Delhi Orders Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Prakash Mahavidyalaya vs Pharmacy Council of India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jun-17-2026
$~SB25 & 26* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8247/2026 & CM APPL. 39022/2026 PRAKASH MAHAVIDYALAYA ..Petitioner Through: Mr. Mayank Manish, Mr. Ravi Kant & Mr. Vineet Upadhyay, Advs.VersusPHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIA ..Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh & Mr. Divyansh Singh, Advs. AND + W.P.(C) 8248/2026 & CM APPL. 39023/2026 KKLK COLLEGE OF PHARMACY ..Petitioner Through: Mr. Mayank Manish, Mr. Ravi Kant & Mr. Vineet Upadhyay, Advs.VersusPHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIA ..Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh & Mr. Divyansh Singh, Advs.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 17.06.20261. The learned Counsel for the Petitioners states that the Petitioners would like to withdraw the present Petitions with liberty to file fresh Petitions, if required.2. Accordingly, the present Petitions as well as the pending Applications are dismissed as withdrawn. TEJAS KARIA, J (VACATION JUDGE) JUNE 17, 2026 gsrThis is a digitally signed order. The aut...
Mohit Gupta vs State Nct Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jun-17-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 2073/2026 & CRL.M.A. 17149/2026 MOHIT GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr Azhar Qayum, Mr. Shahamuddin, Mr. Zubair, Ms. Priyanka Singh, Mr. Devansh Sehgal, Advs.versusSTATE NCT DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aman Ushman, APP for the State.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 17.06.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present application has been filed by the Petitioner under Section483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as the BNSS), seeking grant of interim bail to the Applicant/Petitioner on medical grounds in FIR No. 19/2026 dated 29.01.2026 registered at Police Station Crime Branch, Delhi for the offences punishable under Sections (hereinafter referred to as the NDPS Act). The following prayers are set out below:- a) Grant interim bail to the Applicant for a period of 4 months on medical grounds; b) Permit the Applicant to undergo treatment a...
M/S Wave Geo-Services Private Limited vs M/S Devi Engineering and Cons ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jun-17-2026
$~SB-35* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 446/2026 M/S WAVE GEO-SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aru Prakash, Advocate.versusM/S DEVI ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manideep Madhavarapu and Mr. Sharath Chandupatla.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 17.06.20261. This Petition is filed on behalf of the Petitioner under Section 29A(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, inter alia, seeking extension of mandate of learned Sole Arbitrator by a period of six months.2. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the Partieshave already partly addressed final arguments before the learned Arbitrator and only limited proceedings and procedural compliances remain to be concluded before the matter can be reserved for award.3. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that thePetitioner had earlier approached this Court seeking extension of the mandate of the learned...
Dr. Neha Chauhan vs Himanshu Pokharia
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jun-17-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 1042/2026 & CM APPL. 38688/2026 DR. NEHA CHAUHAN ..Petitioner Through: Ms. Zeba Khair, Ms. Sitwat Nabi & Ms. Harshita Singhal, Advs.VersusHIMANSHU POKHARIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sagar, Sr. Adv. with Ashok Kumar Jha, Adv. along with Respondent in person & Ms. Khyati Raje, Minor Child.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 17.06.20261. In compliance of the order dated 15.06.2026, the Respondent along with minor child is present in the Court.2. During the pre-lunch session, the Court had interacted with the minor child as well as the Petitioner. The Petitioner and the minor child also spent one and a half hours with each other during the course of the day.3. When the matter was taken up again during the post-lunch session, thelearned Counsel for the Parties, after interacting with the Petitioner and the minor child, submitted that some understanding has been arrived at between the Parties to the...
Abhishek Singh vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jun-17-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 2239/2026 & CRL.M.A. 18043/2026 ABHISHEK SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Himanshu Kundu, Adv.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for the StateCORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 17.06.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. CRL.M.A. 18043/2026 (Exemption)2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. BAIL APPLN. 2239/20263. The present application has been filed under Section 483 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking extension of the interim bail granted to the Applicant/Petitioner by this Court vide order dated 29.05.2026 in Bail Application No. 1567/2026 in FIR No. 337/2024 registered at Police Station Patparganj Industrial Area under Sections4. Learned counsel for the Applicant/Petitioner submits that the Applicantwas granted interim bail to take care of his wife and to complete the admission formalities of his...
Kklk College of Pharmacy vs Pharmacy Council of India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jun-17-2026
$~SB25 & 26* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8247/2026 & CM APPL. 39022/2026 PRAKASH MAHAVIDYALAYA ..Petitioner Through: Mr. Mayank Manish, Mr. Ravi Kant & Mr. Vineet Upadhyay, Advs.VersusPHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIA ..Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh & Mr. Divyansh Singh, Advs. AND + W.P.(C) 8248/2026 & CM APPL. 39023/2026 KKLK COLLEGE OF PHARMACY ..Petitioner Through: Mr. Mayank Manish, Mr. Ravi Kant & Mr. Vineet Upadhyay, Advs.VersusPHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIA ..Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh & Mr. Divyansh Singh, Advs.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 17.06.20261. The learned Counsel for the Petitioners states that the Petitioners would like to withdraw the present Petitions with liberty to file fresh Petitions, if required.2. Accordingly, the present Petitions as well as the pending Applications are dismissed as withdrawn. TEJAS KARIA, J (VACATION JUDGE) JUNE 17, 2026 gsrThis is a digitally signed order. The aut...
Jagdish Lal & Ors. vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jun-17-2026
$~SB-19* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8190/2026, CM APPL. 38914/2026 & CM APPL. 38915/2026 JAGDISH LAL & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Shlok Sudhan, Advocate.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vikas Chopra, Standing Counsel with Neeraj Kumar, Advocate for MCD.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 17.06.20261. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that the Petitioners wish to withdraw the present Writ Petition.2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. TEJAS KARIA, J (VACATION JUDGE) JUNE 17, 2026/smsThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/06/2026 at 10:46:21...
Abhishek vs the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jun-17-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 2252/2026 ABHISHEK .....Petitioner Through: Mr. D.V. Goyal, Advocate.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar- APP for State (through VC). Inspector Om Vir Singh (PS Samaypur Badli).CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 17.06.20261. The present Application has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking Interim Bail for a period of four weeks to appear for his examination.2. The learned Counsel for the Applicant submitted that the examschedule of the Applicant starts with effect from 18.06.2026 to 20.06.2026 for the 2nd Semester University Exams. It is further submitted on behalf of the Applicant that the exam schedule was received by the Applicants parents on 15.06.2026 at 4:00 PM.3. The Applicant is registered in the Bachelor of Arts (B.A.) course in S.M.R.C.K. College, Bazar Samiti, Samastipur, Bihar-848104, and videorder dated 16.03.2026, this ...
Krishna Devi vs State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jun-15-2026
$~SB-21* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1785/2026 KRISHNA DEVI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddarth Yadav and Mr. Anmol Kumar Pandey, Advocates.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Priyam Agrawal and Mr. Abhinav Arya, Advocates for Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel for State. Insp. Devinder Kumar, PS Khyala.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 15.06.20261. This is a Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of the order dated 21.05.2026 passed by the Respondent.2. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the only groundfor rejecting the application for grant of parole was in view of Rule 1212 of the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018 (Rules), which stipulates that there should be one month gap between the parole and last furlough availed and vice-versa.3. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that Rule 1212 of th...
Pallavi Siwach @ Pallavi vs Gaurav Dabas
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jun-15-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 1307/2026 & CM APPL. 38829/2026, CM APPL. 38830/2026 PALLAVI SIWACH @ PALLAVI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Kumar and Mr. Shashikant, Advs.versusGAURAV DABAS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Prateek Goswami, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 15.06.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. After some arguments, learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits thathe wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. He also seeks liberty to mention the matter before the Vacation Bench on account of urgency.3. The said liberty is granted. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.4. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.MADHU JAIN, J.(VACATION JUDGE) JUNE 15, 2026/prg/Av This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »