Delhi Orders Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vanessa Dougnac vs Union of India Through Joint Secretary Foreigners M ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3272/2024 and CM APPL. 13513/2024, CM APPL. 13514/2024VANESSA DOUGNAC.....Petitioner Through: Ms Vrinda Bhandari and Ms Nitya Jain, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH JOINT SECRETARYFOREIGNERS MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS & ANR......Respondent Through: Mr Satya Ranjan Swain (CGSC) & Mr Kautilya Birat, Advocates forUOI.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 30.04.20261. Ms. Vrinda Bhandari, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits thatin view of subsequent development, the petition has been rendered infructuous.2. In view thereof, the petition, along with pending applications, standsdismissed as has been rendered infructuous.PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, JAPRIL 30, 2026aksThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/2026 at 12:44...
Hardwari Lal vs Bijender Gupta
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 30th April, 2026 + CM(M) 1962/2024 & CM APPL. 11411/2024 HARDWARI LAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vinod Dubey and Mr. Anurag Dwivedi, Advs. along with Petitioner-in-person.versusBIJENDER GUPTA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajeev Kumar Rai, Adv. along with Respondent-in-person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER (Oral)Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J.1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227of the Constitution of India, 1950 seeking following reliefs:(a) Allow the present petition and set aside orderdated 06.12.2023 passed by Ms. Shail Jain, principal district and session judge-cum-rent control tribunal East, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, in the RCT no. Control Tribunal has dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner under section 38 of Delhi Rent Control Act.(b) Pass an order thereby status quo bemaintai...
Kamlesh Kumar Shukla vs State Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 912/2026 KAMLESH KUMAR SHUKLA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Aggarwal, Advocate via video-conferencing.versusSTATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for the State. SI Rahul, P.S.: Crime Branch.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 30.04.2026 Mr. Aditya Aggarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present bail petition, with liberty to file afresh for the same relief before the learned Special Judge on ground of parity and delay in trial. The petition stands disposed-of as withdrawn, with liberty to approach the learned Special Judge. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of. It is made clear that this court has not expressed any view on the merits of the matter.ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, JAPRIL 30, 2026dsThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning th...
Pawan Kumar vs State (Nct) of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1007/2026PAWAN KUMAR.....Petitioner Through: Mr.Ashu Kumar Sharma, Adv. with petitioner in person.versusSTATE (NCT) OF DELHI AND ORS.....Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Ms.Priyam Agarwal, Mr.Abhinav Kr. Arya, Mr.Aryan Sachdeva, Advs. Insp. Rakesh Kumar, PS-Neb Sarai.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAORDER% 30.04.20261. Pursuant to our order dated 28.04.2026, the missing girl, Ms. X,has been produced before us.2. We have interacted with her and have counselled her. She statesthat she would like to go back and reside with her parents, including the petitioner, who is her father.3. We have also interacted with the parents of Ms. X and havecounselled them.4. Keeping in view the fact that Ms. X is a major and now wantsto reside with the petitioner, no further orders are required to bepassed in the present Writ Petition. The sam...
Winzo Games Private Limited vs Google LLC & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ FAO(OS) (COMM) 58/2023 CM APPL. 14626/2023 WINZO GAMES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Appellant Through: Ms. Srishti Gupta, Adv.versusGOOGLE LLC & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shruttima Ehersa and Ms. Aiswarya Debadarshini, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAORDER% 30.04.20261. Learned counsel for the appellant states that she has instruction towithdraw the appeal.2. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application is alsodismissed as having become infructuous.V. KAMESWAR RAO, JMANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, JAPRIL 30, 2026/rkThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/05/2026 at 12:09:08...
Mohib Rathod vs Customs
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1141/2026 & CRL.M.A. 12405/2026 MOHIB RATHOD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pashupati Nath Razdan, Mr. Astik Gupta, Ms. Bhawna, Mr. Ayush Kasana, Ms. Akansha Tomar & Ms. Devashish Soni, Advocates.versusCUSTOMS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP Mr. Shubham Tyagi, SSC, CBIC with Ms. Navruti Ojha, AdvCORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 30.04.20261. By way of the present application, the applicant seeks the grant ofregular bail in connection with Case No. VIII(AP)/10/P&I/5528- B/Arrival/2025, registered under Sections 8, 21, 23, and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.2. After some arguments, Mr. Astik Gupta, learned counsel for theapplicant, seeks permission to withdraw the present application.3. The bail application is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.4. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on themerits of the case or ...
Pushkar Rawat & Ors. vs Govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2677/2026 PUSHKAR RAWAT & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Gita Dhingra, Advocate alongwith petitioners (through VC)versusGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for the State with Ms. Nishtha Handa and Mr. Ajay Walia, Advocates Counsel for R-2 R-2 (appeared through VC)CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 30.04.20261. By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIRbearing no. 12/2023, registered at Police Station Maidan Garhi, New Delhi, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC).2. The petitioners and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court inperson and have been identified by their counsels and concerned Investigating Officer (IO) from Police Station Maidan Garhi, Delhi.3. Briefly stated, facts of the present case are that the marriage betwe...
Sameer @Wajid vs State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1395/2026 SAMEER @WAJID .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Satish Chand, Ms. Shweta, Ms. Sakshi Bansal, Ms. Mariya Khatoon and Ms. Aarti, Advocates.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Richa Dhawan, APP for the State.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 30.04.2026Mr. Satish Chand, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to re-file, submitting that the petitioners marriage has been rescheduled. The petition is disposed-of as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of.ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J APRIL 30, 2026/akThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2026 at 11:39:26...
Pankaj Pandey vs New-Delhi Muncipal Council and Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4771/2026 PANKAJ PANDEY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. N.K. Sahoo, Adv.versusNEW-DELHI MUNCIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS. ....Respondents Through: Mr. Sriharsha Peechara, Standing Counsel for NDMC with Mr. Chetanya Singh, ASC, Mr. Soumit Ganguli, Ms. Ravicha Sharma, Ms. Shruti Agarwal, Mr. Akash Sharma and Ms. Swati, Advocates. (M: 9717466788) Mr. Devvrat Yadav, SPC with Mr. Kartik Sharma, GP for UOI. (M: 8285815626)CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 30.04.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Article 226of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking directions to the Respondents to allow the Petitioner to issue the Certificate of Vending to the Petitioner.3. On the previous date i.e., 10th April, 2026, this Court had passed thefollowing directions: [...]3. The Petitioner has been surveyed in the recentsurvey conduc...
Gagan Deep Singh Anandi vs Rashmi Dutta
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ MAT.APP.(F.C.) 105/2025, CM APPL. 15232/2025, CM APPL. GAGAN DEEP SINGH ANANDI .....Appellant Through: Mr Shahzeb Ahmed with Mr Adeel Ahmad Khan and Mr Shashi Kumar, Advs.versusRASHMI DUTTA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pradeep Narula with Mr. Mradul Prakash Agnihotri, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARYHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGARORDER% 30.04.20261. The present appeal assails the Order dated 13.02.2025 (impugnedorder) passed by learned Judge, Family Court-02, District West, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, (Family Court) in GP No.13/17.2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the present appeal ispressed only to the extent of the appellants right to cross-examine PW-1, which was closed by the impugned order dated 13.02.2025. He submits that the examination-in-chief of PW-1 commenced on 04.01.2025 and was adjourned to 13.02.2025. The same was concluded on 13.02.2025, and without granting an opp...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »