Delhi Orders Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Bloom Jindal Jv in Association With Kapil Muni Infra Project Priva ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ LPA 407/2026 M/S BLOOM JINDAL JV IN ASSOCIATION WITH KAPIL MUNI INFRA PROJECT PRIVATE LIMITED .....Appellant Through: Mr. M. Dutta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Pavan Kumar Chaturvedi, Mr. Aditya Guha and Mr. Anand K. Soni, Advocates.versusNATIONAL HIGHWAYS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 29.05.2026 CM APPL. 38369/20261. This is an Application seeking withdrawal of the present Appeal.2. Accordingly, the present Appeal being LPA 407/2026 is dismissed as withdrawn.3. It is needless to say that the liberty granted by the learned Single Judge in the impugned order dated 07.05.2026 shall be available.4. The next date of hearing in LPA 407/2026, i.e., 20.07.2026 stands cancelled. DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ TEJAS KARIA, J MAY 29, 2026 apThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi ...
Madhu Seth & Anr. vs MCD & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7479/2026 & CM APPL. 36295/2026 MADHU SETH & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Manu Sishodia and Ms. Hina Rajput, Advocates (through VC)versusMCD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kapil Dutta, Advocate for MCD. Mr. Rajesh Kumar and Mr. Siddharth Shekhar, Advocates for UoI Mr. Samman Vardhan Gautam, Ms. Khushi Sharma, Mr. Priyam Tiwari and Ms. Anshika Priyadarshini, Advocates for R-3.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 29.05.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to therespondents to stop the unauthorised construction on the roof of the third floor of the property bearing no. B-1/170, Janakpuri, New Delhi-110058 (hereinafter subject property).2. It is stated that despite a status quo order passed by the AppellateTribunal, MCD (ATMCD) on 2nd April, 2026, the private respondent no.3 is still carrying out unauthorised construction. Photographs have been placed on record show...
Vasudev Excellence College & Anr. vs Rashmi Shukla, Regional Director ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 1019/2026 VASUDEV EXCELLENCE COLLEGE AND ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Ms. Priti Kumari and Mr. Pankaj Kumar Ray, Advs.versusRASHMI SHUKLA, REGIONAL DIRECTOR WESTERN REGIONAL COMMITTEE NCTE & ANR. ......Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Mr. Shivom Sethi, Mr. Nandeesh Nanda, Advs. along with Mr. Puneet Kumar, LC, WRC.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 29.05.20261. At the outset, learned counsel for the National Council for TeacherEducation (NCTE) assures that the requisite restoration order qua the petitioner shall be duly communicated to the concerned university (Rani Avantibhai Lodhi University, Sagar, Madhya Pradesh) immediately and that the necessary updation would also be made in the concerned website/s, inter-alia, the website of the Western Regional Committee (WRC), to enable the petitioner to participate in ongoing counselling for the Academic Session 2026-27.2. Let the needful b...
Ms Mbl Infrastructure Limited vs Ms R S Yadav Projects Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 443/2026 MS MBL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Anusuya Salwan and Mr. Rachit Wadhwa, AdvocatesversusMS R S YADAV PROJECTS PVT LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Lakshay Kaushik and Mr. Bilal Khan, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASADORDER% 29.05.20261. The present petition under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed by the Petitioner for extending the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal.2. Material on record indicates that an Arbitral Tribunal was constitutedby this Court vide Order dated 02.08.2023 passed in an arbitration petition being ARB.P. No. 520/2023. It is stated that the last of the mandate was extended by this Court vide Order dated 26.09.2025 for a period of nine months from 12.09.2026. The mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal is going to expire on 11.06.2026, and therefore, the present petition has been filed for extending the mandate...
Uv Asset Reconstruction Company Limited vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 9537/2020 UV ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dhruv Dewan, Mr. Yajur Sharma, Ms. Sanjukta Roy, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Jitendra Kumar Tripathi, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Ramesh Babu and Ms. Nisha Sharma, Advocates for RBI. Mr. Mukul Singh, CGSC along with Mr. Aryan Dhaka and Ms. Sunidhi Tyagi, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Vikas Mehta, Ms. Nitika Grover, Mr. Kartik Pandey, Advocates for IBBI.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 29.05.2026 CM APPL. 37833/2026 (seeking withdrawal of petition)1. By way of the present application, the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition i.e., W.P.(C) 9537/2020, with liberty to file a response to the show cause notice dated 12.11.2020 issued by the respondent no.2.2. The said application is not opposed.3. Considering the circumstances, the present application is allowed.4. Let the said response to the show ca...
Sunny vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 2102/2026, CRL.M.A. 17329/2026, CRL.M.A. SUNNY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. C Mohan Rao, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Lokesh Kumar Sharma AdvsversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP SI AjitCORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 29.05.20261. By way of the present application filed under Section 483 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS], the applicant seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 132/2024 dated 06.04.2024, registered at Police Station Special Cell, for offences punishable under Sections 420/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC].2. The prosecution case, as emerging from the reply filed to theapplicants bail application before the learned Sessions Court, is as follows: a) The FIR was registered on the basis of a complaint lodged by one Mr. Jitendarjit Singh Ahluwalia, a senior citizen, who stated that his mobile number was added to a WhatsApp group namely A...
Tp Central Odisha Distribution Limited vs Seaside Utilities Private Li ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 433/2026 TP CENTRAL ODISHA DISTRIBUTION LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anand Kumar Srivastava, Ms. Ishita Jain, Mr. Chetan Saxena and Mr. Mudassir, Advocates.versusSEASIDE UTILITIES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Jayant Bajaj, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANORDER% 29.05.20261. The present joint petition has been filed by the parties under Section29A (4) and (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal for a period of six months w.e.f 31.05.2026 till 30.11.2026.2. I am satisfied that sufficient cause has been shown for extending the mandate of the learned Tribunal.3. Accordingly, the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal is extended for a period of six months w.e.f 31.05.2026 till 30.11.2026.4. The petition stands disposed of. VIKAS MAHAJAN, J MAY 29, 2026/jgThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can b...
Sandeep Kumar @ Sanjiv Kumar vs the State (G.N.C.T.D)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 4357/2026, CRL.M.A. 17574/2026 SANDEEP KUMAR @ SANJIV KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Chandan Kumar Mandal, Adv.versusTHE STATE (G.N.C.T.D) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Kiran Bairwa, APP for the State.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 29.05.2026 By way of the present petition filed under section 528 read with sections 355/530 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (BNSS), the petitioner impugns order dated 11.04.2026 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in case bearing SC No. 57698/2016, whereby the learned sessions court has rejected the petitioners application filed under sections 228/355 BNSS seeking exemption from personal appearance.2. The petitioner is facing trial in case FIR No. 1037/2015 registeredunder sections 363/376-D/506/120-B-34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 20...
Meena Bakshi (Sr. Citizen) vs Mitesh Thakur & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 1263/2026 & CM APPL. 37504/2026 MEENA BAKSHI (SR. CITIZEN) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Grover and Mr. Siddharth Pandit, Advocates.versusMITESH THAKUR & ORS. .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 29.05.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. After some arguments, learned Counsel for the petitioner seekspermission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to move an appropriate application before the State Commission for expeditious disposal of the execution petition, as the same pertains to the year 2018 and the petitioner is a senior citizen.3. Keeping in view the submissions of the learned Counsel for thepetitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for, in accordance with law. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J MAY 29, 2026/MR/TP This is a digitally sig...
Shri Vijay Kumar vs the State Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
$~5 Q* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 4314/2026 SHRI VIJAY KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhinav Tyagi and Mr. Rahul Pawar, Advocates with the petitioner in person.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP with SI Harish Kumar, PS Amar ColonyCORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 29.05.20261. The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]), seeking quashing of FIR No. 281/2016 dated 30.04.2016, registered under Sections 420/406 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, [IPC] at Police Station Amar Colony, District South-East Delhi, and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground of settlement.2. Issue notice. Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, learned Additional Standing Counsel (Criminal), accepts notice on behalf of the State. Respondent No. 2 is present through video...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »