Delhi Orders Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pradeep Sagar vs Aishwarya Katyal
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 770/2026 PRADEEP SAGAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Varun Mittal and Ms. Priyanka Jain, Advocates.versusAISHWARYA KATYAL .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 29.04.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeksthe following prayers: a) Issue an appropriate direction, thereby quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 11.02.2026 passed by the Ld. Principal Judge, Family Court, North, Rohini Courts, Delhi in HMA No. 689/18 titled "Pradeep Sagar vs. Aishwarya Katyal"; b) Issue a direction to the Ld. Family Court to prepone the hearing of the case from 27.07.2026 to an early date and further direct the Ld. Family Court to appoint a Local Commissioner to record the remaining evidence of the Respondent's witnesses in a time-bound manner as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court; ...
Saurabh Suneja vs Meenakshi Arora
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ C.R.P. 130/2026 & CM APPL. 27025/2026 CM APPL. 27026/2026 CM APPL. 27027/2026 SAURABH SUNEJA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anurag Andley, Mr. Aditya Andley and Mr. Tanmay Gupta, Advs. along with Petitioner through LR.versusMEENAKSHI ARORA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Zoya Mehta, Mr. Harshit Sharma and Mr. Naman Kumar, Advs. along with Respondent in-person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALORDER% 29.04.20261. Counsel for petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition, with liberty toseek appropriate remedy in accordance with law.2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.3. Liberty granted.4. Pending applications (if any) are rendered infructuous.5. Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.ANISH DAYAL, J APRIL 29, 2026/MK/zbThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. T...
Sandeep Kumar vs Hira Devi and Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 749/2026 & CM APPL. 22637/2026 SANDEEP KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anand Kumar and Mr. Chetan Singh, Advs.versusHIRA DEVI AND ORS. .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALORDER% 29.04.20261. Counsel for petitioner states that respondents have been served throughdigital mode.2. However, none appears on behalf of respondents.3. The issue in the present petition is of a limited scope.4. Petitioners are the alleged owners of the offending vehicle, i.e. amotorcycle bearing registration no. DL-7S-BD-2488, which was allegedly driven by one Sandeep Kumar. The said vehicle was involved in an accident on 22nd January 2017 at about 7:30 PM, resulting in the demise of late Sh. Bahadur Singh Rawat, the husband of respondent no. 1/claimant. Subsequently, FIR No. 54/2017 was registered.5. MACT Petition no.244/2017 was instituted before the MACT, and thedriver was proceeded ...
Aditya Sharma vs State of Delhi N C T of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2369/2024 ADITYA SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Shashi Kiran, Senior Advocate with Mr. Nikhil Kumar Sharma and Ms. Sangeeta Bhalla, Advocates alongwith petitioner in personversusSTATE OF DELHI N C T OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State with SI Pramendra, P.S. Karawal Nagar Counsel for R-2 alongwith R-2 in personCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 29.04.20261. By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIRbearing no. 269/2022, registered at Police Station Karawal Nagar, Delhi for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 354/354A/354B/406/ 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC).2. The petitioner and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court inperson. They have been identified by their counsels and concerned Investigating Officer (IO) from Police Station Karawal Nagar, Delhi.3. Briefly ...
Roshan Lal vs Union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1163/2026 ROSHAN LAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. UA Khan, Mr. Tushar Upadhyaya, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Neeraj Kumar, CGSC, for UOI. Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC with Mr Kshitiz Garg, Mr. Ashvini Kumar, Ms. Chavi Lazarus, Mr. Nitish Dhawan, Mr. Anshul Sharma, Advs. and Insp. Vikas Pannu, SI Vipin Rathi, ANTF/Crime Branch for State.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAORDER% 29.04.20261. This petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for thefollowing relief: i. Issue a writ/direction in the nature of Habeas Corpus for quashing/set aside the impugned detention order bearing no. U-11011/19/25- PITNDPS dated 26.02.2026 passed by Sh. Anupam Prakash, The Joint Secretary, Govt. of India under section 3 (1) of The Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substance (PITNDPS) Act 1988, or that. ii. Allow the petition...
Renu vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
$~75 & 76* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1611/2026 & CRL.M.A. 12954/2026 RENU .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Dipika Saxena, Advocate.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for State with Mr. Gaurav Bisht and Ms. Ankita Bisht, Advocates. Mr. Shahid Ali, Mr. Mohd Salman, Mr. Sameer Tayyeb, Mr. Nazar Hussain, Mr. Ahmad Saeed, Advocates for complainant. (76) + BAIL APPLN. 1620/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13048/2026 PRADEEP .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Dipika Saxena, Advocate.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for State with Mr. Gaurav Bisht and Ms. Ankita Bisht, Advocates. Mr. Shahid Ali, Mr. Mohd Salman, Mr. Sameer Tayyeb, Mr. Nazar Hussain, Mr. Ahmad Saeed, Advocates for complainant.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 29.04.2026CRL.M.A. 12953/2026 (exemption) in BAIL APPLN. 1611/2026 CRL.M.A. 13047/2026 (exemption) in BAIL APPLN. 1620/20261. Allowed, subject t...
Shan Mohammad & Ors. vs State Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3272/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13298/2026 SHAN MOHAMMAD & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Basant Kumar Singh, Advocate alongwith petitioners in-person.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Kiran Bairwa, APP for the State. SI Mahesh, P.S.: Bhalswa Dairy. Mr. Bhupender Singh, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in-person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 29.04.2026 By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioners, who are the former husband and in-laws of the complainant/respondent No. 2, seek quashing of case FIR No. 576/2023 dated 19.06.2023 registered Bhalswa Dairy.2. The petition is premised on Settlement Deed dated 08.01.2024 arrivedat the Counselling Cell, Family Courts, North District, Delhi. The same has been appended to this petition as Annexure P-3.3. The petition is supported by affidavits of the ...
Tv Radha Krishnan vs State Govt of Nct of Delhi Through Sho Crime Bran ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1390/2026, CRL.M.A. 13305/2026 TV RADHA KRISHNAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vijay Tangri, Adv.versusSTATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH SHO CRIME BRANCH SOUTH EAST & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC for State with Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Mr. Ashvini Kumar, Ms. Chavi Lazarus and Mr. Nitish Dhawan and Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advs. SI Anuj Chhikara, PS.: Crime BranchCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 29.04.2026 CRL.M.A. 13306/2026 (Delay of 14 days in re-filing)1. By virtue of the present application, the petitioner seekscondonation of a delay of 14 days in re-filing of the present petition.2. For the reasons stated in the present application, the same is allowedand the delay of 14 days in re-filing of the present petition is condoned.3. As such, the application is disposed of.W.P.(CRL) 1390/2026 (Exemption)4. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the Bhar...
Aman Malik Advocate vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5804/2026 AMAN MALIK ADVOCATE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Atishay Jain & Ms. Diksha Jindal, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Jivesh Kr. Tiwari, CGSC with Ms. Nandini Aggarwal & Ms. Samiksha, Advs. for R-1/UOI. Ms. Chand Chopra with Mr. Punishk Handa, Advs. for R-2/DDA. Mr. Roshan Lal Goel & Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Advs. for R-3/MCD.CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 29.04.20261. Heard Mr. Atishay Jain, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner,Ms. Chand Chopra, learned counsel representing the DDA and Mr. Roshan Lal Goel, learned counsel representing MCD.2. This petition purportedly in Public Interest has been filed by thepetitioner who has described himself to be an advocate with the prayer to issue appropriate direction to the respondents to remove/demolish the alleged illegal and unauthorised construction/encroachment said t...
Bhagwan Balmiki Ashram and Vyamshala (Akhara) Regd. vs Maulana Azad Me ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 810/2026 & CM APPL. 23915/2026 (stay) BHAGWAN BALMIKI ASHRAM AND VYAMSHALA (AKHARA) REGD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Gaur, Adv.versusMAULANA AZAD MEDICAL COLLEGE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 29.04.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.CM APPL. 23916/2026 (Exemption)2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of.CM(M) 810/2026 & CM APPL. 23915/2026 (stay)3. The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,1950, read with Section 151 of the CPC seeks the following prayers: -a) Set aside the order 10.3.2026 passed in appeal U/s. 9 of Public Premises Act being PPA No.02/2026 titled as Bhagwan Balmiki Ashram & Vyamshala (Akhara) Regd. vs. Maulana Azad Medical College & Anr. passed by Ms. Anju Bajaj Chandna, Principal District & Sessions Judge (Central), Tis Hazar...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »