Delhi Orders Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Grena Limited vs Axon Medical Solutions Pvt Ltd and Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
$~44 to 46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 8/2025 & I.A. 1609/2025 GRENA LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Priya Adlakha, Mr. Sreejan Pankaj and Ms. Urvi Nama, Advocates. versusAXON MEDICAL SOLUTIONS PVT LTD AND ANR ....Respondents Through: Ms. Avsi Malik, Mr. Abhinav Sharma and Mr. Ujjwal Jain, Advocates for R-1 and R-2. Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC with Mr. Om Ram and Ms. Nidhi Singh, Advocates for R-2. (45) + C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 9/2025 & I.A. 1613/2025 GRENA LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Priya Adlakha, Mr. Sreejan Pankaj and Ms. Urvi Nama, Advocates. versusLALIT SHARMA AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Avsi Malik, Mr. Abhinav Sharma and Mr. Ujjwal Jain, Advocates for R-1 and R-2. Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC with Mr. Om Ram and Ms. Nidhi Singh, Advocates for R-2. (46) + CS(COMM) 48/2025, CCP(O) 53/2025, I.A. 1593/2025 & I.A. 1595/2025GRENA LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Ms. Priya Adlakha, Mr. Sreejan Pankaj and ...
Khalda Rehman vs Sub Registrar Central District & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 306/2024 KHALDA REHMAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr Fuzail Ahmad Ayyubi, Ms. Akanksha Rai, Advocates.versusSUB REGISTRAR CENTRAL DISTRICT & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Panel Counsel, GNCTD. Mr. Tushar Sannu and Mr. Parvin Bansal, Advocates for DWB.CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV ORDER % 29.04.20261. Mr. Tushar Sannu, learned counsel points out from the communication dated 16.01.2024 and Email Communication dated 16.04.2024 sent to him by the Delhi Waqf Board, that the property in question does not find a place in the list of waqf record. 2. It is, thus, seen that there is no impediment in registering the document in question. 3. The petition, therefore, is disposed of with the direction to the concerned Sub-Registrar to register the document. 4. If there is any other reason besides the property in question beingThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of...
Rajender @ Lala vs the State (Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 169/2026 & CRL.M.A. 1522/2026 RAJENDER @ LALA .....Petitioner Through: NoneversusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Abhijeet Kumar, Advocate with SI NaveenCORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA ORDER % 29.04.20261. None appears for petitioner and same was the status on last date as well. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of ASC submits that the petitioner himself is a murder convict and facing trial in one NDPS case. 2. Since for two consecutive dates, none has appeared for petitioner, the petition and the accompanying application are dismissed in default.GIRISH KATHPALIA, J APRIL 29, 2026/asThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/04/2026 at 13:44:40...
Mohamad Anwar Ahmed Khan vs the State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 466/2026 MOHAMAD ANWAR AHMED KHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohd. Mujmmil, Mr. Abrar Ahmad, Ms. Kusum and Mr. Hemant Choudhary, Advocates.versusTHE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aashneet Singh, APP for the State with SI Bhram Parkash.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN ORDER % 29.04.2026 1. Prosecution has submitted report which indicates that the applicant has joined the investigation. Learned APP for the State states his custodial interrogation does not seem to be required. 2. On the last date, when the present application was taken up, the key of the shop in question was handed over to the complainant and interim protection was granted to applicant on 08.04.2026. 3. The complainant, who is present in Court, also submits that he is satisfied with the possession given to him. 4. Keeping in mind the overall facts of the case, the interim order is, hereby, made absolut...
Grena Limited vs Lalit Sharma and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
$~44 to 46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 8/2025 & I.A. 1609/2025 GRENA LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Priya Adlakha, Mr. Sreejan Pankaj and Ms. Urvi Nama, Advocates. versusAXON MEDICAL SOLUTIONS PVT LTD AND ANR ....Respondents Through: Ms. Avsi Malik, Mr. Abhinav Sharma and Mr. Ujjwal Jain, Advocates for R-1 and R-2. Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC with Mr. Om Ram and Ms. Nidhi Singh, Advocates for R-2. (45) + C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 9/2025 & I.A. 1613/2025 GRENA LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Priya Adlakha, Mr. Sreejan Pankaj and Ms. Urvi Nama, Advocates. versusLALIT SHARMA AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Avsi Malik, Mr. Abhinav Sharma and Mr. Ujjwal Jain, Advocates for R-1 and R-2. Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC with Mr. Om Ram and Ms. Nidhi Singh, Advocates for R-2. (46) + CS(COMM) 48/2025, CCP(O) 53/2025, I.A. 1593/2025 & I.A. 1595/2025GRENA LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Ms. Priya Adlakha, Mr. Sreejan Pankaj and ...
Grena Limited vs Axon Medical Solutions Pvt Ltd and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
$~44 to 46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 8/2025 & I.A. 1609/2025 GRENA LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Priya Adlakha, Mr. Sreejan Pankaj and Ms. Urvi Nama, Advocates. versusAXON MEDICAL SOLUTIONS PVT LTD AND ANR ....Respondents Through: Ms. Avsi Malik, Mr. Abhinav Sharma and Mr. Ujjwal Jain, Advocates for R-1 and R-2. Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC with Mr. Om Ram and Ms. Nidhi Singh, Advocates for R-2. (45) + C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 9/2025 & I.A. 1613/2025 GRENA LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Priya Adlakha, Mr. Sreejan Pankaj and Ms. Urvi Nama, Advocates. versusLALIT SHARMA AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Avsi Malik, Mr. Abhinav Sharma and Mr. Ujjwal Jain, Advocates for R-1 and R-2. Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC with Mr. Om Ram and Ms. Nidhi Singh, Advocates for R-2. (46) + CS(COMM) 48/2025, CCP(O) 53/2025, I.A. 1593/2025 & I.A. 1595/2025GRENA LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Ms. Priya Adlakha, Mr. Sreejan Pankaj and ...
Sporta Technologies Pvt Ltd vs Hillside (Sports) Enc and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 63/2022 & I.A. 6230/2023SPORTA TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rohan Krishna Seth and Mr. Ritwik Marwaha, Advocates.versusHILLSIDE (SPORTS) ENC AND ORS ...Defendants Through: Mr. Rahul Ajatshatru, Mr. Vidushpat Singhania and Mr. Kartikeya Prasad, Advocates for D-1. Mr. Vikrant N. Goyal, Mr. Rattan Goyal, Mr. Yash Basoya and Mr. Inderpreeet Singh, Advocates for D-19.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELAORDER% 29.04.20261. In view of the noting in para 6 of the order dated 19.12.2025, this Courtis of the opinion that since the sporting events, which were the subject matter and the cause of action for the Suit having been filed, have concluded long ago, the relief of permanent injunction appears to have become infructuous due to efflux of time.2. In view of the above, the suit has become infructuous and is disposed ofas such.3. However, it is made clear that this Court has not ...
Sunil Singh Chauhan vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 533/2026SUNIL SINGH CHAUHAN .....Applicant Through: Mr. Gajraj Singh, Ms. Sakshi Sachdeva, Adv.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP SI Sahil, PS Budh ViharCORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 29.04.20261. By way of this application under Section 483 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 390/2025, dated 10.08.2025, registered at Police Station Budh Vihar, District Rohini, Delhi, under Sections 109(2)/118(1)/115(2)/126(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, [BNS] and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act, 1959.2. I have heard Ms. Sakshi Sachdeva, learned counsel for theapplicant, and Mr. Tarang Srivastava, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The status report has also been placed on record.3. By order dated 06.02.2026, the Investigating Officer [IO] wasdirected to inform the comp...
Sundaram Gandhi vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 690/2026 SUNDARAM GANDHI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anubhav Singh, Mr. Nitin Kumar and Ms. Maria M., Advocates.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for the State. SI Hemant, IFSO/Special Cell.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 29.04.2026CRL.M.A. 13377/2026By way of the present application filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the applicant/petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present bail petition; with liberty to file afresh for the same relief before the learned trial court. For the reasons stated in the application, which are duly supported by the affidavit, the application is allowed. The application is disposed-of.BAIL APPLN. 690/2026In view of the above, the present petition is disposed-of as withdrawn; with liberty as prayed for. It is further observed that, liberty granted to the petitioner by the learned Sessi...
Santosh Kumar vs Govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2250/2026 SANTOSH KUMAR ....Petitioner Through: Appearance not givenversusGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mayank Bamniyal, Adv. for R2 Mr. Puneet Yadav, Adv., SC for R3/MCD Mr. Yash Basoya, Ms. Nikita Goyal, Ms. Sonakshi Agarwal, Advs. for R4 Mr Ravi Mishra, Ms Tanisha Bhatia, Ms Anjali Chaudhary, Mr Daksh Sehgal, Advs. for R5CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 29.04.2026CM APPL. 28539/20261. This is an application filed under Section 151 of CPC, 1908 seekingthe following prayers:- (a) Issue the direction to the concerned agency i.e. respondent No.1,2 & 3 to take immediate step to stop the on- go1ng illegal and unauthorized construction over the said property i.e. 23-D, CA Block, Shalimar Bagh, North West, New Delhi and 24-D, CA Block, Shalimar Bagh, North West, New Delhi, in the interest of justice.(b) Pass ad-interim order/ orders thereby directing the abovesaid respondents to st...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »