Delhi Orders Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shivangi Dhankar vs Government of Nct of Delhi Delhi Subordinate Servi ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7856/2026, CM APPL. 38026/2026 SHIVANGI DHANKAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Farman Ali and Ms. Usha Janmal, Advocates.versusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICE SELECTION BOARD & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, SC for GNCTD Services with Mr. N.K. Singh, Ms. Aliza Alam and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 29.05.20261. The present petition concerns the recruitment process for the post ofJunior Judicial Assistant pursuant to Advertisement No. 01/2024. The grievance of the Petitioner is that certain vacancies earmarked for the OBC category have remained unfilled despite completion of the selection process. In this regard, the Petitioner submitted a representation dated 11 th May, 2026, which is still pending consideration.2. At the outset, counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner confines the relief sought in the present petiti...
Rishabh Kumar vs the State & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1737/2026& CRL.M.A. 17505/2026 & CRL.M.A. RISHABH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Irfan Ahmad, Mr. Yakub Raza, Ms. Kanishka Negi, Ms. Harshita, Advocates along with petitioner.versusTHE STATE & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, SC (Crl.) with Mr. Abhinav Kumar, Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advoates along with SI Shivam Sahu and SI Vinay Kumar.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 29.05.20261. Petitioner has some apprehension to his life at the hands of respondent No.5 and seeks adequate police protection.2. Admittedly, coercive process has already been issued against him andwhen the matter was taken up by learned Trial Court on 23.05.2026, the petitioner appeared through video-conferencing and now he has been directed to appear before the Court on 01.06.2026.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is, merely, facing prosecution in a criminal complaint filed under Section 138 of Neg...
Dharmender Panwar vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7751/2026, CM APPL. 37466/2026 & CM APPL. 37467/2026 DHARMENDER PANWAR .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Anam Ikram, Advocate (through VC)versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Precious K. Kelson, Advocate for R-1 and R-2. Mr. Vivek Nilesh Goyal, Ms. Nikita Goyal and Mr. Naresh Goyal, Advocates for R-3. Mr. R.D. Itorora, Advocate for R-4.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 29.05.20261. The present writ petition has been filed against the unauthorisedconstruction being carried out by the private respondent no.4 at Opp. Ghosan Mandir, Adjacent Radha Krishna Apartment, Bhueyan Chowk, Ward No.2, Mehrauli, New Delhi.2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the requisite action has already been taken by the respondent/MCD, hence she seeks to withdraw the present writ petition.3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.4. Pending applications stand closed. AMIT BANS...
M/S Techno Compact Builders vs Railtel Corporation of India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 423/2026 M/S TECHNO COMPACT BUILDERS .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Shivani Karmakar, Advocate (through VC)versusRAILTEL CORPORATION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Harshita Singh, Advocate for Mr. Mr. J.K. Singh with Ms. Shivpriya, Advocate Mob: 8587840444 Email: [email protected]:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNAORDER% 29.05.20261. The present petition has been filed under Section 29A(5) of theArbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act) on behalf of the petitioner seeking extension of time for making the Arbitral Award in the matter of arbitration petition between M/s Techno Compact BuildersVersus Railtel Corporation of India before the Arbitral Tribunalcomprising of Sole Arbitrator Justice (Retd.) Kurien Joseph, former Judge of Supreme Court of India.2. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that final arguments have already been heard by learned Arbitrator lastly on 25...
Mis. Verasys Limited vs Ms. Paramitha Tripathi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 1007/2026, CM APPLs. 37882/2026, 37883/2026 MIS. VERASYS LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Saumya Gupta, Adv.versusMS. PARAMITHA TRIPATHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rohan Jaitley, CGSC, Mr. Dev Pratap Shahi, GP, Mr. Akshay Sharma, Mr. Varun Pratap and Mr. Yogya Bhatia, Advs. and Ms. Akshi Bali, Legal Consultant, PV Division, MEA.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 29.05.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition.2. The petition, along with all pending applications, is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. SACHIN DATTA, J MAY 29, 2026/clThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/06/2026 at 12:58:46...
Deepak Prasad and Anr. vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 29th May, 2026 Uploaded on: 1st June, 2026 + W.P.(C) 7929/2026 DEEPAK PRASAD AND ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjay Baniwal and Ms. Manisha, Advs.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Puja S. Kalra, SC (MCD)CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAIN Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The Petitioners herein viz., (i) Mr. Deepak Prasad, (ii) Mr. Niam Khan,are vendors who have been issued a Certificate of Vending (hereinafter CoV) bearing URI No. 3527357 and URI No. 7300859 under the category Electronic Items and area of vending being Central Zone, Ward S-56.3. The Petitioners are stated to be vending in the area from the Namo Bharat Rapid Station to Metro Gate Nos. 2-3, Railway Road, Sarai Kale Khan Area. The photographs of the Petitioners vend is set out below:NEGI W.P.(C) 7929/2026 ...
Kalpataru Projects International Limited vs Northern Railway
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 437/2026 KALPATARU PROJECTS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sushant Tomar, Mr. Vikrant S. Bloria, Dr. Sunil Mittal Mr. Amit Sagar and Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocates.versusNORTHERN RAILWAY .....Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Biswajit Dubey, CGSC with Mr. Vanshul Pali, Govt. Pleader and Ms. Gurleen Kaur Waraich and Mr. Kritarth Upadhhay, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANORDER% 29.05.20261. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section29A (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal for a period of three months w.e.f 04.07.2026 till 04.10.2026.2. Issue notice.3. Ms. Radhika Biswajit Dubey, learned CGSC appearing on behalf of respondent accepts notice. She states that, respondent has no objection to the petition being allowed.4. I am satisfied that sufficient cause has been shown for extending the mandate of ...
Shri Mahavir Prasad vs Deputy Commissioner, North-West District & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7970/2026, CM APPL. 38273/2026 SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given.versusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER, NORTH-WEST DISTRICT & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Avni Singh, Panel Counsel for GNCTD with Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 29.05.20261. The Petitioners limited grievance in the present petition is thatAppeal No. 08/DC/NW/2019, preferred under Section 64 of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954, has remained pending since the year 2019. The Petitioner accordingly seeks a direction for expeditious disposal of the said appeal.2. A perusal of the order sheets placed on record indicates that theappeal has remained pending for several years and has been adjourned on numerous occasions. In the opinion of the Court, the prolonged pendency of the statutory appeal warrants intervention. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, Respon...
Chetna Kapoor vs Dheeraj Kapoor
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ TR.P.(C.) 112/2026, CM APPL. 38214/2026 & CM APPL. CHETNA KAPOOR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dinesh, Adv. through vc. Petitioner in person.versusDHEERAJ KAPOOR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sahil Gandhi, Mr. Tarun Maan, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 29.05.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition under Section 24 of the CPC seeks the following prayers: -a) Transfer the case bearing HMA No. 589819/2016 titled "Dr. Dheeraj Kapoor vs. Dr. Chetna Kapoor", pending before the Court of Ld. Principal Judge, Family Court, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, to any other competent court of appropriate jurisdiction;b) Pass appropriate directions for restoration of petitioner's right to cross-examine PW-2 in accordance with law. c) Stay the further proceedings of the aforesaid case during the pendency of the present petition; d) Call for the records of the case cas...
Yamuna Ghat Panda Association Regd & Ors. vs Delhi Development Authori ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7769/2026 & CM APPL. 37625/2026, CM APPL. YAMUNA GHAT PANDA ASSOCIATION (REGD.) & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Raman Kapoor, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Naginder Benipal , Mr. Ankit Siwach, Mr. Arjun Baliyan, Advs.versusDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Standing Counsel DDA with Mr. Aditya Verma, Mr. Kamlendu Pandey, Mr Bir Inder Singh Gurm, Advs. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, SC with Ms. K. Kaomudi Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. M. S. Akhtar, Ms. Joohu Kumari, Mr. Kushagra Dixit, Advs. for R-2 to 4CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 29.05.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers :- A. Pass an appropriate writ, order or direction thereby quashing the impugned notices dated 05.05.2026 issued by Respondent no. 3 and 15.05.2026 issued by Respondent no.1; B. Pass an appropriate writ, order or...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »