Delhi Orders Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr Swati Arjun vs Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3988/2026, CM APPL. 19587/2026 & CM APPL.DR SWATI ARJUN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bharat Singh, Adv.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ripudaman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Kushagra Kumar and Mr. Amit Kumar Rana, Advs. for UOI. Ms. Monika Arora, CGSC, Mr. Avneesh Arputham, Mr. Anuj Tyagi, Mr. Vikrant Vasudev, Mr. Ankit Sharma and Ms. Anamika Thakur, Advs. for R-2 and 3. Dr. Vikrant Narayan, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLAORDER(ORAL)% 30.03.2026C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. This writ petition is inter alia directed against order dated 27February 2026 by which the services of the petitioner were dispensed with.2. Ms. Monika Arora, learned CGSC who appears forRespondents 2 and 3 submits, on instructions, that the terminationorder dated 27 February 2026 is being withdrawn with liberty to takeaction in accordance with law, ...
Pink City Expressway Pvt. Ltd. vs National Highways Authority of India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 280/2026 & I.A. 8459/2026 PINK CITY EXPRESSWAY PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sidhant Dwibedi & Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advs.versusNATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OFINDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ankur Mittal, Mr. Abhay Gupta, Mr. Ankur Saboo, Mr. Yugantar Chauhar, Ms. Rabaica Jaiswal & Mr. Hrithik Saxena, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 30.03.2026I.A. 8459/20261. This is an application filed for condonation of delay of 20 days in re-filing the petition.2. For the reasons mentioned therein, the application is allowed. Thedelay in re-filing the petition is condoned.O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 280/20263. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration &Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.4. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to theprayer made.5. In view ...
Jatinder Singh Gill@ Jassi vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1208/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9372-74/2026 JATINDER SINGH GILL@ JASSI .....Applicant Through: Mr. Varun Deswal, Mr. Siddharth S. Yadav, Mr. Danish Khan, Mr. Ayush Kr. Singh & Mr. Kashish Ahuja, Advocates.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Akhand Pratap Singh, SPP with Ms. Samridhi Dobhal, Mr. Krishna Mohan Chandel, Mr. Hritwik Maurya, Ms. Lisa Pegwal, Mr. Apoorv Paliya & Mr. Utkarsh Singh, Advocates for State. SI Dinesh Kr., Special Cell.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 30.03.20261. By way of the present application, the applicant seeks extension ofinterim bail for a period of one month (extended until 31.03.2026) granted to him by order dated 26.02.2026 in BAIL APPLN. 849/2026 in relation to FIR No. 455/2024 registered at Police Station Special Cell, under Sections 8(c)/21/22/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.2. Further to the order dated 27.03...
Omkar Kamthe vs State( Nct of Delhi )
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1215/2026, CRL.M.A. 9439/2026 OMKAR KAMTHE .....Applicant Through: Mr. Darshan Singh, Mr. Rajat Kapoor & Ms. Kanika Khurana, Advocates.versusSTATE( NCT OF DELHI ) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP for State. SI Sunil, PS Adarsh Nagar.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 30.03.20261. By way of this application under Section 482 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant seeks anticipatory bail in connection with FIR 886/2025, dated 29.12.2025, registered at Police Adarsh Nagar, District North West, Delhi, under Sections 140(3)/351(2)/127(3)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.2. After some arguments, Mr. Darshan Singh, learned counsel for theapplicant, seeks permission to withdraw this application.3. The application is dismissed as withdrawn. The pendingapplication also stands disposed of.4. It is clarified that this Court has not made any obser...
Maharaja College of Pharmacy vs Pharmacy Council of India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4082/2026 & CM APPL. 20005/2026MAHARAJA COLLEGE OF PHARMACY.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mayank Manish, Mr. Ravi Kant, Mr. Vineet Upadhyay, Mr. Ayush Aanand, Advs.versusPHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIA.....Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Mr. Divyansh Singh, Advs. Mr. Yatharth, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 30.03.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers :- (a) quash the decision letter dated 30.09.2025 issued by the PCI, whereby it has rejected the Petitioners Application seeking approval to the D. Pharm and B. Pharm courses; and(b) consequently, direct the Respondent, to restore thePetitioners Application and process the same for grant of approval to Petitioner for running the D. Pharm and B. Pharm courses, from the academic session 2026-27, interms of the scheduled fixed by the Honble Supreme Court vide its Order dated...
Jai Singh vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi Through Its Commissioner & ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4011/2026 with CM APPL. 19636/2026 JAI SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. A.K. Vashishtha and Mr. R.K. Singh, Advocates.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI THROUGH ITSCOMMISSIONER & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hemant Singh, Mr. Attrey Gupta, Mr. Aman Bidhuri and Ms. Urvashi Jain, Advocates for R-1/MCD. Ms. Latika Malhotra, Advocate for R- 3/DDA (through VC). Mr. Sharique Hussain and Ms. Kirti Garg, Advocates for R-4. Mr. Kaushal Kishore Lal Gautam, SPC for UoI/R-6.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 30.03.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:W.P.(C) 4011/2026 Page 1 of 32. It is submitted that a demolition order was passed on 18th August,2025 in respect of the third floor of the property bearing no. 809-B, Village Chirag Delhi, New Delhi-110017 (hereinafter, subject property). However, no action has been taken by the respondent/ MCD in terms of the said ...
Luvkush Through Parokar vs the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1226/2026, CRL.M.A. 9549/2026-Exp. CRL.M.A. 9550/2026-Exp. from filing copy of chargesheet with its translated copy. LUVKUSH THROUGH PAROKAR ..... Applicant Through: Mr. Narender Kumar, AdvocateversusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for State with Mr. Dinesh Kumar and Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Advocates alongwith SI Anamika Meena, P.S.- GhazipurCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 30.03.20261. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant seeks leaveto withdraw the present bail application.2. As such, the present bail application, alongwith pendingapplications, is dismissed as withdrawn.SAURABH BANERJEE, JMARCH 30, 2026/SoThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/04/2026 at 11:11:44...
Ircon Pb Tollys Ltd vs Nationalhighways Authorityo India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 278/2026 & I.A. 8374/2026 IRCON PB TOLLYS LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Chandwani & Mr. Sameer Chandwani, Advs.versusNATIONALHIGHWAYS AUTHORITYOINDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Junaid Akhtar & Mr. Rohit Ranjan Kumar, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 30.03.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration &Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to theprayer made.3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of theproceedings is extended by six months as prayed for.4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, JMARCH 30, 2026haThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown...
Sourav Sikdar vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4037/2026 SOURAV SIKDAR .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Jyoti Bajaj, Advocate.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....RespondentsThrough: Mr. Jagdish Chandra Solanki with Mr. Garvil Singh, Advocates for UOICORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 30.03.20261. The instant petition is for the following reliefs:-a) Issue a writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent no. 2 to cancel/surrender the second PAN No. DDIPS3897B and retain only valid PAN No. BYCPS8504C; b) Direct the Respondents to update their records and confirm cancellation to the Petitioner; c) pass any such further order(s) or direction(s) as this Hon'ble Court may, in the facts and circumstances of the present case, deem fit and proper in favour of the petitioner and against the respondents.2. The petitioner claims to be the holder of the Permanent AccountNumber (PAN) BYCPS8504C, which is used by him for all financial and taxation pu...
M/S Deepak and Co vs Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation L ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4092/2026 with CM APPL. 20063/2026 and CM APPL.M/S DEEPAK AND CO .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Himanshu Pathak, Ms. Archisha Satyarthi, Ms. Asmita Shukla and Mr. Mohit Gupta, AdvocatesversusINDIAN RAILWAY CATERING AND TOURISMCORPORATION LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Saurav Agrawal, Mr. Anshuman Chowdhury, Ms. Kiran Devrani, Mr. Sumeet Singh and Ms. Samayra Adlakha, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 30.03.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking direction torespondent/ Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation (IRCTC) to extend the tenure of the petitioners contract in respect of Train No. 20977- 78 (AII-CDG Vande Bharat Express) on parity with similarly placed contractors.2. The petitioner vide communication dated 12th January, 2026 wasawarded a temporary license for providing on-board catering services in the aforesaid train on a ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »