Delhi Orders Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ms B vs State of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1754/2026 MS B .....Petitioner Through: Mr Kamlesh Kumar Mishra, Mr M Devendran, Mr Aakash Tiwari and Ms Kavita, Advs.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC for the State with Mr. Sangeet Sibou, Adv. Mr. B. Badrinath and Mr. Dhruv Bhardwaj, Advs. for R-2 and R-4.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 29.05.2026 CRL.M.A. 17694/2026 (exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 1754/2026 & CRL.M.A. 17693/20263. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, at this stage, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to approach appropriate forum.4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.5. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J MAY 29, 2026/A...
Dinesh and Anr. vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 29th May, 2026 Uploaded on : 1st June, 2026 + W.P.(C) 7720/2026 DINESH AND ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjay Baniwal & Ms. Manisha, Advs.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Meherunnisa A. Jaitley Adv. for MCD.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAIN Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioners i.e., Mr. Dineshand Mr. Naresh Kumar Ram inter alia praying that the Certificate of Vending (hereinafter CoV) be issued to them and that they be not disturbed from operating from their respective vending sites.3. The case of the Petitioners is that they have participated in the survey which was conducted by the MCD and their registration receipts for issuance of CoV have also been placed on record.4. The survey registration receipt nos. of the Petitioners are 49711 (Mr. Dinesh) and 8208 (Mr. Nar...
Bimal Ramgopal Aggarwal vs Directorate of Enforcement
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P. 351/2026 BIMAL RAMGOPAL AGGARWAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anurag Bhatt, Mr. Lokesh Pathak, Mr. Vaibhav Vijavargiya, Mr. Yash Shahi, Advocates.versusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, SC.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 29.05.20261. By way of this revision petition under Section 438 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner assails an order dated 12.05.2026, by which the Sessions Court rejected an application made by the petitioner seeking permission to travel overseas for a vacation for a period of around four months from 16.05.2026 to 13.09.2026.2. After some hearing, Mr. Anurag Bhatt, learned counsel for thepetitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this petition, without prejudice to the petitioners right to approach the Sessions Court for permission to travel abroad in future.3. The petition is therefore dismissed as withdrawn, in terms of the above submissi...
Fabiha Plastic Industries vs Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7756/2026 & CM APPL. 37555/2026 FABIHA PLASTIC INDUSTRIES .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Pooja Vohra, Adv.versusCOMMISSIONER OF DELHI GOODS AND SERVICES TAX & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sumit K. Batra with Ms. Priyanka Jindal, Advs. for GNCTD.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 29.05.20261. On instructions, a prayer for withdrawal is made.2. The writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.3. Needless to clarify, if any statutory alternate remedy is available, let the petitioner pursue the same in accordance with law.4. The pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J AJAY DIGPAUL, J MAY 29, 2026/AS/avThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/06/2026 at 12:43:07...
Sachin Kumar vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7840/2026, CM APPL. 37999/2026 & CM APPL. SACHIN KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nishant, Advocate (through VC)versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rohit Kathuria and Ms. Nikita Dubey, Advocates for MCD. Mr. Subodh Kumar Kaushik, SPC with Ms. Chhaya Sharma, Advocate for R-6/SHO, PS: Jyoti Nagar.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 29.05.2026 CM APPL. 38000/20261. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 7840/20262. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs: W.P.(C) 7840/2026 Page 1 of 4 W.P.(C) 7840/2026 Page 2 of 43. Mr. Rohit Kathuria, counsel appearing on behalf of therespondent/MCD, submits that earlier a petition seeking identical reliefs, being W.P.(C) 5246/2026, was also filed by the petitioner, which was dismissed vide order dated 20th April, 2026.4. The petitioner has not disclosed the filing of the said writ petition or th...
Weddingpark Hospitalities Pvt Ltd Represented by Sandeep R. Arora vs A ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
$~8 & 9* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 29th May, 2026 Uploaded on: 1st June, 2026 + CONT.APP.(C) 10/2026 & CM APPL. 37470/2026, CM APPL. WEDDINGPARK HOSPITALITIES PVT LTD REPRESENTED BY SANDEEP R. ARORA .....Appellant ANKIT JAIN & ORS. .....Respondents + CONT.APP.(C) 11/2026 & CM APPL. 37473/2026, CM APPL. WEDDING PARK HOSPITALITIES PVT. LTD. .....Appellant BALESH DEVI BHADANA & ANR. .....RespondentsCORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAIN Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 37470/2026 & CM APPL. 37472/2026 in CONT.APP.(C) CM APPL. 37473/2026 & CM APPL. 37475/2026 in CONT.APP.(C)2. These are applications filed by the Appellant(s) seeking condonation ofdelay of 10 days in filing and 37 days in re-filing the CONT.APP.(C) 10/2026 Signed By:RENUKA CONT.APP.(C) 10/2026 and connected matter Page 1 of 4 and 7 days in filing and 38 days in re-filing the CONT.APP.(C) 11/20...
Sanjeev Rohilla vs Delhi Jal Board & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7757/2026, CM APPL. 37522/2026 SANJEEV ROHILLA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Ms. Meenakshi Jha and Mr. Keshav Choudhary, Advocates.versusDELHI JAL BOARD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nirvikar Verma, Advocate for DJB.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 29.05.20261. This writ petition seeks the following reliefs:a) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, in the nature of Certiorari, quashing and setting aside the alleged disengagement of the Petitioner vide office order no. 379 dated 27.12.2019, being illegal, arbitrary and violative of the Principles of Natural Justice; b) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, in the nature ofCertiorari, quashing and setting aside the impugned rejection orderdated 03.02.2026, being non-speaking, arbitrary and unsustainable in c) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, preferably in the nature of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to...
Dost Hospitality Services Pvt. Ltd. vs Oyo Hotels and Homes Pvt. Ltd. ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 441/2026 DOST HOSPITALITY SERVICES PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Debesh Panda and Mr. Piyush Pandit, Advocates.versusOYO HOTELS AND HOMES PVT. LTD. & ORS......Respondents Through: Mr. Sandeep Kumar Mahapatra, Ms. Mrinmayee Sahu and Mr. Tribhuvan, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANORDER% 29.05.2026 I.A. 15725/2026 (under Section 151 CPC for exemption by the petitioner)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 441/20263. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 29A (4) and (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of mandate of the Arbitral.4. Mr. Debesh Panda, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal is to be extended w.e.f 31.03.2026 till 01.10.2026.5. He further submits that the matter is at the stage of final argume...
Jugal Kishore Soni and Ors. vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 29th May, 2026 Uploaded on: 1st June, 2026 + W.P.(C) 7931/2026 JUGAL KISHORE SONI AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjay Baniwal and Ms. Manisha, Advs.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Puja S. Kalra, SC (MCD)CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAIN Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The Petitioners herein viz., (i) Mr. Jugal Kishore Soni, (ii) Mr. SunilKumar Yadav, (iii) Mr. Rajeev Prasad, (iv) Mr. Rajeev Prasad, (v) Mohammad Akhtarm, have been issued a Certificate of Vending (hereinafter CoV) under the category of Others and the area of vending being Central Zone, Ward S-56.3. The Petitioners are stated to be vending in the area from the Namo Bharat Rapid Station to Metro Gate Nos. 2-3, Railway Road, Sarai Kale Khan Area. The photographs of the Petitioners vends are set out below:NEGI W.P.(C) 7931/2026 ...
Imperia Structures Limited vs Chandra Prabha Sharma & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 1267/2026, CM APPL. 37588/2026, CM APPL. 37589/2026 &CM APPL. 37590/2026 IMPERIA STRUCTURES LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Archit Upadhyay, Mr. Vaibhav Shahi, Mr. Shubham Mishra, Mr. Nikhil Kumar and Mr. Ayush Kumar Singh, Advs.versusCHANDRA PRABHA SHARMA &ANR. .....Respondents Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 29.05.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to raise all his rights and contentions as raised in the present petition before the State Commission.3. Accordingly, in view of the submissions made by learned counsel forthe petitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for, and all the rights and contentions of the parties are left open. Pending application, if any, also stand disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMA...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »