Delhi Orders Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kaushal Singh vs the State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1242/2026 KAUSHAL SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kshitiz Ahuja, Mr. Vineet Nagar, Mr. Shekhar Bhatia and Mr. Kapil Chaudhary, AdvocatesversusTHE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP with SI Udit and Inspector Sandeep, PS Ranhola .CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 30.03.2026 CRL.M.A. No. 9716-17/2026 (for exemption) Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications stand disposed of.BAIL APPLN. 1242/20261. By way of this application under Section 482 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 37/2026, dated 12.01.2026, under Sections of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012, lodged at P.S. Ranhola.2. I am informed that this is the second application filed by thepetitioner herein before this Court in connection with the same FIR. TheBAIL APPLN. 1242/2026 Page 1 of 2fir...
Namita vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4069/2026 NAMITA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amandeep Singh and Ms. Monika, AdvocatesversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHIAND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, SPC with Ms. Nasreen Khatoon, G.P. for R-3/SHO with SI Sumit Singh, ICPP, P.S. DBG Road Mr. Ashutosh Gupta, ASC for MCD Mr. Prabhsahay Kaur, SC, DDA with Ms. Aditya Verma and Ms. Aryma Sharma, Advocates for STF Mr. Manu Sishodia and Ms. Hina Rajput, Advocates for R-5CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 30.03.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction torespondent/MCD to take appropriate action in respect of unauthorised construction being carried out at the property bearing Municipal No. 10429- 10432, situated at Gali Pathshala Wali, Manak Pura, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005.2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent is making theW.P.(C) 4069/2026 Page 1 of 2aforesaid construction without any ...
Pankaj Sharma vs the State (Nct of Delhi) Thorugh Sho of Ps Hauz Qazi ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P. 187/2026, CRL.M.A. 9424/2026, CRL.M.A. 9425/2026 PANKAJ SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mahesh Kumar Patel (through VC) and Mr. Omkar Sharma, AdvocatesversusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) THORUGH SHO OF PS HAUZ QAZI DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for State with Mr. Dinesh Kumar and Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Advocates alongwith SI Omkant Yadav, P.S.- Hauz QaziCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 30.03.20261. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leaveto withdraw the present petition.2. As such, the present petition alongwith pending applications isdismissed as withdrawn.SAURABH BANERJEE, JMARCH 30, 2026/SoThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/04/2026 at 11:30:41...
Indus Towers Limited vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
$~60 & 67* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI60. + W.P.(C) 4087/2026 with CM APPL. 20020/202667. + W.P.(C) 4119/2026 with CM APPL. 20108/2026CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 30.03.20261. The present writ petitions have been filed seeking quashing of theW.P.(C) 4087/2026 Page 1 of 2Show Cause Notices dated 4th November, 2025. In terms of the aforesaid Show Cause Notices, the petitioner has been called upon to pay license fee in terms of Section 417 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 (hereinafter DMC Act).2. Mr. Ankur Chhibber, counsel appearing on behalf of the petitionersubmits that the petitioner is not liable to pay any license fee in terms of Section 417 of the DMC Act. Replies to the said Demand Notices have been sent belatedly on 25th March, 2026.3. Clearly, the aforesaid replies are yet to be considered by therespondent/MCD. Therefore, in my opinion, the present writ petitions are premature.4. In view thereof,...
Varian Medical Systems International India Pvt. Ltd. vs Union of India ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4007/2026 & CM APPL. 19612/2026VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONALINDIA PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth Punj and Ms. Priyamwada Sinha, AdvocateversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Tanveer Ahmed Ansari Senior Panel Counsel for R-1. Mr. Akash Verma, SSC, CBIC with Mrs. Aanchal Uppal and Mr. Teevra Mishra, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 30.03.20261. The impugned order dated 22nd December, 2025 is informed to havebeen withdrawn vide rectification order dated 17th March, 2026, which is placed on record.2. That being so, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may bepermitted to withdraw the present petition, which position of fact is not disputed by the other side.3. As such, the writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn in view ofaforesaid development.4. Copy of rectifica...
Sh Vikas Kumar & Anr. vs the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2301/2026 SH VIKAS KUMAR & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Anil Kumar Singh with Mr. Firoz Khan and Mr. Amit Rana, Advocates. P-1 in court.versusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Kiran Bairwa, APP for the State with SI Umang Gahlwat, P.S.: Kashmiri Gate. R-2 in-person. Ms. Monika Singh, Advocate for Complainant.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 30.03.2026CRL.M.A. 9413/2026Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed-of.CRL.M.C. 2301/2026By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioners, who are the husband and father-in-law of the complainant (respondent No.2), seek quashing of case FIR No. 142/2024 dated 09.03.2024 registered under sections 498-A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) at P.S.: Kashmeri Gate, North District, Delhi.2. The petition is premised...
Priyanshu Beniwal vs Amity University & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4091/2026PRIYANSHU BENIWAL.....Petitioner Through: Petitioner-in-personversusAMITY UNIVERSITY & ANR......Respondent Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Ms. Priti Kumari, Mr. Pankaj Kumar Ray, Advs. for R-1CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 30.03.2026CM APPL. 20035/2026Exemption granted, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.W.P.(C) 4091/20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers: a) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, directing the Respondent University to forthwith release and refund the unlawfully withheld amount of 74,500/- to the Petitioner, along with interest at the rate of 18% per annum (or such other rate as this Honble Court deems fit) calculated from 02.11.2020until the date of actual realization; b) Issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, orde...
Vinod Kumar vs State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1026/2026 VINOD KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nitin Kumar Yadav and Mr. Anmol Kumar Pandey, Advocates.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC for the State. Insp. Kishore Kumar, P.S. South Rohini.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 30.03.2026 By way of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent/State, that the petitioners name be considered for premature release at the next meeting of the Sentence Review Board (SRB). Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits, that the petitioners case was last considered by the SRB vide its Meeting dated 21.12.2023, at which stage, his case for premature release was rejected. The petitioner has also undergone more than 21 years of actual judicial custody, not counting remis...
Bank of Baroda vs Mahender Kumar
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 671/2026 & CM APPL. 19957/2026 BANK OF BARODA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Praveena Gautam, Mr. Pawan Shukla, Ms. Tissy Annie Thomas and Mr. Rohan Bansla, Advocates.versusMAHENDER KUMAR .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 30.03.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. After some arguments, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave towithdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the appropriate forum.3. Keeping in view the submissions of the learned Counsel for thepetitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty as sought, in accordance with law. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, JMARCH 30, 2026/v/tpThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. T...
Sanjay Kumar vs State of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1020/2026, CRL.M.As. 9578-80/2026 SANJAY KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vipin Sanduja, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Mr. Lovekesh Aggarwal, Mr. Narender Kumar and Mr. Sarthak Ahuja, AdvocatesversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC for State with Insp. Arjun Singh, PS: Krishna NagarCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 30.03.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Article 226 of theConstitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C), the petitioner inter alia seeks a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent nos.1 to 4 to revoke the Look Out Circular (LOC).2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leaveto withdraw the present petition with liberty to seek appropriate remedies in accordance with law.3. As such, the present petition alongwith the pending applications isdismiss...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »