Delhi Orders Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajanya Ravasia vs Shuchi Mehra Ravasia
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 426/2026 RAJANYA RAVASIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Prabhjit Jauhar, Ms. Rosemary Raju, Ms. Chahat Raghav and Ms. Shreyangana Bag, Advocates.versusSHUCHI MEHRA RAVASIA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Geeta Luthra, Sr. Advocate along with Ms. Prashansika Thakur, Advs. Respondent in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 29.05.2026 The matter is taken up today as 28.05.2026 was declared a holiday on account of Id-ul-Zuha (Bakrid).1. Respective counsel for the parties inform that a settlement has beenarrived at between the parties; a copy of the settlement agreement dated 29.05.2026 has been handed over during the course of hearing. Let the same be filed in the Registry of this Court. The same, inter-alia, provides as under:- 2. That it has been mutually agreed between the parties that the First Party shall pay unto the Second Party sum of Rs.8,25,00,000/- (Rupees Eight Crore and Twenty Five Lakhs only) in f...
Pramod Nivrutti Kamble vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
$~2 (28.05.2026)* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 720/2026 PRAMOD NIVRUTTI KAMBLE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anurag Abhishek, Ms. Deepa Sinha, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ravindra Vikram Singh, SPC with Mr. Deepansh Sharma, GP for R-1. Mr. Prashant Phad, Mr. Vijay Palve, Mr. Akash Kakade and Mr. Somanatha Padhan, Advocates for R-5 to 13. Insp. Jaspal Singh, PS-Burari. Respondent no. 7, respondent no. 9 and the minor daughter of the petitioner are present in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAORDER% 29.05.20261. Though this matter was listed on 28.05.2026, in terms ofCircular No. 77/I-G-4/Genl.-I/DHC dated 26.05.2026, the same is being taken up today.2. This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India, read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya NagarikSuraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) praying for issuance of writ of Habeas C...
Shivraj Varma & Anr. vs Commissioner of Police and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 918/2026 & CRL.M.A. 8719/2026 SHIVRAJ VARMA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Mishra, Mr. Piyush & Mr. M Devendran, Advs.versusCOMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Rupali Bandopadhya, ASC for the StateCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 29.05.2026 The case has been taken up today as 28.05.2026 was declared a Holiday on account of Id-ul-Zuha (Bakrid).1. The Court is informed that the complaint filed by the petitioner withthe Concerned Authority has been withdrawn. The learned counsel for the petitioner has also informed the police that he does not want to pursue the complaint any further.2. It is stated that the phone number of the Constable and the SHO hasalready been provided to the present petitioner.3. In view of the above, the learned counsel for the petitioner seekspermission to withdraw the present petition.4. Accordin...
Rexcin Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. vs Rekin Pharma Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 142/2023 REXCIN PHARMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD. .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sachin Gupta, Ms. Prashansa singh, Mr. Rohit Pradhan, Ms. Mahima Chanchalani, Mr. Rajat Jain, Mr. Ajay and Mrs. Archna, Advocates.versusREKIN PHARMA PVT LTD .....Defendant Through: Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELAORDER% 29.05.2026I.A. 15528/20261. This is an application under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 ofthe Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 filed jointly by both the parties.2. Learned counsel for parties state that inter-se disputes have beenresolved amicably. The terms of settlement have been reduced into writing and recorded in para 4 (i) to para 4 (x) of the present application, which are reproduced hereunder: 4. In order to bring quietus to the dispute between the parties and to avoid further litigation, the parties have amicably resolved their disputes and have agreed to settle the matter...
Sh. Sanchit Alagh vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 791/2025 & CRL.M.A. 15992/2025, CRL.M.A. SH. SANCHIT ALAGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaganmeet Singh Sachdeva, Mr. Harshpreet Singh Chadha and Mr. Hridyesh Khanna, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC for the State. Mr. Farman Ali, CGSC with Ms. Usha Jamnal, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Atul Guleria, SPP with Mr. Aryan Rakesh and Ms. Kshipra, Advocates for CBI.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 29.05.2026 The present matter has been listed today i.e., 29.05.2026, since 28.05.2026 was declared a holiday.CRL.M.A. 3973/2026Further to the directions issued on 05.02.2026, Mr. Farman Ali, learned CGSC appearing for respondent No.1 - Ministry of External Affairs, Regional Passport Office, Union of India [MEA (RPO)] states, that in compliance of those directions, the Ministry of External Affairs has not closed the petitioners passport application file nor have th...
Manish Aggarwal vs State of Nct of Delhi & Ors. & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2354/2026 MANISH AGGARWAL .....Petitioner Through: Counsel (appearance not given) with petitioner in person.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for State. Counsel (appearance not given) for R- 3 and R-3 in person.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 29.05.2026 The case has been taken up today as 28.05.2026 was declared a Holiday on account of Id-ul-Zuha (Bakrid). CRL.M.A. 9588/2026 (exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of.CRL.M.C. 2354/20263. By way of the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of theFIR bearing No. 597/2019, registered at Police Station Vasant Kunj (South), Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 354/323/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC') and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis o...
Ms Iba Crafts Private Limited and Ors vs Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3218/2024 MS IBA CRAFTS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohd Faraz Anees, Mr. Ajay Kumar & Mr. Yash Singh, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anurag Ojha, SSC with Mr. Dipak Raj, Mr. Aryaman Singh Chouhan, Mr. Yoginder Singh, Commissioner,ACC Exports, Ms. Premlata Khurana, Assistant Commissioner, FPO ACC Exports, Mr. Amit Kumar, Appraiser FPO, Mr. Vinod Kumar, Superintendent FPO, Mr. Gangesh Gunjan, Superintendent ACC Exports, Mr. Yash Ratn, Superintendent ACC Exports. Mr Jagdish Chandra, CGSC, Ms Maanya Saxena, Adv. Mr Narendra kumar, Insp. Foreign Post, Respondent no.1, 4 and 5.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 29.05.20261. In continuation of the hearing that had taken placed on the earlier dates,Mr. Ojha, learned senior standing counsel appearing for the respondent/customs has placed on record a communicat...
Mankind Pharma Limited & Anr. vs Oasis Bio Bloom Llp & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 273/2026 MANKIND PHARMA LIMITED & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Ms Pallavi Shali, Mr. Prateush Sharma and Ms Nidhi, Advocates.versusOASIS BIO BLOOM LLP & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Aman Goyal, AR of D1 to D4.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGHORDER% 29.05.2026I.A. 15560/20261. This application is filed jointly on behalf of the Plaintiffs andDefendants No.1 to 4 under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC for recordal of settlement between the parties.2. This suit was instituted by the Plaintiff inter alia seeking a decree ofpermanent injunction restraining the Defendants and all others acting on their behalf from manufacturing, exporting, selling, offering for sale, advertising, directly or indirectly dealing in any goods and services under the impugned trademark KABZ END and or any other trademark as may be identical to or deceptively similar with Plaintiffs registered trademark MANK...
Govind Ballabh vs State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1121/2026 GOVIND BALLABH .....Applicant Through: Dr. Ajay Chaudhary and Ms. Nikita Chaudhary, Advs.versusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for the State with Ms. Upasana Bakshi and Ms. Nikita Manish, Advocates SI Priyanka, PS.: AlipurCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 29.05.2026 CRL.M.A. 17418/2026 (For withdrawal of bail application)1. By virtue of the present application, the applicant seeks to withdrawthe present bail application being BAIL APPLN. 1121/2026.2. For the reasons stated in the therein, the present application isallowed and disposed of.BAIL APPLN. 1121/20263. In view of the order passed hereinabove, the present bail applicationis dismissed as withdrawn.4. The date of 20.07.2026 is cancelled.SAURABH BANERJEE, J.MAY 29, 2026/bhThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi...
Rishab Global Industries Private Limited & Anr. vs Prrasch Enterprise ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 323/2026RISHAB GLOBAL INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR......Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Shrutika Misra and Ms. Diya Banerjee, Advocates.versusPRRASCH ENTERPRISE PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS......Defendants Through: Mr. Jayesh K. Sainik, Advocate for D-1, D-2 and D-3. Ms. Harsshita Pothiraj, Advocate forD-5.Mr. Varun Pathak, Mr. Akhil Shandilya and Ms. Nitya Nath, Advocates for D-6. Ms. Priya Goyal and Ms. Aakriti Gupta, Advocates for D-8.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELAORDER% 29.05.2026 I.A. 15760/2026 (Under Order XXIII Rule 3, CPC)1. This is a joint application filed on behalf of the parties i.e. plaintiffs andthe defendant nos.1, 2 and 3 under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as CPC).2. Learned counsel for the parties i.e. plaintiff and the defendant nos.1, 2and 3 state that the inter se disputes between the parties have been se...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »