Delhi Orders Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Karan Arora vs State Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1181/2026 KARAN ARORA .....Applicant Through: Mr. Ashwani Jha, Adv. (throughVC)versusSTATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for the State with Ms. Upasna Bakshi and Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Advocates with Insp. Amit Kr., PS: Palam with Complainant in person Mr. Sarthak Karol, SC with Ms. Neelakshi Bhadhauria, Ms. Tanishka Pawar and Mr. Shashank Sharma, Advs. for LRs of deceasedCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 29.04.20261. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw thepresent bail application.2. Accordingly, the present bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.SAURABH BANERJEE, JAPRIL 29, 2026/SoThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/2026 at 11:14:12...
Jatin Bhatnagar vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1095/2026& CRL.M.A. 8283/2026 & CRL.M.A. JATIN BHATNAGAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Dhingra with Mr.Mehzabeen Khan, Mr. Yousuf Karim, Advocates.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP for the State with SI Sachin Kumar, W/SI Jyoti, PS Amar Colony Ms. Sumitra Choudhary, Mr. M.K. Raghav Raman, Ms. Nitya Sharma and Ms. Jasmine Sheikh, Advocates for prosecutrix (through V.C.) prosecutrix in personCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 29.04.20261. Applicant seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No. 0064/2026 dated 04.02.2026,registered at P.S. Amar Colony, for commission of offences under Section 376 IPC and Sections 69/89 Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, (BNS).2. When the matter was taken up by this Court on 18.03.2026, the followingfacts were recorded:-2. According to learned counsel for applicant, the parties were in a consensual love-relationship which, e...
Asif Khan @ Samir vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1166/2026 ASIF KHAN @ SAMIR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tushar, Advocate (through videoconferencing).versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 29.04.20261. The accused/applicant seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No.458/2025 of Police Station Gandhi Nagar for offence under Section 21/29 NDPS Act.2. Learned counsel for accused/applicant seeks permission to withdrawthis application because accused/applicant stands arrested.3. As requested, the bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.GIRISH KATHPALIA, JAPRIL 29, 2026/drThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/04/2026 at 11:56:45...
Gaya Prasad @ Kalu vs the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1162/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13359/2026 GAYA PRASAD @ KALU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mandeep Kumar Sharma, Advocate.versusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for State with Mr. Gaurav Bisht and Ms. Ankita Bisht, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 29.04.20261. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant, at this stage,does not pres the present application and seeks permission to withdraw the same with liberty to approach the learned Session Judge concerned since FSL report has been filed and thereafter, he has filed the present application before this Court.2. In view of the above, the present application along with pendingapplications, if any, stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the learned Sessions Judge concerned.3. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, JAPRIL 29, 2026/v...
FIVE9 Technologies India Private Limited vs Regional Director & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3799/2026 FIVE9 TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arunav Guha Roy, Ms. Radhika Yadav, Mr. Sheedhar Kale, Mr. Priyanshu Jain and Ms. Sakshi Dutta, AdvocatesversusREGIONAL DIRECTOR & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Vijay Laxmi, CGSC for ROC/RDMs. Ruchi Singh Adv for Mr. Vijay Pal SinghCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALORDER% 29.04.20261. Pursuant to order dated 24th March 2026, Ms. Vijay Laxmi, CGSCappearing for Regional Director (RD)/Registrar of Companies (ROC), states on instructions that they shall take decision in accordance with law relating to plea of petitioner for taking on record Form DIR-12 bearing SRN AA1475850 dated 27th February 2023.2. The concerned authority Regional Director (RD)/Registrar ofCompanies (ROC) shall consider and take decision within a period of four weeks from today.3. It is reiterated that the Cour...
Bhanwar Singh Rajawat vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4398/2026 & CM APPL. 21450/2026 BHANWAR SINGH RAJAWAT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ayush Gupta and Ms. Aditi Aggarwal, AdvocatesversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kapil Dutta, Standing Counsel for MCDCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 29.04.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction torespondent-MCD to take action against the unauthorised construction on the first floor, second floor and the third floor of DDA LIG Flat No.A-5B/96B, Janakpuri, New Delhi, being carried out by respondent No.2.2. Mr. Kapil Dutta, standing counsel appearing on behalf of respondent-MCD on advance notice, submits that demolition order was passed against the subject property by MCD on 24th July, 2025. Against the said order, the respondent no.2 had filed an appeal before the appellate Tribunal, MCD (ATMCD), being Appeal No.316/2026 titled as Geerish Ahuj...
Rajeev Aggarwal vs Union Ofindia & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4008/2026 & CM APPL. 19613/2026, CM APPL. 19614/2026 RAJEEV AGGARWAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajeev Sharma, AdvocateversusUNION OFINDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kshitij Chhabra, SPC with Mr. Abhijit Vikram Singh Advocate for R-1/UOIMr. Pranay Mohan Govil, SSC with Ms. Priya Katare, Advocate for R-2 toR-4CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 29.04.20261. Heard.2. The challenge in the present petition is to the impugned Order-in-Original dated 24th June, 2025 arising out of the Show Cause Notice (FORMDRC-01).3. The impugned order dated 24th June, 2025, notes that thepetitioner/noticee did not reply to the DRC-01A, but petitioner did reply to the show cause notice (DRC-01) and vide impugned order passed by the respondent no.4, petitioners claim of Input Tax Credit (ITC) has been disallowed and recovery of the said ITC amount was ...
Ganga Ram Sharma vs Smt. Shashi Jain
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 640/2026 & CM APPL. 19221/2026 GANGA RAM SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dhan Mohan, Ms. Tanisha Bhatia, Ms. Anjali Chaudhary and Mr. Daksh Sehgal, Advs. alongwith Petitioner-in-person.versusSMT. SHASHI JAIN .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 29.04.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition hasbecome infructuous, as the warrant of arrest issued vide impugned order has been executed. It is therefore prayed that the present petition be disposed of as withdrawn.3. Keeping in view the submissions made by learned counsel for thepetitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, are also disposed of.RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, JAPRIL 29, 2026/sds/ikThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified fr...
Rajesh Khanna vs Naresh Kumar Gupta
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 192/2024, CM APPL. 54465/2024 (stay) RAJESH KHANNA .....Appellant Through: Counsel for Appellant (appearance not given)versusNARESH KUMAR GUPTA .....Respondent Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 29.04.20261. Learned counsel for the Appellant, on instructions, states that thematter has been amicably settled and seeks permission to withdraw the Appeal.2. The same statement has been made before the learned Registrar on10.04.2026.3. None is appearing on behalf of the Respondent.4. In view of the submissions made, the Appeal is permitted to bewithdrawn and disposed of accordingly. The pending Application also stands disposed of.NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, JAPRIL 29, 2026/RSThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/20...
Ashok Kumar Yadav vs Inspector Shailender Singh
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
$~38, 44 & 53* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 692/2026 ASHOK KUMAR YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given.versusINSPECTOR SHAILENDER SINGH .....Respondent Through: Mr. Dhananjai Rana, CGSC. + W.P.(C) 425/2025 ASHOK KUMAR YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Beenashaw N Soni, Standing Counsel, MCD with Ms. Ann Joseph, Adv. (M: 9810046611) Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Adv. (M: 9810382091)versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anand Jindal and Ms. Mansi Jindal, Advs. for applicant Insp Shailender Singh. Mr. Manish Kaushik, Adv. for Applicant. Mr. Dhananjai Rana, CGSC for Respondent No. 3/Delhi Police + CONT.CAS(C) 757/2026 ASHOK KUMAR YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given.versusSANJEEV KHIRWAR, COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPALCONT.CAS(C) 692/2026 & connected matters Page 1 of 8CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Appearance not given.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 2...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »