Delhi Orders Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Xyz vs the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.A. 517/2022 XYZ .....Appellant Through: Mr. Anup Kumar Mishra, Adv. (through VC).versusTHE STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP for the State with SI Anju, PS K.M Pur. Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Adv. for R-2 alongwith Respondent-in-person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAVORDER% 29.05.20261. Hybrid mode.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant states at Barthat he has been instructed to withdraw the appeal, as the Appellant does not want to proceed with the appeal anymore. As the other parties do not have any objection, thus, in these circumstances, the appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn. VIMAL KUMAR YADAV, J MAY 29, 2026/ps This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/06/2026 at 11:16:23...
M/S Maa Harsiddhi Infra Developers Pvt. Ltd. vs E.Cosi Energy Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 120/2024 & CRL.M.A. 509/2024 M/S MAA HARSIDDHI INFRA DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mangaljit Mukherjee, Mr. Lokesh Baimad, Ms. Jyoti Baimad and Mr. Anmol Kaur Nayar, AdvocatesversusE.COSI ENERGY PVT LTD .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 29.05.20261. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.2. Accordingly, the present petition, along with pending application, stands dismissed as withdrawn.3. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J MAY 29, 2026/zp/rThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/06/2026 at 11:28:28...
Subhash Chander Malhotra vs Raman Malhotra & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 12946/2025 and CM APPL.52896/2025 SUBHASH CHANDER MALHOTRA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Riya Arora and Ms. Ananyaa Singh, Advocates.versusRAMAN MALHOTRA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Saumya Tandon, CGSC along with Mr. Gaurav Singh Sengar and Ms. Tooba Khan, Advocates for R-4 (Delhi Police).CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 29.05.2026 The matter is taken up today as 28.05.2026 was declared a holiday on account of Id-ul-Zuha (Bakrid).1. It transpires during the course of hearing that the Divisional Commissioner has disposed of the petitioners appeal filed under Rule 22(3)(4) of the Delhi Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Rules, 2009.2. Pursuant thereto, the petitioner has filed a writ petition [being W.P.(C) 6452/2026] assailing the order passed by the Divisional Commissioner. The said writ petition is pending before a co-ordinate Bench of this Court.3. In the circumstances, no further o...
Zishan & Ors. vs State of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 7738/2024 & CRL.M.A. 15134/2026 (for stay) ZISHAN & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Yusuf Khan, Mr. Amit Sharma, Mr. Jatin Sharma, Mr. Aman Juyal & Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, Advocates along with petitioner-in-person.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State with W/PSI Kanishka. Respondent no. 2-in-person.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 29.05.2026 The case has been taken up today as 28.05.2026 was declared a Holiday on account of Id-ul-Zuha (Bakrid).1. By way of the instant petition, petitioners seek quashing of FIRbearing No. 455/2019, registered at Police Station Shastri Park, Delhi for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 376/342/506/354D/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC) and Section 6/21/17 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereafter POCSO Act) and Section 75 of the Juve...
Qamar Ali vs State
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.A. 614/2005 QAMAR ALI .....Appellant Through: None.versusSTATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP for the State.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAVORDER% 29.05.20261. Hybrid mode.2. None for the Appellant.3. The factum of death of the Appellant has been verified and reported as well by the prosecution.4. Accordingly, the appeal stands disposed of as abated. VIMAL KUMAR YADAV, J MAY 29, 2026/psThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/06/2026 at 11:16:14...
M/S Srishti Automobiles Through Its Proprietor Amit Bhatia & Ors. vs S ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 8135/2024 & CRL.M.A. 31179/2024 M/S SRISHTI AUTOMOBILES THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR AMIT BHATIA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Deepak Singh, Mr. Vikrant Singh, AdvocatesversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 29.05.2026 The case has been taken up today as 28.05.2026 was declared a Holiday on account of Id-ul-Zuha (Bakrid).1. The learned APP for the State, on instructions from the Investigating Officer (I.O.) concerned, informs this Court that the cancellation report has been filed in the present case.2. In view of the above, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to file afresh in case the need so arise.3. Accordingly, the present petition, along with pending application, stands dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.4. The order be ...
Getamber Anand vs State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
$~35 & 36* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 8848/2024 GETAMBER ANAND .....Petitioner + CRL.M.C. 8851/2024 POONAM GETAMBER ANAND .....PetitionerCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 29.05.2026 CRL.M.A. 17585/2026 in CRL.M.C. 8848/2024 CRL.M.A. 17578/2026 in CRL.M.C. 8851/20241. By way of these applications, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petitions with liberty to file fresh petitions, in case need so arises.2. Accordingly, the present petitions are dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.3. It is clarified that these petitions have been directed to be withdrawn at the request of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the matter was not heard on merits.4. Pending applications also stand disposed of.5. The next date of hearing, i.e., 22.07.2026 stands cancelled.6. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J MAY...
Payard Investments Private Limited vs Reserve Bank of India and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 14489/2025 & CM APPL. 59325/2025, CM APPL. 59326/2025, CM APPL. 61465/2025 PAYARD INVESTMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through:versusRESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Tanya Chowdhary, Ms. Manisha Singh, Advs. Ms. Niyati Kohli, Adv., Ms. Prachi Dhanani, Adv., Mr. Ayush Sachan, Adv., Mr. George P. Reji, Adv. for R2-12 Ms. Awantika Manohar, Mr Nilesh Sharma, Ms Parul Dhurvey, Advs. for R13CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 29.05.20261. Since there was a holiday on 28.05.2026, the matter was taken up for hearing today.2. Mr. Wadhwa, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, has handed over the minutes of the meeting on 11.05.2026 which shows some progress in petitioners favour.3. In this view of the matter, Mr. Wadhwa, learned counsel, on instructions seeks to withdraw the petition at this stage, with liberty to file later in case the situation so demands.4. Granting the said liberty,...
Indu Sharma vs Star Health and Allied Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 14412/2024 INDU SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya N Prasad and Mr Pratyush Jain AdvversusSTAR HEALTH AND ALLIED INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shishir Mathur and Ms Muskan Tyagi Advocate for R1 Mr. Abhishek Nanda, Ms. Hrishika Rawat and Ms. Yashika Singh, Advocates for R2 Ms Mehak Nakra Ms Gunjan Suyal, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 29.05.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayers:-a. A Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Orderor Direction to set aside/quash the arbitrary and incorrect Impugned Decision dated 03.11.2023 issued by the Respondent No.1 denying processing of the claim of the Petitioner and denying full coverage of the insurance policy to the Petitioner,b. A Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Orderor Direction directing the Respondent no.1 to pay the amount of Rs. ...
Harmeet Singh vs District Magistrate West Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 1580/2025 HARMEET SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner (through VC).versusDISTRICT MAGISTRATE WEST DELHI & ORS......Respondents Through: Mr. Ripin Sood, Advocate for R-1.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 29.05.2026 The matter is taken up today as 28.05.2026 was declared a holiday on account of Id-ul-Zuha (Bakrid).1. During the course of hearing, it transpires that the necessary inspection was done in terms of the directions contained in the order dated 13.02.2026.2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondents and also confirmed by the petitioner that as of now there is no sewage / water discharge in the locality in question.3. As such, no further orders are required to be passed in the presentpetition except to direct the concerned Civil Authorities i.e., DJB and MCD to ensure that the area in question is regularly inspected to so that the same is properly maintained and no sewage / water ...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »