Delhi Orders Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Verasys Limited vs Mr. Nagesh Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 1022/2026, CM APPLs.38011/2026, 38012/2026 M/S VERASYS LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Saumya Gupta, Adv.versusMR. NAGESH SINGH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rohan Jaitley, CGSC, Mr. Dev Pratap Shahi, GP, Mr. Akshay Sharma, Mr. Varun Pratap and Mr. Yogya Bhatia, Advs. and Ms. Akshi Bali, Legal Consultant, PV Division, MEA.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 29.05.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition.2. The petition, along with all pending applications, is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. SACHIN DATTA, J MAY 29, 2026/clThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/06/2026 at 12:59:16...
Ofb Tech Ltd vs State of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1740/2026, CRL.M.A. 17517/2026 OFB TECH LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manu Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sanyam Khetarpal and Ms. Lisa Sanrrit, Advs.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms.Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC for the State with Mr. Abhijeet Kumar and Ms.Anisha Gupta, Advs. alongwith SI Praveen Narwal, PS Parliament Street, New DelhiCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 29.05.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Article 226 of theConstitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks following reliefs:- (a) Issue a writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction of like nature, directing Respondent No. 1 to complete the investigation in FIR No. 0049/2025 under Sections 316(5), 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (erstwhile Sections 409, 420, 34 of Indian Penal Code,1860, resp...
Rajula Rawat vs Rajeev Kumar Rawal
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 1004/2026 and CM APPL.37724/2026 RAJULA RAWAT .....Petitioner Through: Advocate (appearance not given) and petitioner in person (both through v/c)versusRAJEEV KUMAR RAWAL .....Respondent Through: Ms. Akanksha Gupta, SPC, UOI.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 29.05.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition.2. The same is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn along with pending application. SACHIN DATTA, J MAY 29, 2026/clThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/06/2026 at 12:58:39...
Ms as Patel vs National Highway Authority of India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 238/2026, CAV 277/2026, I.A. 15816/2026 (EX.) & I.A. 15817/2026 (Ex. From filing certified copies of documents) MS AS PATEL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar, Standing Counsel with Mr. Adithya Ramani, Adv.versusNATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARORDER% 29.05.20261. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner, after arguing for some time, seeks the leave of this Court to withdraw the present Petition, with the liberty to prefer such proceedings as are available to him under law.2. Leave and liberty, as sought for, are granted.3. Accordingly, the present Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.MAY 29, 2026/v/dj This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC S...
Sanjeev Kumar and Ors vs Delhi High Court Through Registrar General an ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7837/2026 SANJEEV KUMAR AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Shashwat Sarin and Mr. Lokesh Kumar, Advs.versusDELHI HIGH COURT THROUGH REGISTRAR GENERAL AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Aditi Mohan and Mr. Sparsh Goel, Advs. Mr. Shubham Goyal, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAORDER% 29.05.2026 CM APPL. 37996/20261. Exemption is allowed, subject to just exceptions.2. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 7837/2026 CM APPL. 37995/20263. After some submissions, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the present petition.4. Accordingly, the petition and the pending application are dismissed as withdrawn. V. KAMESWAR RAO, J MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J MAY 29, 2026/srThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded f...
Pradeep Kumar vs State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 2109/2026 & CRL.M.A. 17368/2026 PRADEEP KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nitin Kumar, Advocate.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 29.05.20261. By way of this application under Section 483 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 103/2025 dated 24.09.2025, lodged at Police Station Tilak Marg, New Delhi, under Section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.2. This is the second bail application filed by the applicant before thisCourt in the same proceedings. The earlier application [BAIL APPLN. 1. By way of the present application, the applicant seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 103/2025 dated 24.09.2025, registered at Police Station Tilak Marg, New Delhi, under Section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.2. Mr. Hitesh Vali, learned Add...
Rajesh Kumar and Ors vs the State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 4311/2026 RAJESH KUMAR AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Shekher Chand Jain, Advocate with petitioners in person.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP alongwith SI Naresh, Main IO, with SI Sangeeta Malik. Mr. RCS Bhadoria, Advocate for R-2 and R-2 in person.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 29.05.20261. By way of the present application, the applicant is seeking quashingof the FIR bearing no. 666/2021, registered at Police Station Bindapur, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections consequential proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement arrived at between the parties.2. Issue notice. The learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State.3. All the petitioners and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsel and Investigating Officer (IO) concerned, Police Station, Bi...
Shahid and Anr vs the State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
$~19-Q* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 4336/2026 SHAHID AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Sana Khan,Adv.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP with Mr. Abhimanyu Arya, Adv Mr. Surya Nath Pandey, Adv. SI Neha Tyagi, PS Shashtri ParkCORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 29.05.20261. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners under Section528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]), seeking quashing of FIR No. 733/2022 dated 23.08.2022, registered at Police Station Shastri Park, District North East, Delhi, under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC], alongwith all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the ground that the parties have amicably resolved their disputes and arrived at a settlement.2. Issue notice. Ms. Manjeet Arya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, accepts ...
Harjeet Singh vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7976/2026 & CM APPL. 38281/2026 HARJEET SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kapil Dutta, Standing Counsel for MCD.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 29.05.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs: W.P.(C) 7976/2026 Page 1 of 32. In essence, the petitioner seeks compliance of the order passed by the Appellate Tribunal MCD (ATMCD) on 11th February, 2020.3. Mr. Kapil Dutta, counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-MCD submits that the petitioner has also filed a civil suit against the private respondent as well as MCD which is pending before the Tis Hazari Courts.4. In the said civil suit, a status report has been filed on behalf of the respondent-MCD. The relevant extract from the said status report is set out below: W.P.(C) 7976/2026 Page 2 of 35. Mr. Dutta submits that t...
Rashmi Mehta vs Sh Deepak Rohilla
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ MAT.APP.(F.C.) 194/2026 RASHMI MEHTA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Manu Nayar, Ms. Meenakshi, Mr. Lali, Ms. Harshita, Advocate with Appellant in person.versusSH DEEPAK ROHILLA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Vandana, Ms. Nancy, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARYHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGARORDER% 29.05.2026 CM APPL. 37798/2026 (Exemption)1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The present application stands disposed of. MAT.APP.(F.C.) 194/2026 & CM APPL. 37797/2026 STAY3. The present appeal is filed under section 19 of the family courtsact, 1984 read with section 47 of the Gaurdians and Wards Act, 1890 by the appellant assailing the Order dated 06.05.2026 passed by the Learend Judge, Family Court-02, west District, Tis Hazari Courts in G.P. No. 82/2025 titled as Deepak Rohilla v. Rashmi Mehta, whereby the following visitation rights have been granted to the respondent/father:- Having considered the...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »