions made, present Bail Application along with pending Applications stands dismissed as withdrawn. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA (VACATION JUDGE) JUNE 10, 2026/RThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/06/2026 at 11:39:40...
Maharaja Agrasen Hospital vs Govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jun-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8064/2026 MAHARAJA AGRASEN HOSPITAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kushal Malhotra, Adv.versusGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Poonam, SPC with Mr. Amit Acharya, GP & Mr. Kavish Lakra, SI.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 10.06.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that patient has already been discharged from the hospital and, therefore, seeks to withdraw the present petition.3. In view of above, the petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.4. The order be uploaded forthwith on the website.MADHU JAIN, J.(VACATION JUDGE) JUNE 10, 2026 ab/Av This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/06/2026 at 11:42:11...
Adesh Kumar vs Ncb
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jun-08-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 785/2026ADESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shirish Singh, Advocate.versusNCB .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 08.06.20261. Learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw thepresent Bail Application with liberty to file afresh before the learned Trial Court on medical grounds.2. In view of the submissions made, the present Bail Application ispermitted to be withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.3. The Bail Application is disposed of.4. The next date already fixed of 15.07.2026, stands cancelled.NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, JJUNE 8, 2026/VAThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/06/2026 at 11:00:10...
Tarik vs the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jun-08-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 2062/2026, CRL.M.A. 17059/2026 TARIK .....Petitioner Through: Counsel for Petitioner (appearance not given)versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for the StateCORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 08.06.20261. Second Bail Application under Section 482 of B.N.S.S., 2023 orSection 438 of Cr.P.C., 1973, has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner for grant of Anticipatory Bail in case arising out of FIR No. 240/2026 dated 30.03.2026 under Section 110/126(2)/3(5) of BNS, 2023 registered at Police Station Kalindi Kunj, Delhi.2. It is stated that in an incident which took place on 29.03.2026 atabout 11:30 p.m. in front of B-448, Gali No. 5, Jaitpur Extn., Part-2, Delhi, a petty neighbourhood dispute arose in regard to a scooter parked in front of the Complainants house. There were five named accused including the Applicant, Tarik. The allegations were that co-accused, Tohid ...
Rakesh Chauhan vs the State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jun-08-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 2190/2026, CRL.M.A. 17921/2026 RAKESH CHAUHAN .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given.versusTHE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for State.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 08.06.20261. First Bail Application under Section 482 BNSS has been filed onbehalf of the Petitioner Rakesh Chauhan for grant of Anticipatory Bail in FIR No.0183/2026 dated 14.05.2026 under Section 64(1)/69/123 BNS, 2023 registered at Police Station Swaroop Nagar, Delhi.2. As per the FIR, the Prosecutrix made a Complaint stating that sinceNovember, 2024 she and the Applicant became close while they were working in the same store and started meeting each other and even started talking on the phone till late night. On 29.11.2025 it was the birthday of the Application and he had hosted a small party at his house to celebrate the occasion. The Prosecutrix had also been invited to atte...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »