Delhi Orders Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nutech Contracts Pvt Ltd vs Tata Projects Ltd
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
$~65 & 66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 110/2026 MS NUTECH CONTRACTS PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arbaaz Khan and Mr. Ravi Chikara, AdvocatesversusMS TATA PROJECTS LIMITED .....Respondent Through:+ ARB.P. 111/2026 MS NUTECH CONTRACTS PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arbaaz Khan and Mr. Ravi Chikara, AdvocatesversusMS TATA PROJECTS LIMITED .....Respondent Through:CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD ORDER % 29.05.2026 THESE MATTERS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED ON TRANSFER I.A. 15910/2026 in ARB.P. 110/2026 I.A. 15911/2026 in ARB.P. 111/2026 1. These Applications have been filed on behalf of the Petitioner seeking permission to withdraw the present Petitions with liberty to take steps in accordance with law.This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/06/2026 at 11:00:51 ...
Ms Nutech Contracts Pvt Ltd vs Ms Tata Projects Limited
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
$~65 & 66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 110/2026 MS NUTECH CONTRACTS PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arbaaz Khan and Mr. Ravi Chikara, AdvocatesversusMS TATA PROJECTS LIMITED .....Respondent Through:+ ARB.P. 111/2026 MS NUTECH CONTRACTS PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arbaaz Khan and Mr. Ravi Chikara, AdvocatesversusMS TATA PROJECTS LIMITED .....Respondent Through:CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD ORDER % 29.05.2026 THESE MATTERS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED ON TRANSFER I.A. 15910/2026 in ARB.P. 110/2026 I.A. 15911/2026 in ARB.P. 111/2026 1. These Applications have been filed on behalf of the Petitioner seeking permission to withdraw the present Petitions with liberty to take steps in accordance with law.This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/06/2026 at 10:58:37 ...
Raagashree Impex Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner Dvat
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
$~37 (28.05.2026) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 636/2026 RAAGASHREE IMPEX PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Chinmaya Seth, Mr. A.K. Seth, Ms. Palak Mathur, Advocates versus COMMISSIONER DVAT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sumit K. Batra, Ms. Priyanka Jindal, AdvocatesCORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL ORDER % 29.05.2026[File taken up today in view of Notification No. 77/I-G-4/Genl.-I/DHC dated 26.05.2026, wherein the matters listed on 28th May, 2026 were directed to be taken up for hearing on 29th May, 2026.]1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the payment has already been received from the Department and as such, the cause cited in the present petition no longer survives and has been rendered infructuous. 2. In view of the aforesaid, the present petition stands disposed of.NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, JAJAY DIGPAUL, J MAY 29, 2026/sky/skThis is a digitally signed order. The authe...
Shri Santosh Kumar Chhabra vs Shri Harish Chander Chhabra & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 71/2019 SHRI SANTOSH KUMAR CHHABRA .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Aseem Kumar Katoch Advocate for LRs of P-1 & P-2 Ms. Madhavi Agrawal, Mr. Vaibhav Niti, Advocates for P-3versusSHRI HARISH CHANDER CHHABRA & ORS. .....Defendants Through:CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD ORDER % 29.05.2026 I.A. 32169/2025 & CS(OS) 71/2019 & I.A. 1634/2019, I.A. 1649/2023 , I.A. 11317/2023 1. I.A. 32169/2025 has been jointly filed by the parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the CPC for disposing of the present Suit in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 26.05.2026, entered into between the parties. 2. The instant Suit is one for partition and permanent injunction. During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties were referred to the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre to explore the possibility of an amicable settlement. It is stated that vide Settlement Agre...
Subhash Yadav vs Sh. Ashwani Kumar
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 140/2026 SUBHASH YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, Ms.Kritika and Ms.Anjali, AdvocatesversusSH. ASHWANI KUMAR .....Respondent Through: Mr.Arun Birbal, AdvocateCORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI ORDER % 29.05.2026 1. The present petition has been filed by the workman on the premise that the respondent has failed to comply with the order dated 12.11.2024 passed in CM. APPL.35645/2023 under Section 17-B of the ID Act. Learned counsel submits that fairly submits that though last drawn/minimum wages have been received since 18.01.2023, however, the same remained unpaid for the period from 22.07.2022 to 17.01.2023. 2. Considering that the order has been substantially complied with, the present petition is disposed of with the direction that remaining amount last drawn/minimum wages also be paid for the aforesaid remaining period within a period of four weeks.MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J MAY 29...
Preeti Bhutani & Anr. vs Ashwani Goyal & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 216/2026 & CM APPL. 37534/2026PREETI BHUTANI & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajeshwari H. And Ms. Garima Joshi, Advs.versusASHWANI GOYAL & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Beenashaw N. Soni, Mr. Harsh Ahuja, Mr. Rishabh Saxena, Mr. Nakul Singh and Mr. Himanshu Verma, Advs. for R-1 and 2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 29.05.20261. The Local Commissioner has completed the exercise and has filed thereport. The Local Commissioner is present in Court and submits that an amount of Rs.3,500/- was realized by disposing of the infringing material to a scrap dealer. Let the said amount be appropriated by the Local Commissioner towards the expenses incurred.2. Let the parties pay an additional sum of Rs.50,000/- each to the LocalCommissioner.3. With the destruction of the infringing material the controversybetween the parties stands substantially resolved.4. Respective...
Zenith Flooring Services Pvt. Ltd vs Mis Prism Jhonson Ltd
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 305/2026 & CM APPL. 8231/2026ZENITH FLOORING SERVICES PVT. LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Himanshu Kapoor, Advocate through VC.versusMIS PRISM JHONSON LTD .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 29.05.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. In view of the Notification bearing No. 77/I-G-4/Gen1.-I/DHC dated26th May, 2026, the present matter is taken up today, i.e., 29th May, 2026.3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that he seeks permission towithdraw the present petition.4. Keeping in view the submissions of the learned Counsel for thepetitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, JMAY 29, 2026/MR/TPThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning t...
Purshotam Kumar vs the State Goverment of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1311/2026, CRL.M.A. 5288/2026 PURSHOTAM KUMAR .....Petitioner Through:versusTHE STATE GOVERMENT OF NCT OF DELHI ANDANR .....Respondents Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 29.05.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks, and is granted, a period oftwo weeks for filing fresh Memorandum of Understanding.2. Renotify on 28.07.2026.SAURABH BANERJEE, JMAY 29, 2026/AbThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/06/2026 at 11:28:01...
Mahender Singh Dahiya vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3179/2022 & CM APPL. 28909/2023 MAHENDER SINGH DAHIYA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sonia A.menon, Ms. Varsha, Advs. with petitioner-in-personversusDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shikha Sarin, SC for the DDACORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 29.05.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers :- a) Direct an inquiry to be conducted as to why the possession of the plot bearing no 350, Block No A3, Sector 28, Rohini Residential Scheme, 1981 measuring 26 sq. meter, has not been handed over to the Petitioner till date. b) Direct the Respondents to handover the peace ful, vacant possession of plot bearing no 350, Block No A3, Sector 28, Rohini Residential Scheme, 1981 measuring 26 sq. meter to the Petitioner in a time bound manner. c) Direct the Respondents to pay interest at the rate of 12% to the Petiti...
Aarif @ Bihari vs the State of Nct Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 962/2026 AARIF @ BIHARI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Saddam Hussain, Advocate via video-conferencing.versusTHE STATE OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Richa Dhawan, APP for the State. SI Deepak Lathwal, P.S. Narela.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 29.05.2026 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present bail petition; with liberty to file afresh for the same relief before the learned Sessions Court. In view of the above, the present bail petition is disposed-of as withdrawn; with liberty as prayed for. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of.ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, JMAY 29, 2026V.RawatThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/06/2026 at 11:01:40...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »